Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The tiny Estonian town that could spell the end of NATO
The Week ^ | 3/27/2014 | By Michael Ben-Gad

Posted on 03/27/2014 3:54:03 PM PDT by Mariner

Will Putin call NATO's bluff?

The Russian invasion and rapid absorption of the Crimean peninsula might seem like the spark ready to ignite a new Cold War. In fact, given the feeble Western response so far, the more likely outcome is not the division of Europe once more between NATO's Western alliance and a neo-Soviet Russia, but rather the fracturing and ultimate demise of NATO and the Western alliance itself.

Of course, no one expects the West to use military force to protect Ukrainian territory, despite the 1994 Budapest Memorandum in which Russia, the U.S., and the U.K. guaranteed Ukrainian sovereignty in exchange for its relinquishing the nuclear weapons that remained on its territory after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Yet even the Russians now seem surprised, indeed somewhat amused, by how disunited and weak the Western response has been. So what comes next?

Having demonstrated to the Ukrainians with his Crimean excursion the emptiness of Western guarantees...

(Excerpt) Read more at theweek.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: estonia; moldova; nato; obama; putin; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-152 next last
To: Mariner
Maybe the "Arch Duke Ferdinand" moment was Sevastopol?

I know who poked the Bear while sleeping. It was the weakness from 0bama, and the disastrous five years of his foreign policy.

We could be witnessing the start of WWIII.

5.56mm

61 posted on 03/27/2014 5:54:56 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
"It can meet any Russian capability up to and including a nuclear one. "

While I have no doubt US Forces would prevail eventually, I also have no doubt that Russia's best...not the export stuff...will have more than a few surprises for us.

They also maintain the ability to strike and do tremendous damage to US/NATO forces and airfields, depots etc.

A dozen Blackjack bombers can wreak havoc all on their own, but when combined with the rest of the Russian Air Force they will definitely get some targets.

The American public is not used to taking losses and Congress is even worse.

62 posted on 03/27/2014 5:59:26 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine
By aggressively recruiting former Soviet satellites, the formerly defensive alliance shifted to offense by planting its flag on Russia's doorstep -

It was really up to the people of Estonia if they wanted to receive the NATO flag. Being a former "Soviet satellite" should have nothing to do with it, at least morally.

And your description that Estonia was "aggressively recruited" is hyperbole.

63 posted on 03/27/2014 5:59:42 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine
"Wars start over such miscalculations"

1914 all over again. Entangling alliances over nothing that matters to most of the American People.

64 posted on 03/27/2014 6:00:43 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Should the US go to war with Russia over a town in Estonia that is nearly all Russian?

Yup. ................................................... Of course, its like going into Czechoslovakia when parts of it was nearly all German. In fact I half expect Putin’s Navy may try and annex Brighton Beach and Sheepshead Bay Brooklyn soon. LOL will our Leader do then? Draw a red line in Queens? s/


65 posted on 03/27/2014 6:03:16 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (2016 an election or a coronation of a Queen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine

By aggressively recruiting former Soviet satellites, the formerly defensive alliance shifted to offense by planting its flag on Russia’s doorstep -


Utter rubbish. Where did you come up with that? Alex Jones? Savage?

The fact is the new NATO members lined up and happily joined NATO. No recruitment necessary. They have plenty of graves in their country to remind them that periodically Russia murders them. That’s all the motivation they needed to seek NATO membership.


66 posted on 03/27/2014 6:05:26 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
"If the original NATO made sense then an expanded NATO makes sense"

I'd like to hear a supporting argument for that contention.

the idea that the USA has an interest in defending Bulgaria from anyone, at any time is ludicrous to me.

Romania?

And, would you expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia...and would their defense with US Forces make sense?

To "make sense" there would have to be a real US strategic interest.

67 posted on 03/27/2014 6:07:26 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
"It was really up to the people of Estonia if they wanted to receive the NATO flag"

WTF?

You don't think the original members of NATO got a vote on that?

Of course all the European members thought it was a GREAT idea. What I want to know is where the hell was the US Senate when the treaty modification came up for a vote? Surely it had to be ratified by the US Senate.

I contend it was a major strategic blunder to expand NATO. There is no US interest served by doing so.

But I also contend we MUST honor that sh!tty treaty at all costs lest the entire world sink into chaotic destruction.

68 posted on 03/27/2014 6:14:06 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

Putin is not going to annex Poland - he’s going to give Lwow, Grodno, Brest and possibly Wilno BACK to Poland.

Which begs the question - what about Breslau, Stettin, Danzig, and Königsberg?


69 posted on 03/27/2014 6:19:31 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Reviewing my comments I said, "If the original NATO made sense then an expanded NATO makes sense". The example I gave as being a new NATO member was Estonia.

So I ask you, do you think defending the original NATO countries make sense?

If so then why wouldn't Estonia make sense?

70 posted on 03/27/2014 6:20:03 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Putin is not going to annex Poland - he’s going to give Lwow, Grodno, Brest and possibly Wilno BACK to Poland.

Nice guy that Putin.

71 posted on 03/27/2014 6:21:12 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Yes.

On another site there was a heated discussion regarding what if California with its love for illegal aliens votes to join Mexico.

72 posted on 03/27/2014 6:24:53 PM PDT by Jane Austen (Boycott the Philadelphia Eagles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
"It was really up to the people of Estonia if they wanted to receive the NATO flag"

WTF? You don't think the original members of NATO got a vote on that?

Don't waste my time with your nonsense comment. Read what I wrote. Read every word. Do you know what the word "receive" means?

Unbelievable.

73 posted on 03/27/2014 6:25:09 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Just where would you draw the line? A few days ago you were saying Crimea but no more. Now you’re willing to start carving up Estonia. What are you going to say when Putin talks about the poor oppressed Russians in Brighton Beach?


74 posted on 03/27/2014 6:26:27 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I have it on good authority that Kerry-Heinz has sent a flurry of stern notes to the Russians. The Russian responses are #$@%%^^^^ you stupid dip sh!t!


75 posted on 03/27/2014 6:27:26 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (History is about to be repeated in the Third World of Progressive intellectual and moral depravity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
You're right.

My tone and words were totally uncalled for.

I apologize.

76 posted on 03/27/2014 6:27:39 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign; All
I believe there's a solution here to this conundrum.

Notify NATO that any nation that does not spend 3% of GDP on Defense and meet certain readiness and capability requirements to be defined by our US Military professionals...will be expelled from the Alliance. They have 5 years.

If we cannot gain agreement with the majority of NATO countries on this, we will withdraw from the treaty in that same 5year timetable.

77 posted on 03/27/2014 6:31:25 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

NATO died in 1986 when France denied the US overflight rights to Libya.
It died again in 2003 when Turkey denied the US overflight rights as well.

It is a two way street.
Now, when they are scared they want us to fly over in powerful aircraft. Right.


78 posted on 03/27/2014 6:33:32 PM PDT by Fear The People (When the government fears the people, you have LIBERTY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I understand completely.
The current circumstances aren’t the same. Events are still manageable if they had the will.
What is war but failed diplomacy?
Economic pressure is the proper method. Tell Russia that they would be financially responsible for any area they would annex. The IMF loaned Ukraine $18B and since Crimea is still recognized as sovereign territory, Russia would have to pay proportionally.


79 posted on 03/27/2014 6:38:25 PM PDT by griswold3 ("Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Apology excepted.

We'll have to agree to disagree on the expansion of NATO.

80 posted on 03/27/2014 6:39:23 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson