Wow, do you realize how nutty and out of touch you sound?
As far as the rest of your post, why don't you just try reading the thread, and see if you can see HiTech's war against politically opposing gay marriage.
HiTech's political war is against conservative politics, and in behalf of preserving gay marriage, and even abortion, on other threads.
His political activism is to end social conservative politics and to defeat conservative politics. Have you read our exchange on this thread at all?
“Wow, do you realize how nutty and out of touch you sound?”
I will take it as a compliment based on the rants I have read coming from YOU on this thread.
In 29 you said: “It is Satanic for you to keep fighting to preserve gay marriage at the federal level and claim to be doing it in the name of God.”
In 36 you said: “The creepiest defense of gay marriage and gay marriage candidates on freerepublic, or anywhere on the planet, ‘gay marriage in the name of Christ’.”
In 74 you said: “HiTech makes the most Satanic, anti-God, anti-Christian posts we see”
These are outrageous accusations which you have not supported with evidence. Now, looking back, I do see that HiTech engaged you first with a couple of posts which might have understandably made you angry. I do not agree with his support of libertarian candidates. I personally lived in Ron Paul’s district for several years and experienced his all-over-the-board positions which are morally opposed to abortion and homosexual marriage but then leave the door wide open when it comes to the role of federal government. I share your frustration with libertarianism. I am all for a limited role of federal government, but that does not mean a nonexistent role. That is a cop out. I think some libertarians would say that if some states want to allow Satan worshippers to offer little babies as sacrifices and eat them, then it is a state’s right issue. When a state or nation or other entity becomes this corrupt, they can no longer be part of civil society. A live and let live attitude does not work.
“As far as the rest of your post, why don’t you just try reading the thread,”
Why don’t YOU answer my question of exactly which one?
Because I followed your comments to HiTech, and his to you, all the way to the start of this thread and found NONE of the ridiculous accusations you made to be substantiated. That is why I asked you to provide ONE solitary link. All you did is continue to rant and insult.
“Have you read our exchange on this thread at all?”
Yes. Again, point out the specific post he made anywhere on this thread or any other place where he advocated for homosexual sex or abortion because that is a slanderous accusation if you have NOTHING to back it up. If you don’t know how to copy and paste a link, you could mention a post number or quote what was said or something. You provide zero evidence to back up your outlandish statements.
As far a what the Bible says about homosexual sex, you can call me “nutty” but you might as well call Moses, Jesus and Paul the apostle “nutty” if you think saying that homosexual sex deserves the death penalty because that is what they all said. And I will be happy to post the exact references if you do not know the Bible well enough to verify this fact for yourself.
The Nazi movement was a homosexual movement. This is well documented in The Pink Swastika which can be downloaded online for free. When homosexuals get in power they are unrestrained by their own conscience or the ability to feel empathy or sympathy toward the pain of others. They will do far worse than give the death penalty to anyone who opposes them. They have access to America’s children NOW. Anyone who tries to take that away from them will be in danger of a fate worse than death.
I may sound like “nutty” to people like you now. But history and the Bible both validate what I am saying.
I never said that the death penalty was the solution to the prominence of homosexual perversion in our society. I never advocated changing the laws to enact the death penalty for this. (The Bible says the same thing about adultery which is far more prevalent in our culture than homosexuality.) I merely stated that this is how serious of a crime the Bible makes it. I believe the only hope for society or homosexuals or all of us, is to repent of our sins and believe the Gospel.
That being said however, I do believe the threat of the law is necessary to restrain evil. When society accepts God’s moral law that homosexuality is a crime worthy of death, you will still have times when it happens. But it will happen less, and less openly, and you will not see homosexuals openly trying to spread their perversion to children by being their teachers, mentors or parents. Homosexuals cannot be changed by passing a law, but they can be restrained from doing a lot of things they are doing now.
I have been stating my position openly for 10 years. When I said this nation was in danger of following the exact same path as Nazi Germany due to the homosexual activism, I had Freepers mock and laugh at me. After Obama became president and “evolved” on his position on homosexual marriage, no one has been mocking me about where this nation is headed. A lot more people see the writing on the wall.