Posted on 03/26/2014 6:27:42 AM PDT by shove_it
For the first time in American history, non-whites will make up half or more of the next generation, likely pushing Washington toward a bigger government — and the GOP better tone down their anti-government rhetoric if they want to win them, according to a top polling outfit...
~snip~
His advice to the GOP: “Try to take as much of the anti-government rhetoric out.”
...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Correlation to the number of takers vs makers as well.
Recently I used the term "illegitimate child" to a group of high-schoolers. Blank faces met my gaze.
"How on earth can a child be illegitimate?" queried a young lady.
The language has changed - bastard means "white man I don't like" and illegitimate means nothing.
I'm old, I thought it was funny...
Sorry. I forgot the comma after First world. A First world, Non-Asian Minority nation is a First world nation that has a population that is not Asian or White. A person in the US that is not Asian or White is a Non-Asian Minority.
The question is: are there any First world, Non-Asian Minority nations that reject socialism and cherish liberty?
oh you can forget that.
Patriots come in all colors, shapes and sizes.
There is a very deep lesson hidden in that question. Back in the early 1800s, the Irish wouldn't have been considered "white" in the commonplace sense of "normal Americans being demographically overwhelmed by abnormal foreigners." On the contrary, the Irish were considered the abnormal foreigners who were going to demographically overwhelm the 'normal' Americans of British and/or German origin. Except that within two generations, the Irish became considered "white" in that same sense, as opposed to...the Italians, who were in the later 1800s considered the "abnormal foreigners" who were going to demographically overwhelm the "normal Americans." Except that within two generations, the Italians became considered "normal Americans," and it was the Poles, and the Russian/Ukrainian Jews, and the Japanese, who were the "abnormal foreigners." And the pattern continues to this day. Asian-Americans continue to vote Democrat, but within the next generation they'll get the clue and begin to realize that their interests do not lie with the Demagogues of the Underclass, and the same will happen with Latinos whose children will be bilingual just as the children of Irish and Italian and Polish and Japanese immigrants were, and whose grandchildren will struggle with Spanish just like their non-Latino classmates. "Normal American" is a state of mind, not a state of skin.
Lots of irrelevant hand wringing and assumption. Only liberals are more interested in color than content of character.
The real problem will be how to govern when whites are both a minority and still hold most of the wealth.
Historically Mexicans were considered white. If that were still the case the racial breakdown wouldn't have moved much at all with the exception of Asians jumping up a few percentage points.
The black percentage of the population in America has remained fairly stable for over 100 years.
In 1880 blacks made up 13.1% of the population, as of the 2010 census their percentage of the population was still 13%
In 1880 whites made up 86.5% of the population. As of the 2010 census 72%.
In 1880 Asians made up less than half a percent of the population. As of the 2010 census they are up to 5%.
But wait you say... the 1880 numbers show :
whites 86.5 + blacks 13.1 + Asians .2 = 99.8%
while the 2010 numbers show:
whites 72% + blacks 13% + Asians 5% = only 90%
so where is the missing 10% you ask ?
AH! that's the trick!! the government decided to create a new race called Hispanic around 1970 (which prior to that was considered part of the white race)
SO ... if disregard the democrats creating a new race to pander to in the 1970’s and add the 10% of Hispanics back into the white category where they belong. You will get these numbers
2010
white - 82%
black - 13%
asian - 5%
So, as you can see, when you remove the government manipulation, the numbers for whites and blacks both have remained fairly constant. The only major changed in the racial breakdown in the US since 1890 is that the Asian percentage of the population is 10 times larger at the expense of whites.
But the EU and the European Court are now sending them back. They recently passed a new immigration law allowing (encouraging) jobseekers from poor parts of Eastern Europe, as well as Romanian gypsies and Irish travelers, to cross all boundaries in Europe, ostensibly in search of work. London already has encampments in the city parks. Beautiful greenswards and town playing fields have been invaded by trash-strewing, child-abusing travelers.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458625/David-Cameron-limit-freedom-movement-rules.html
Until nations arrive at the understanding that the boundaries of properties, localities, nations and cultures still matter and have benefits to mankind as well as drawbacks for freeloaders as well as desperate immigrants, we are going to have almost unending civil strife, no matter where.
I'm shocked at your language.
Almost as if we are at the climax of a secret 50 year plan. F%$ them.
There. Fixed it.
They just published another story the other day, the majority of school children in Texas now are minority. 5 states are that way.
But I agree, we have to be careful, Patriots come in all colors and sizes. Still, without a doubt, some minorities do make up voting blocs.
When the USA’s CERTAIN implosion and collapse happens, the 50 (or is it 57) dominoes are going to come crashing down. The remaining dominoes will, of necessity, be forming associations.
I bet Texas leads a Central Union of several dozen states into a new country unified around a NEW and strengthened Constitution and tied only to the remnants of the old deceased USA in common Defense and Interstate Commerce Agreements.
The Left and East coasts, along with Colorado can then continue on their path to socialism and Marxism rather like Venezuela is now. Down in our new Central America Union, immigration will be strictly enforced and people of “Liberal persuasion” will find it difficult to flee their socialist utopia by relocating to our Central America Union. As my momma used to say “they will reap what they have sewn”.
With a restructured Costitution that follows Texas’s current and existing legislative limitations and adds more like term limits, and term limits for a Supreme Court, and government completely out of health and education, to mention only a few, Central America will then march forward while STRICTLY controlling immigration.
Oh, and guess what, the writer of this article presumes that the USA will continue like it is forever which it will not. So, with a NEW Central American Union, and without Big Urban Coastal Cities, then what’s your non white % population partner???
In what world are non-whites intellectually incapable of realizing that bigger government means less freedom? If that were the case, Star Parker, Clarence Thomas, Frances Rice, Allen West, Erika Harold, and Mia Love wouldn’t exist.
All of these OUTSTANDING and INTELLIGENT human beings embrace the idea of CONSTITUTIONAL government....not “anti-government” ideals....even though they are blatantly non-white.
That right there is some racist garbage. It's like saying, "non-whites tend to be ignorant, dead-beat, government-dependent, non-productive, subhuman scumbags -- un-domesticated government livestock."
Conservatives insist that each person can be, and is responsible for becoming, all that they can possibly become; that each person can build a life that is productive, constructive, self-reliant, and relatively FREE from government intervention.
Conservatives are not the racists in these conversations.
I forgot to include that bankrupt states e.g. ILLINOIS need not apply to the Central American Union.
No worries about California as their Marxist governor and legislators would NEVER agree to give up their power and become a nobody in a conservative union.
Still, when you look at photos in urban settings taken in the 1880s vs those taken recently you cannot deny the US’s demographic shift away from ‘white’, at least in appearance. Surely due to recent waves of indigenous hispanics.
Yeah, you're right. The other things they'll dredge up is all the starving children due to school lunch cutbacks, and that we are racists, bigots and homophobes....
“to Win the End”
The end is to win or not, you see.
And, winning is not a collection of wealth and memory.
Look far ahead when you are young if you can.
Good planning and hard work will win the end.
Life’s goal will take its toll, on the foolish and selfish one.
Trophies and cash are nothing, if your goal hasn’t begun.
You can travel the world and play the field.
And no matter your path, the end won’t yield.
Without a good partner you will wonder your fate.
From the time you are young until it’s too late.
So, be wise and start now to win the end.
It’s a war to find a good mate, so you better begin.
Then, be a good parent and make your mark on the earth.
And, advise the young to produce many a birth.
Love and teach them to obey and trust.
As, all generations of ancestors did for us.
When one gets old and the end is to be.
The trophies and travel mean little.
Children, and their children, are your greatest legacy.
Not all Hispanics/Latino’s are non-white. That is the fallacy in these statistics. Many Hispanics are either all-white or majority white, and they blend into the white group very well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.