Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Korwin: “Prohibited person” is now “Prohibited household”
dailycaller.com ^ | 4/17/2014 | Alan Korwin

Posted on 04/19/2014 9:06:48 AM PDT by rktman

There is a new wrinkle in rights-denial and the lame-stream media told you nothing, except we want to get as many people into the background-check system as possible, to make everyone safer. 90% of the public supports this. (92%, according to a democrat’s party mailer with Mr. Obama’s name on it)

First, let me repeat: 90% of the public doesn’t support much of anything, especially gun stuff, so that number, like most “news” numbers these days, especially from advocates, politicians or government (unelected apparatchiks) is totally bogus (John Lott dissected their ludicrous math). Even so, try this “thought experiment” opinion poll: “The bill proposed for universal background-checks will create a government list of everyone in America who owns firearms, and makes a criminal out of anyone whose list of guns is inaccurate or incomplete. Do you support this?” Still 92% in favor? Not. I described the actual bill in plain English last year: http://www.gunlaws.com/Page9Folder100up/PageNine-122.htm

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; guncontrol
I kinda thought this was the case all along. If there is a "prohibited" person living in your domicile then by association, there "should be" no firearms in the house that the "prohibited" person may gain access to. Guilt by association? How convenient for "them".
1 posted on 04/19/2014 9:06:48 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

90% of the 8 million Obamacare enrolees, of which 50% are children under the age of ten, and who’s parents sustain themselves on 80% government assistance, who pay no taxes, and would give up their personal liberty for another $50 on their EBT card and an Obamaphone, of who have not paid the premiums for their Obamacare coverage.


2 posted on 04/19/2014 9:18:10 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Yup. Paid no taxes but will no doubt get a “refund”. How does that work? LOL! I know, rhetorical.


3 posted on 04/19/2014 9:19:24 AM PDT by rktman (Ethnicity: Redneck. Race: Daytona 500)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I got my own “thought experiment”. “How many Feds would be killed following any further incursions against our Liberties?”. A. 1,000. B. 10,000. C. 100,000


4 posted on 04/19/2014 9:19:28 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Alan rocks.
He’s a regular guest on Armed American Radio on Sundays.


5 posted on 04/19/2014 9:24:24 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Uninstall Fascist Firefox. Get Pale Moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Bttt


6 posted on 04/19/2014 9:25:28 AM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
will create a government list of everyone in America who owns firearms, and makes a criminal out of anyone whose list of guns is inaccurate or incomplete.

I live in CA where firearms registration is mandatory. Without going into detail, I had contact with an armed DOJ (swat attire) team. They had a list of all weapons attributed to me.

There were 2 of my 14 handguns that had incorrect serial numbers. One was a Bulgie Mak where the crylic data from the slide was used instead of the importers SN on the frame. The other was a Glock missing one digit in the SN.

I was able to show my original purchase paperwork and these wonderful gov't public servants didn't confiscate my weapons. I did get the issue resolved later. The CA DOJ has sent me a complete list of all firearms in my name.

7 posted on 04/19/2014 9:30:05 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Sounds like a “plus” to me. Like they’re doing you a favor by keeping an itemized inventory for you so you are “free” to do other things. :>}


8 posted on 04/19/2014 9:55:38 AM PDT by rktman (Ethnicity: Redneck. Race: Daytona 500)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Check list so as to not miss any when loading the boat.


9 posted on 04/19/2014 10:00:30 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (You can count my felonies by looking at my FR replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: umgud
The CA DOJ has sent me a complete list of all firearms in my name.

Well prepared for the confiscations, they are. Did you "register" the Claymores in the bushes by the walkway? (just kidding, we know it's only IEDs).

10 posted on 04/19/2014 11:38:42 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

CA didn’t start registering long guns until Jan 2014, so all mine are not listed. Handgun registration has been on the books for eons, but, like many others, I did have a boating accident.


11 posted on 04/19/2014 12:27:34 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: umgud

I feel safer knowing that You’re safer knowing that We All are safer.
Doing it for the Children.
And Safety!


12 posted on 04/19/2014 3:59:38 PM PDT by Big Red Badger ( - William Diamonds Drum - can You Hear it G man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

Who said I was safer? But, I get your point.


13 posted on 04/19/2014 4:08:14 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Former felon G. Gordon Liddy has commented on his radio show about just how many guns Mrs. Liddy has stashed around the house (for ready access in the event of home invasion).


14 posted on 04/21/2014 6:54:21 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson