Hillary's Campaign for Student Body President

Everything Hillary Clinton does and says looks and sounds like she's running for president of the student body, collecting testimonials, Valentines and staying out of everything remotely controversial.

The liberal consensus is that she's the inevitable president. Who's to stop her? But she was "inevitable" once before.

This lady's not for burning or even for getting singed by questions about her past and the lack of solid accomplishments of her own. She gives every evidence of wanting only to glide in triumph into Bubba's old office with neither bumps nor bruises, or even a hair out of place.

She seemed confused and rattled the other day in New York City, appearing in a panel discussion at an oh-so-friendly forum by an organization called "Women in the World." When she was asked to identify her proudest moment as secretary of state, she couldn't come up with one, not even a New York minute, but her rambling answer was nevertheless revealing about who she thinks she is, or wants to be.

"Look," she said, "I really see my role as secretary (of state), and in fact, leadership in general in a democracy, as a relay race. I mean, you run the best race you can run, you hand off the baton. Some of what hasn't been finished may go on to be finished."

She would get the baton first from Barack Obama. She shies from linking herself to President Obama's achievements, such as they are, in foreign affairs, where -- like it or not -- she would have to talk about Benghazi, Syria, Ukraine and Crimea, just the subjects a secretary of state would be expected to know best. These are failures, not successes, and she prefers a link to Obama's record at home (but presumably not to Obamacare).

She praises Obama for "stimulation and growth" abroad, for "getting back to positive growth and working with our friends and partners. ... I think we really restored American leadership in the best sense, that, you know, once again, you know, people began to rely on us, to look at us, you know, setting the values, setting the standard." (The verbal hiccups are revealing, too.)

This is a view of the Obama legacy, which she wants to inherit, that a lot of people here and abroad certainly don't share. The baton the public might see her taking is not from Obama, but from her husband. This would come perilously close to taking refuge in the role of "wife of," a role much derided by liberals and anathema to the feminists she would count on to become the first female president.

Hillary Clinton has carefully avoided answering the question that has Washington in a permanent buzz: Will she, or won't she? But she has surrogates eager to answer if she won't. They're getting on with the campaign. Groups with names like Ready for Hillary, Correct the Record and even a super PAC called Priorities USA recycled from Obama's 2008 campaign are skirmishing with Clinton opponents in anticipation of the struggle to come.

One opposing super PAC, called America Rising, is concentrating its early focus on her record as secretary of state. "There won't be a single tangible (accomplishment) they can cite," Tim Miller, director of America Rising, tells The Wall Street Journal.

The tough questions she avoids now will be about Benghazi and how she responded to the terrorist attacks on an American legation that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador. She angrily has declined to talk about Benghazi, once dismissing the question with a contemptuous retort: "What difference, at this point, does it make?" We can expect to see that video footage again and again.

One of Clinton's oldest friends, dating from her years in Arkansas, thinks in the end she might not run. "I'm not in the political camp," says Linda Bloodworth-Thomason, a filmmaker who worked on several Clinton campaigns. "I'm in the friends camp, and the friends camp definitely has concerns about her running." Cheryl Mills, who was Clinton's chief of staff at the State Department, stands in both camps, and she has told her not to run. There are lingering concerns about her health -- she suffered a blood clot in her head two years ago -- and another losing race would tarnish the record made over four decades.

Hillary Clinton and the Democrats would focus on young voters, the millennials, but these are just the voters with little memory of her White House years with Bubba. The young might see her, at 69 on Election Day 2016, as an old lady. No woman wants that on her resume.

There are many Democrats/liberals who are not in love with the Clintons. There are also some ambitious Democrats, such as Cuomo, who would see their own White House aspirations put on hold for 8 years at least, if they let Hillary waltz to the . Nomination in 2016.

Hillary was inevitable in 2008, but was taken down in the primaries.

If Hillary was inevitable in 2008 and fell short, why are the talking heads and political pros so convinced that she is really inevitable this time around?

She had only been Senator for a short time. Now she has Secretary of State added to her resume. That is the difference. I know Obama beat her last time, but the country wanted that new shiny penny....however, they found out it was mighty tarnished. The “Hope and Change” nonsense won’t work this time round. The country wants to have familiarity this time and that is why Clinton is being held up to high esteem and also why Jeb Bush is the talk of the town right now. People had their time to rebel now it is time to get back to the “adults”. Like a teenager whose parents allow them to be free for awhile. The teenager finds out it is not what it is cracked up to be.

-- "I think we really restored American leadership in the best sense, that, you know, once again, you know, people began to rely on us, to look at us, you know, setting the values, setting the standard."--

HRC, a graduate of the Carolyn Kennedy "School of You Know."

She was elected senator in 2000, so in 2008 she had more years in the Senate (although devoid of any achievements) than she spent in the Department of State.

She ought to be touting her one achievement as Secretary of State--she flew more air miles than any previous Secretary of State. No doubt consumed more booze at 35,000 feet than any other Secretary of State too.

The liberals in the Democratic Party were suspicious of Bill Clinton in 1992--he was too "centrist" for them. Hillary may be more of a rigid left-wing ideologue than Bill, but she might be more willing to compromise with the Republicans than Obama has been, just like Bill was.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.