Posted on 06/18/2014 7:20:09 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
“I have had students who are very strongly pro-the global warming movement in my classes, of course, because most young people have heard this already,” he said. “And when I have them actually do the study, and take apart an IPCC [International Panel on Climate Change] claim, sometimes they break into tears, and they say ‘I can’t believe this is the only class I’ve ever been in in which anyone has ever told me there is even an issue.’”
American University statistician tells The Fix: Belief in climate catastrophe ‘simply not logical’
If one would have asked statistician Caleb Rossiter a decade ago about global warming, he says he would have given the same answer that President Barack Obama offered at a recent commencement address.
“He castigated people who don’t believe in climate catastrophe as some sort of major fools,” Rossiter says of the president’s speech, adding he would have agreed with the president – back then.
But Rossiter would give a different answer today.
“I am simply someone who became convinced that the claims of certainty about the cause of the warming and the effect of the warming were tremendously and irresponsibly overblown,” he said in an exclusive interview Tuesday with The College Fix. “I am not someone who says there wasn’t warming and it doesn’t have an effect, I just cannot figure out why so many people believe that it is a catastrophic threat to our society and to Africa.”
For this belief – based in a decade’s worth of statistical research and analysis on climate change data – Rossiter was recently terminated as an associate fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, a progressive Washington D.C. think tank.
Rossiter wrote an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal titled “Sacrificing Africa for Climate Change,” in which he called notions of climate catastrophe “unproved science,” and shortly thereafter received word from the institute that his position was terminated.
“Unfortunately, we now feel that your views on key issues, including climate science, climate justice, and many aspects of US policy to Africa, diverge so significantly from ours,” their note to Rossiter stated.
Rossiter will continue to offer courses on math, history, politics and statistical analysis at American University, he just landed a deal to write a book on his experiences teaching inside high poverty high schools in D.C., and he recently returned from the Sudan, where he spent time as a Fulbright fellow.
And he will continue to teach college students that the data behind “catastrophic climate change” does not stand up to scrutiny – after all, it’s how he came to hold such opinions himself.
About a decade ago, Rossiter assigned his international statistics students a paper that asked them to analyze some topic of international affairs using statistics. When one female student turned in a paper on humans’ role in global warming, he gave her an F.
“She came to see me and said, ‘But Doc, it’s not fair, I am just repeating exactly what they said,” he recalled. “And I said, ‘That’s impossible, because the evidence you cited here is just wishful thinking, there is no real data.’”
“So I sat down with her and we looked over the article, which is one of the classic ones in climate change in which they developed a computer model that tries to say how much of the half a degree rise in temperature can you attribute to natural variation or the Arctic oscillation, or whatever the hell is going on up in the north there when the seas gets warmer and colder over long periods, things sort of like El Niño- or is it human [caused]?”
“I had to raise her grade because she certainly had cited the evidence they had given, but I just couldn’t give her much of a grade because she should have been able to see – as most people should be able to see – that the computer models were just guessing and sort of notional, and just kind of playing around to get a good fit, but didn’t have much scientific basis.”
“So I became quite interested in this phenomenon,” he added. “So many of my colleagues and so much of educated America and liberal newspapers and all just believe that mathematicians have set up models that should make us very certain that the recent half-degree uptick from 1980 to 2000 was human caused – when in fact they were just playing with the models. I use models a lot, and these were pretty weak.”
From then on, Rossiter specifically assigned students papers to look at global warming and climate change issues, and over the years graded hundreds of papers on the topic. The results from this further solidified his belief that the global warming crisis is one that’s man-made.
“So there is really two big statistical questions: what caused the little warming, and what effect did the warming have on these other climate variables?” he said. “I am a pretty decent statistician, I have taught for many, many years. The data that support the headlines are very, very weak, very, very notional, and simply not logical.”
“You couldn’t have this many terrible effects from a half a degree rise in global temperature. It’s probable that there are some, but it gets a little boring because it’s always weak data, because that is the nature of a tremendously complex system.”
Over the years, he’s broken a few students’ hearts when they learn of this truth.
“I have had students who are very strongly pro-the global warming movement in my classes, of course, because most young people have heard this already,” he said. “And when I have them actually do the study, and take apart an IPCC [International Panel on Climate Change] claim, sometimes they break into tears, and they say ‘I can’t believe this is the only class I’ve ever been in in which anyone has ever told me there is even an issue.’”
“I always enjoy that but, I would enjoy it the other way, too,” he said. “I always really push them to evaluate, dig down and learn the arguments of the other side- that is part of education.”
Yet it is Rossiter’s former colleagues at IPS and similar think tanks who refuse to debate him.
“I found at the Institute for Policy Studies no willingness to sit down and talk through the areas in which our analyses diverged,” he said. “For years, I would ask their climate staff, who were not particularly scientific or statistical, they are social activists, to come to my classes and debate me, to talk it out with me in front of the IPS board.”
There is a reason they won’t, he adds.
“I think they believe … that you give legitimacy to the ‘denialists’ if you debate them,” Rossiter adds. “I think that’s a terrible idea. … At IPS, like many other places, people don’t want to debate it because they have this funny statement that, and Mr. Obama repeats it every time he opens his mouth, ‘the debate is over.’ I have never heard a more remarkable statement in my life about anything.”
It’s not only unproven, IT’S NOT SCIENCE. It’s another scam like those emails from the African scam artists.
Modern day Salem witch hunt.
When your ‘god’ is the State, why anything is possible.
“Facts? We don’t need no stinkin’ facts!”
Blasphemy !!!! Can’t have people telling the Truth about The Scam Global Warming
Think tanks are usually run by ideologues. A think tank’s primary function is to ask other people for money. Anyone who undermines/offends your donor base has to go.
Well it is science, financial science with a formula: Lie to people + pass mandates = you get to steal their money.
Many people have gone into science with the intention of promoting their world view. This is against the nature of science, which is to search for the unbiased truth.
Because of course science has nothing to do with raising questions and testing hypotheses, even consensus positions. How horrible of Galileo or Newton or Einstein to have questioned the scientific consensus of their day. The way that any questions are silenced shows me that this is not about science, but politics, ideology, even an environmentalist religion. And why should we believe that all scientists are pure as the driven snow and not possibly susceptible to ideological or other corruption?
I used to have a very high opinion of science in general when growing up.
Not any more. The terrible politicization of it by the left is destroying it.
But, but, but. Doesn’t the prof have tenure? Ain’t this a sad state of affairs. Someone speaks the truth, gets called a heretic, gets removed from the position and vilified. Yet there are other profs who do more heinous things and they can’t be gotten rid of come hell or high water. (not that I’m advocating any flooding.)
“Think Tanks” never are. They are political action committees.
well he does describe the only way i’ve ever seen change come to the leftist mind: force it to find out the truth for itself. i guess that’s the value of a really good teacher.
Read Dr. Tim Ball's new book, "The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science." Anyone who still believes in Al Gore Warming after absorbing those facts is either a fool or a zealot.
“Many people have gone into science with the intention of promoting their world view. This is against the nature of science, which is to search for the unbiased truth.”
Yes. Same could be said for media.
There is truth and untruth. Everything we are up against is untruth.
Not to worry! He WILL continue teaching and writing books and EDUCATING students.
This article gives me a LOT OF HOPE!
“Unfortunately, we now feel that your views on key issues, including climate science, climate justice, and many aspects of US policy to Africa, diverge so significantly from ours,” their note to Rossiter stated.
So what the hell is “Climate Justice?”
This is what all teachers should do. This is what all students should do. Unfortnunately, the left does not want people to think for themselves.
:: the global warming crisis is one that’s man-made ::
NOTE: the global warming ^^crisis^^ is..man-made. Not that global warming is man-made. Significant.
It’s not only unproven, IT’S NOT SCIENCE.
FWF, see my tagline...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.