Posted on 02/07/2014 8:19:03 AM PST by Paul46360
Frequently the police will set up areas near a major incident for press to report from, but not close enough to see bodies in a wrecked car, etc.
” intrusion into more traditional private moments like a tragic car accident?...”
Hogwash, there’s nothing “private” on a public roadway. Private moment? Liberal “feelings” entering into the discussion. Insanity!
I can understand having rules about reporting on dead bodies, especially before next of kin have been notified. But I think the press always having visual access to crime scenes is an important check on police abuse.
I can understand having rules about reporting on dead bodies, especially before next of kin have been notified. But I think the press always having visual access to crime scenes is an important check on police abuse.
From the linked article it's clear this was not a large military drone.
Drones are much cheaper than news-choppers, carry no crew, have minimal fuel or only batteries aboard and are less of a threat to safety should they bump into each other. Perhaps some day, the FAA will even allow this use.
Although the cynic in me thinks no level of government will ever want civilians watching and documenting their actions...
“Was the drone there before the accident and could a drone distract a driver and cause an accident?”
There is no telling what a malicious psycho or fool could try to do with a drone...or anything else, for that matter.
Vigilance and enforcement of existing constitutional laws, not banning is the solution, IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.