Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative website shuttered after libel ruling [Free Dominion]
Ottawa Citizen ^ | January 28, 2014 | Andrew Duffy

Posted on 01/29/2014 7:14:41 AM PST by conniew

Conservative website shuttered after libel ruling

Ottawa lawyer Richard Warman wins long-running legal battle

By Andrew Duffy, OTTAWA CITIZEN January 28, 2014

OTTAWA — The online political forum, Free Dominion, has shut down after a wholesale defeat in a libel case brought by Ottawa human rights lawyer Richard Warman.

A jury concluded that Warman was maliciously defamed by four commentators on Free Dominion, a website that bills itself as “the voice of principled conservatism.”

Warman has been awarded more than $127,000 in general damages, aggravated damages, punitive damages and court costs because of 41 defamatory statements published on the conservative website in 2007.

Warman rose to prominence during the past decade by using the Canadian Human Rights Act to shut down the websites of people spreading hate speech; it made him the target of free speech advocates in the conservative blogosphere, and on websites such as Free Dominion.

In a recently released decision, Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Smith granted Warman a permanent injunction that prohibits Free Dominion from ever repeating “in any manner whatsoever” any of the 41 defamations.

The website’s operators, Connie and Mark Fournier, of Kingston, this week shut down freedominion.ca, saying they could not control what comments other people posted.

“By leaving the forum open and allowing people to comment, we’d be opening ourselves to a contempt-of-court charge,” Connie Fournier said Tuesday.

“If someone repeated one of those comments, we would be in trouble — and could even go to jail.”

The Fourniers have operated the website as a “labour of love” for the past 13 years.

“It’s really sad to be at the point where we have to shut down the political forum,” she said. “But we’ve come to the point where it would be crazy for us to keep it open: it would be too much of a risk.”

They have vowed to appeal the defamation case and have launched a campaign on Indiegogo.com to raise money for their legal costs. The campaign has so far raised $2,800 of its $25,000 goal.

The Warman case is among the first to address at trial what constitutes defamation in the caustic political blogosphere. It adds to case law that suggests the Internet does not shield anonymous posters from legal action if they wrongfully attack someone’s reputation.

On his website, Warman said the case offers lessons for anyone involved in an Internet blog or forum. Chief among them, he said, is the idea that “If you make a mistake, admit it, repair the harm, and move on.”

Connie Fournier, however, said that if the case stands on appeal it will impair the once vibrant Canadian blogosphere.

“I think this is a terrible thing for free speech on the Internet,” she said. “When people who are allowing comments on their blogs and forums look at humongous costs and damage rulings like this, at injunctions that could put them in jail, they’re not going to want to take the risk of opening their site.”

The jury found that the four defendants — Roger Smith, Jason Bertucci, Connie and Mark Fournier — had been “malicious, high-handed and oppressive” in their conduct. Justice Smith also found the defendants had acted unreasonably by refusing to accept Warman’s offer to settle the case for $5,000 each.

Warman had to fight in court to obtain the identifies of those anonymous posters who had left defamatory comments on Free Dominion. The case dragged on for six years, culminating in a three-week trial before a six-person jury.

The Fourniers have never apologized or issued a retraction about the statements found to be defamatory.

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anonymous; canada; canadahumanrights; censorship; defamation; freedominion; freespeech; libel; moralabsolutes; posters; richardwarman; tyranny; unfreedominion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-351 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2014 7:14:41 AM PST by conniew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conniew
I remember them from years ago ... completely forgot about 'em 'til today.

shame

2 posted on 01/29/2014 7:16:00 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conniew

Very sorry to learn of this Connie.

Please continue to contribute on this site (you and Mark).

Best regards,

‘Pod.


3 posted on 01/29/2014 7:16:31 AM PST by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conniew

pretty effing sad situation


4 posted on 01/29/2014 7:16:54 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conniew
The jury now has to face the judgment and rebuke of the LORD for their unjust ruling.
5 posted on 01/29/2014 7:18:10 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conniew

Kanukistan. Poor buggers.


6 posted on 01/29/2014 7:18:58 AM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conniew

So much for thinking CA is just like the USA except for having to add “eh?” at the end of sentences. Guess that old saw about the interdependency of the rights delineated in the Bill of Rights is actually spot on.


7 posted on 01/29/2014 7:19:09 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

I didn’t forget about them. They have been in my thoughts.

So I guess FaceBook, Twitter, all the newspapers, and all the other places that allow people to speak their mind are now subject to this ruling. (Actually, I realize this is Canada, but these internet sites can be accessed from Canada, so they can be taken into court too.)

This is complete B. S. It’s merely designed to quash Conservative contribution to the public debate. I’ll bet this guy is a real douche bag.


8 posted on 01/29/2014 7:19:16 AM PST by DoughtyOne (AMNESTY is job none...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
It's getting to the point normal people can not speak publically.

The only ones sanctioned are 'connected' ...

Being connected requires kneepads.

You can bring your own or purchase what you need at the commisary.

9 posted on 01/29/2014 7:19:53 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conniew

I’d love to read what these “malicious, high-handed and oppressive” statements were.


10 posted on 01/29/2014 7:19:57 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts ("The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conniew

WHOA! Thanks for being/posting here, connie. BTTT!


11 posted on 01/29/2014 7:20:17 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lion Den Dan

You think it’s not going to eventually happen here?


12 posted on 01/29/2014 7:20:44 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

We will contribute here! We are coming back to our roots. It was an interesting experiment to see if a FR-style board could exist in Canada.

I guess we have our answer.


13 posted on 01/29/2014 7:22:01 AM PST by conniew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Just a matter of when!


14 posted on 01/29/2014 7:22:48 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conniew

bkmk


15 posted on 01/29/2014 7:23:21 AM PST by Faith65 (Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conniew

I would say let them reopen in a country where free speech is allowed, but I am not sure where that would be anymore.


16 posted on 01/29/2014 7:23:35 AM PST by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Only if the Socialist Democrats succeed in repealing the 2nd Amendment,
then the 1st. A battle they will never win.
17 posted on 01/29/2014 7:23:41 AM PST by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
What you have on display here is the key difference between a nation that had to win their independence through blood and toil and one which had their independence handed to them.

Never forget that, nor forget that we are not far from going down the same road if we continue to buy tyranny by the drink.

18 posted on 01/29/2014 7:24:45 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

One of the main issues in this case was that of liability of forum owners in Canada. If someone anonymously posts a comment on your forum that is later deemed to be defamatory, as the forum operator you walk into court assumed to be guilty, malicious and damages against the plaintiff are assumed. To make matters worse, as the forum operators, the defenses of fair comment and honestly held belief are not available to you. As part of the sentence for our horrible crime of allowing people to post their political opinions, we have now been barred by the court from ever operating a forum or blog where the public can post comments, for the rest of our lives.

Accusation equals guilt and there is no defense, even though you did not author the words yourself.

In Ontario, defamation is anything that is remotely negative about someone.


19 posted on 01/29/2014 7:24:56 AM PST by Entropy Squared (The Rush to Chaos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
I’d love to read what these “malicious, high-handed and oppressive” statements were.

If we post them here we will go to prison.

20 posted on 01/29/2014 7:26:22 AM PST by Entropy Squared (The Rush to Chaos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson