Posted on 04/02/2014 2:03:05 PM PDT by PaulCruz2016
Ann Coulter says Romney should run again, has the best position on immigration and that "Cruz is a disaster on illegal immigration."
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Ann is a single issue voter and her issue is no amnesty for illegals. Romney was the best on illegal immigration in 2012. That is what she is saying.
Probably about the time she started effecting “Lesbo” mannerisms!
Six :)
Personally, I’m with you. I can understand Cruz’s viewpoint though. And a very informative graphic you posted.
I think a couple more have joined since I posted that. Slot #6 is all yours though. ;^)
In Ann’s defense, she has always been about getting her name in front of book buyers and Talking Head producers for being a really aggressive conservative sounding attention getter.
Those of us that know what real conservatives sound like, the gal has always been more a defender of GOPe types.
Ann Coulter and Alan Combs should go back to Roswell, NM until the 2028 election!
Sorry. I smelled a phoney.
Which speeches are you quoting, the ones before he was nominated? It certainly wasn’t from any speeches after he was nominated.
Romney is the biggest liar in the republican party. You believe his lies because he’s taught himself to believe even his wildest stories once they come out of his mouth.
We would have full on amnesty right now if Romney had actually decided to campaign against Obama and had won.
Which speeches are you quoting, the ones before he was nominated? It certainly wasn’t from any speeches after he was nominated.
////////////////////////////////////////////
Care to make a wager on that?
save your money...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/13/us/cruz-tries-to-claim-the-middle-ground-on-immigration.html?_r=2&;
OK, that’s something anyway. I disagree only with the first part. They should not receive any kind of legal status, in my opinion. I don’t favor deportation of people who have committed no other crime. Let them stay. Shadows, shmadows. But for Pete’s sake let’s not let any more in.
I’d like to know all the reasons the pols favor legal status for these people. I know one is low-wage workers so the fat cats can become fatter. Other reasons may have to do with keeping track of them. Our government loves keeping track of everyone.
The Democrats are after voters. The Republicans are after cheap labor.
Oh right. I didn’t mean the Democrats. That’s obvious.
Legal immigration is a whole separate issue. On that one, I would favor getting rid of the chain immigration for family members, which is abused and also unfair about who it lets in. It’s out of control.
Also, rather than seek out people who are proficient in technology, we should seek people who can teach it well on many levels, and perhaps make the teaching a requirement. That would help our own citizens be better prepared for the job market.
Right on, she is irrelevant. From prominant to dumpster.
Didn’t I read today that Gowdy is a cosponsor of the defense bill inclusion of dreamer citizenship for military service that would become the Trojan horse for getting the whole senate amnesty bill inserted in conference?
I’m with you.
Yes, she’s wrong about Romney being a good candidate, but she’s absolutely right about Cruz and immigration:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/13/us/cruz-tries-to-claim-the-middle-ground-on-immigration.html
Maybe she’ll do some good by forcing conservatives to look at Cruz’s betrayal on immigration before we’re all locked in on him.
And she was right to back Hunter in 2008.
So you favor ignoring the laws governing deportation? And the vast majority of them have committed other crimes like identity theft, using phony SSNs, working illegally, tax evasion, etc. If we allow those who enter illegally to stay here, why have a border or any enforcement mechanisms.
Do you know of any other country in the world that will not deport those who illegally enter it?
Yeah...she went batty from the limelight long ago. Some people get better, others get a big head from fame. I think Rush is another one that has gone slightly batty..still logical, but emotional in place of strength.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.