Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Son of God...Takes off big time!!!
Hollywood Reports

Posted on 03/01/2014 6:04:24 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX

Blockbuster in the making. Son of God blasts off to major viewer numbers, Thursday night and Friday!!! Could be #1 movie this week. Terrific movie across the board. All Americans should see this wonderful, motivating, religious film!!! Son of God will do terrific across the entire world!!!


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: movie; newage; sonofgod; sonofgodmovie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last
To: stars & stripes forever

That passage doesn’t refer to all of Scripture. It specifically says it refers to that scroll of prophecy.


121 posted on 03/01/2014 11:49:23 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

If I’ve read the book, I never see the movie version, except “Lone Survivor”.


122 posted on 03/01/2014 12:34:40 PM PST by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

“That passage doesn’t refer to all of Scripture. It specifically says it refers to that scroll of prophecy.”

You are correct. However, we are not given ‘artistic freedom’ to edit what we what out of the Bible. S. Michael Houdmann (www.gotquestions.org) expounds upon the danger of distorting God’s Word:

Although the warning in Revelation 22:18-19 is specific to the Book of Revelation, the principle applies to anyone who seeks to intentionally distort God’s Word.

Moses gave a similar warning in Deuteronomy 4:1-2, where he cautioned the Israelites that they must listen to and obey the commandments of the Lord, neither adding to nor taking away from His revealed Word.

Proverbs 30:5-6 contains a similar admonition to anyone who would add to God’s words: he will be rebuked and proven to be a liar.

Although the warning in Revelation 22:18-19 applies specifically to the Book of Revelation, its principle must be applied to the entire revealed Word of God. We must be careful to handle the Bible with care and reverence so as to not distort its message.


123 posted on 03/01/2014 1:27:55 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

A movie is not “the Bible.” It’s a movie!

If someone published a book that purported to be “the Bible,” and made changes and deletions, that’s something else.

There was Bible published around 1930 that caused an uproar, even among Protestants. It changed the words of the institution of the Eucharist: Take and eat, this means my body...take and drink, this means my blood.

I looked at a copy once in a bookstore, but didn’t buy it. I had read about in a book by Arnold Lunn.


124 posted on 03/01/2014 2:49:02 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

“A movie is not “the Bible.” It’s a movie!”

The Bible is not a ‘screen play’ It is the WORD, Who existed before time, Who created heaven and earth, Who died for our sins.

We, as believers, have a responsibility to see that the WORD is kept HOLY because HE is HOLY.

For the script to include “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life” and leave out “No man cometh to the Father, but through Me” is deliberate.

Woe to those who condone artistic revisions when it comes to the basic tenants of our faith.


125 posted on 03/01/2014 2:56:14 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

tenets


126 posted on 03/01/2014 4:15:27 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

The way you’re carrying on, you’d think the producers had launched a campaign to burn all the Bibles in the world.

No movie based on any book or any history has ever included each and every fact and each and every word spoken. It just can’t be done.

Nothing has happened to the gospels. There are still millions upon millions of copies all over the world.


127 posted on 03/01/2014 4:18:57 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

“The way you’re carrying on, you’d think the producers had launched a campaign to burn all the Bibles in the world.”

What is disturbing is how the church has embraced “Son of God” without question. New Age gurus have become the spokesman of truth.

The camel has put his head under the tent of all denominations.


128 posted on 03/01/2014 4:26:26 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever
You carry on on this and other threads as if you're the only theologian on here who has comprehension of the Bible. You spout off like the Pharisees did before Jesus put them in there place....maybe he should do the same with you. You are exalting yourself and trying to talk down to the rest of us. I would be very careful of the pretentiousness if I were you.

Look....it's a movie and no where has it been purported to be the exact Word of God replacing the existing Bibles. Give it a rest. As I've said on other threads, I see this as a way to disciple and open dialog with unbelievers and hopefully lead them to a relationship with Jesus.

129 posted on 03/01/2014 4:44:13 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

“You carry on on this and other threads”

I love the Word.


130 posted on 03/01/2014 4:48:31 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

The parts of the Bible left out by this movie are the most important parts.

Without the glorification of God and the blood atonement of Christ, the Bible is not the Bible. It’s logically incoherent to call it the Bible.


131 posted on 03/01/2014 4:54:55 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I also saw 12 Years a Slave and thought it was a great movie…..after I saw it (thankfully) the bashing of the movie started showing up and I just shake me head.
The problem I have with any film of the ilk of 12 Years is the half-truth which inheres in them. They claim to be "documentaries about slavery" - but treat exclusively of slavery of blacks by American Christians. As Thomas Sowell points out in his wonderful Black Rednecks and White Liberals, nobody ever wanted to be a slave, or to have their own friends or family enslaved. But, worldwide throughout and history, nobody ever attacked the legitimacy of institution of slavery itself until Christians, and primarily Protestants, and most especially the British - decisively rejected and delegimated slavery as an institution in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. William Wilberforce

In fact, the Emancipation Proclamation was motivated in part by the effect Lincoln knew it would have in Britain - making it impossible for Britain, never disquieted by any difficulty encountered by America, to side with the Confederacy. The reason slavery was suppressed worldwide, to the extent that it is or really ever has been, was the worldwide authority and influence of Great Britain, plus the Union Army here.

No other religion/culture ever turned against slavery in principle. Not paganism, not atheism (communism), not Hinduism, not Shintoism, not Buddhism, not Confucianism, certainly not Islam - none of them has any claim to having led the opposition to the institution of slavery. Only Christianity. The Christian slaveowners in the South were uniquely situated to be the last Christians to come to that conclusion. They were an anachronism. So ultimately, any "documentary about slavery" which focuses only on slavery by Christians is a half-truth - and a very great lie.


132 posted on 03/01/2014 5:06:59 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Without the glorification of God and the blood atonement of Christ, the Bible is not the Bible. It’s logically incoherent to call it the Bible.

The title of the movie is "Son of God" NOT "the Bible".

133 posted on 03/01/2014 5:07:46 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen
A narrator filling in the gaps would be helpful to a non-believer who has not read the Bible. I have not seen The Bible series so is Son of God a splice job of it?

The reviewer suggests there is such a narrator, at least at the start. And yes, Son of God is EXACTLY that -- the footage was filmed at the same time as The Bible miniseries. They knew they would be following up with this.

134 posted on 03/01/2014 5:09:31 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Good point.


135 posted on 03/01/2014 5:11:22 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

But to portray Jesus Christ without including the blood atonement for the sins of mankind is to portray a different Jesus Christ.

The Jesus Christ who is the son of God is not the one in this movie.


136 posted on 03/01/2014 5:14:33 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Have you seen the movie?


137 posted on 03/01/2014 6:41:15 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

‘The title of the movie is “Son of God” NOT “the Bible”.’

The Son of God and the Bible are the same.

John 1:1

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.


138 posted on 03/01/2014 6:51:21 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

And let me guess....you’re perfect! Good grief. Tell me, oh wise one, has there ever been a movie abut Jesus that passes your perfectionist expectations? One that includes every word in the Bible?


139 posted on 03/01/2014 7:04:00 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Have you seen the movie?


140 posted on 03/01/2014 10:55:08 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson