Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I’m not one for closing the primary to ‘party only’; that, IMHO, disenfranchises many to vote for whom they think would represent them best....regardless of party.

A simple(r) ‘fix’ to these type of shenanigans: hold the elections for all parties on the same day (make them make some possibly HARD choices)


54 posted on 06/27/2014 8:24:09 AM PDT by i_robot73 (Give me one example and I will show where gov't is the root of the problem(s).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73

Quit forcing the taxpayers to pay for political parties to choose their candidates.

In other words, junk the extra-constitutional political party and primary system entirely.

Allow only write-ins in a general election.

That’s where my thinking has gone.


56 posted on 06/27/2014 8:54:02 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: i_robot73

This was a special run-off election. The only people voting in it should have been GOPers, and the state at least should not let members of the opposite party vote in run-offs of the other party.

That said, I don’t see how closing primaries to “party only” disenfranchises anybody. Presumably, everybody has a candidate in their own party who they think would best represent their interests, and it’s up to them to choose that person in their own party’s primary, not to go mucking up the primary of the other party.

They’re perfectly free to vote for whomever they want when the general election rolls around, but they really should work on getting good representation from their own party in the primaries.


57 posted on 06/27/2014 9:08:21 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson