Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects appeal over gay bias case
Associated Press ^ | Apr 7, 2014 2:13 PM EDT | Jeri Clausing

Posted on 04/07/2014 11:31:56 AM PDT by Olog-hai

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday from a studio that refused to photograph a lesbian couple’s commitment ceremony, letting stand a New Mexico high court ruling that helped spur a national debate over gay rights and religious freedom.

The justices left in place a unanimous state Supreme Court ruling last year that said Elane Photography violated New Mexico’s Human Rights Act by refusing to photograph the same-sex ceremony “in the same way as if it had refused to photograph a wedding between people of different races.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; albuquerque; elanephotography; gaystapo; homosexualagenda; johnroberts; photographystudio; religiousfreedom; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 04/07/2014 11:31:56 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This country is so going down hard.


2 posted on 04/07/2014 11:34:16 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

This is the DC disease of endorsing ALL forms of hedonism.

(see spitzer’s call girl)

This is pushing the born that way myth/lie in order for the DC players to justify having sex as a power play sport.


3 posted on 04/07/2014 11:36:08 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Gay Agenda is SO much more important than our religious freedom.


4 posted on 04/07/2014 11:36:34 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Moderation in temper is always a virtue; moderation in principle is always a vice. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

SO in other words you cannot say “ I can’t provide that service to you because it would violate my religious freedom” but you can say “I’m too busy” or the price is “$1 million”.

right?


5 posted on 04/07/2014 11:37:30 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
Are the supremes still in session? I'm guessing that they rejected to hear the case, not that they rejected the appeal. While it has the same effect, it is a misleading headline by AP nevertheless. Since there were no votes listed, I'm guessing this is a rejection of hearing the case, possibly on some real or makeup technicality.
6 posted on 04/07/2014 11:40:31 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They may be able to order that they take pictures, but they cannot force them to do a good job.

Use throw away cameras and take all of the pictures of just one of the couple. Make them out of focus.


7 posted on 04/07/2014 11:42:16 AM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Christian photographers should not take any wedding photos, if they must take all wedding photos. Take pictures of birthday parties, retirement parties, and family reunions etc. or find another line of work altogether.


8 posted on 04/07/2014 11:45:20 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

First, Americans forced to purchase insurance, and now Americans forced to work/participate in celebration of an evil, ungodly sacrament directly against their values and religious beliefs.

America is so dead. Crossed the dark side.


9 posted on 04/07/2014 11:49:05 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Refusing to hear such a basic and important case, which has reached the highest level in the state courts, is a very significant failure to support the Constitution and the basic principal of religious freedom for Christians.

I’ll bet they would have taken the case if the photographers were Muslims. But it never would have gotten so far in the first place.

It’s not only a hit against religious freedom, it’s a violation of a free economy. No firm should be forced to take on a job if they decide they don’t want it.


10 posted on 04/07/2014 11:49:42 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)
They may be able to order that they take pictures, but they cannot force them to do a good job.

Use throw away cameras and take all of the pictures of just one of the couple. Make them out of focus.

Then they would have a lawsuit. I would call and tell them I was to ill, and when they forced it I would show up in make up that made me look like death warmed over and throw up at their feet as I arrive saying "if you insist, I'll take the pictures but you must sign this waiver absolving me of any issues due to my illness". Let them deal with that.

11 posted on 04/07/2014 11:50:01 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee
Christian photographers should not take any wedding photos

That's a big part of a professional photographer's business.

Why should Christians stop doing something because someone else wants to force them to work against their will?
I think that used to be called "slavery".

This is just wrong - and it went wrong when politicians agreed to "protect" homosexuality the same as race.

12 posted on 04/07/2014 11:51:22 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“We The People” are no more. Now it is us and them - and getting worse!


13 posted on 04/07/2014 11:51:32 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)

In the long run, that would only hurt the business owners. Gain a reputation for doing crappy work, and the marketplace will do the rest.


14 posted on 04/07/2014 11:51:50 AM PDT by Coronal (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

15 posted on 04/07/2014 11:52:19 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
How many SCROTUS members would have to recuse themselves because they're gay? Kagan, Roberts, ?????...

And HOW exactly is two men having anal sex comparable to racial differences? Sex is VOLUNTARY BEHAVIOR, race is INVOLUNTARY STATE OF BEING. WTF~!!!!!!!!

16 posted on 04/07/2014 11:52:24 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“In declining states the leadership intuitively chooses the most harmful course of action.”- A Great Historian 1888


17 posted on 04/07/2014 11:54:23 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Could it be that a government which was big enough to be everyone’s nanny, has now been conscripted into being everyone’s bully?

There are enough quasi-conservatives left that I’d almost have to read a good reason into this, such as the chance to deal with a larger issue rather than a smaller one.

But for now it looks like all New Mexican businesses of faith are in danger. I hope it generates a condign reaction. That state is supposedly largely Catholic. Now maybe they will start caring about Jesus not just at their altars.


18 posted on 04/07/2014 11:55:22 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

In a free country, Christian confectioners would not be forced to pack anybody’s fudge.


19 posted on 04/07/2014 11:56:34 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Obamacare: You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Now, brothers, behave yourselves.....


20 posted on 04/07/2014 11:57:12 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson