Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TransCanada Tries To Seize U.S. Land For Keystone Pipeline (Eminent Domain)
Forbes ^ | 02-24-2014 | James Conca

Posted on 03/10/2014 6:35:34 PM PDT by PaulCruz2016

On Wednesday, a Nebraska judge struck down a state law that would have allowed TransCanada to use the power of eminent domain to seize private land to help construct a short 300-mile segment of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline between Cushing and Steele City, Nebraska.

The law in question, LB 1161, allows Nebraska Governor David Heineman and TransCanada to avoid regulators in siting a crucial portion of the pipeline.

Lancaster County District Judge Stephanie Stacy sided with three landowners who challenged the law, finding that regulatory power over industrial companies such as TransCanada must remain with agencies such as the Nebraska Public Service Commission, not the governor’s office.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: eminentdomain; keystone; keystonepipeline; pipeline; transcanada

1 posted on 03/10/2014 6:35:35 PM PDT by PaulCruz2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

Does a private pipeline that adds to national economic security = public good?

Last century with the railroads the answer was yes.


2 posted on 03/10/2014 6:37:33 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

Is TransCanada a US company or is it Canadian?


3 posted on 03/10/2014 6:40:31 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Believe In The Law Until It Intereferes With Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

Big Blow would just love to be able to put hundreds of 500’ tall industrial wind turbines in everybodys back yards via “Eminent Domain”


4 posted on 03/10/2014 6:44:55 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

They’re based in Canada. Actually, the headline of this Forbes article used to be: ‘Foreign Company Tries To Seize U.S. Land For Keystone Pipeline’, but got changed for whatever reason.


5 posted on 03/10/2014 6:47:50 PM PDT by PaulCruz2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Ask Suzette Kelo.


6 posted on 03/10/2014 6:48:32 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

Domestic or foreign, companies ought to pay fair market prices for whatever land they want to acquire, with the consent of the owners.


7 posted on 03/10/2014 6:52:18 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
The Keystone pipeline is a "common carrier" and thus has the same right to "eminent domain" as do the railroads, public highways, etc.
8 posted on 03/10/2014 6:54:39 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

“Does a private pipeline that adds to national economic security = public good?

Last century with the railroads the answer was yes.”

I believe that it was actually “hell, yeah”.

Of course, we have cases now where eminent domain is use for the good of well-connected people (only).


9 posted on 03/10/2014 6:59:24 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

They aren’t saying it can’t be ED just that it must be through the state commission and not the private company as required by state law - second time I’ve seen this story in about two weeks both times people on both sides misread it.


10 posted on 03/10/2014 7:02:21 PM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

Thanks, yeah, didn’t sound quite right.


11 posted on 03/10/2014 7:38:36 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Believe In The Law Until It Intereferes With Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

Pipelines or wind turbines. The choice will be made.


12 posted on 03/10/2014 8:32:05 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

We have 36 miles of pipelines crossing the ranch, we still own the land, we drive on it and farm over it. Only thing we can’t do is build on top of it. The word seized is very misleading, they will be forced to allow the line to pass through and will be paid nicely for that privilege. The going pipeline Rod price here is about 300 to 425 per Rod that’s a nice chunk of change about 130,000 dollars a mile. If you have timber you can also log and sell it off before the line starts. Every 3 years they come down the line clearing brush which helps the grazing. 3 of the lines are 8 miles long running east to west and one runs north to south and it’s 12 miles long. We also ended up with 11 new gates and cattle guards.


13 posted on 03/11/2014 3:23:19 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dusty Road

Dusty, more people need to be aware of this...good post. Sharing and hope you don’t mind.


14 posted on 04/18/2014 5:19:35 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson