Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2

That I agree with 100%. But that’s not the problem here, they ran cows on land they had not leased.


13 posted on 04/09/2014 8:33:47 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Dusty Road
"they ran cows on land they had not leased."

There is a more complicated back history.

The question is can the livestock and the indigenous species on the gov't land reach an accommodation?

Should the gov't land belong to the gov't?

18 posted on 04/09/2014 8:36:57 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Dusty Road

But his family owned the land before the BLM stole it.

“We own this land,” he said, not the feds. He said he is willing to pay grazing fees but only to Clark County, not BLM.“Years ago, I used to have 52 neighboring ranchers,” he said. “I’m the last man standing. How come? Because BLM regulated these people off the land and out of business.”-

See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/feds-steal-ranchers-cattle-in-armed-helicopter-raids-feds-attempt-to-rub-out-family-farmers_042014#sthash.FHJrOjRR.dpuf


23 posted on 04/09/2014 8:39:07 AM PDT by FBD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson