Skip to comments.
New Obamacare Bombshell - Rpt: No System Yet For Exchange Payment -The Kelly File
http://www.youtube.com ^
| December 3, 2013
| You Tube
Posted on 12/03/2013 6:48:59 PM PST by Whenifhow
New Obamacare Bombshell - Rpt: No System Yet For Exchange Payment -The Kelly File
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enrollment; insurance; obama; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
1
posted on
12/03/2013 6:48:59 PM PST
by
Whenifhow
To: Ray76
2
posted on
12/03/2013 6:50:15 PM PST
by
Whenifhow
To: Whenifhow
This is not a new bombshell. For weeks the experts have said the back end portion of the web site has not been created
. the accounting and payment side. That meant that paying for your policy or getting payment from your policy is impossible. This accounts for an estimated 45 to 55 % of the over all task and is part of the fundamental functionality. this is a joke and designed only to steal your identity
3
posted on
12/03/2013 6:51:23 PM PST
by
Nifster
To: Whenifhow
Maybe Pelosi hasn’t read that part yet?
4
posted on
12/03/2013 6:51:45 PM PST
by
Graewoulf
(Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: Graewoulf
I don’t think Miss Blinkey CAN read!
5
posted on
12/03/2013 6:52:32 PM PST
by
acapesket
To: Whenifhow
It was NEVER designed to work!
The Democrats don't want it to work.
Only idiots and the evil voted for Obama, or ANY of the Democrats.
They've lied to us, constantly, and really are
"Collapsing the System". And now, these "Useful IDIOTS" who voted for them, are buying the lies that "Obamacare was designed to work." ?
It was designed to fail from the start.
THEN ... THEY GO TO THE
"SINGLE-PAYER SYSTEM".
They've been sucking our wallets dry for over four years now on the "Obamacare" LIE.
AND NOW THEY WANT MORE TAXES ?
Our Founding Fathers would have hung them already!
Lets review:
Who was it that cut future funding for Medicare by $575 billion?
...the president and the Democratic Party successfully bamboozle voters... The 2012 election could turn on this falsehood.
The truth is that the Obama health law reduces future funding for Medicare by $575 billion over the next 10 years ...
Mr. Obama and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius frequently make that false claim.
Indeed, even Medicare's mailings to seniors repeat the claim that reducing spending on Medicare will make it more financially secure for future years.
The fact is that Mr. Obama's law raids Medicare.
Who was it that moved Medicare Trust Funds out of the "trust box" and into the General Revenue, replacing them with Government I.O.U.s?
Who was it that expanded Medicare and Medicaid to cover many, many more people than it was originally designed to cover?
The History of Medicare
In 1965, the Social Security Act established both Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare was a responsibility of the Social Security Administration (SSA), while Federal assistance to the State Medicaid programs was administered by the Social and Rehabilitation Service (SRS). SSA and SRS were agencies in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW). In 1977, the Health Care Financing Administration was created under HEW to effectively coordinate Medicare and Medicaid. In 1980 HEW was divided into the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
The first U.S. President to propose a prepaid health insurance plan was Harry S. Truman [DEMOCRAT]. On November 19, 1945, in a special message to Congress, President Truman outlined a comprehensive, prepaid medical insurance plan for all people through the Social Security system. The plan included doctors and hospitals, and nursing, laboratory, and dental services; it was dubbed "National Health Insurance." Furthermore, medical insurance benefits for needy people were to be financed from Federal revenues.
Over the years, lawmakers narrowed the field of health insurance recipients largely to social security beneficiaries. A national survey found that only 56 percent of those 65 years of age or older had health insurance. President John F. Kennedy [DEMOCRAT] pressed legislators for health insurance for the aged. However, it wasn't until 1965 that President Lyndon B. Johnson signed H.R. 6675 (The Social Security Act of 1965; PL 89-97) to provide health insurance for the elderly and the poor.
On July 30, 1965, President Johnson signed the Medicare and Medicaid Bill (Title XVIII and Title XIX of the Social Security Act) in Independence, Missouri in the presence of former President Truman, who received the first Medicare card at the ceremony; Lady Bird Johnson, Vice-President Hubert Humphrey, and Mrs. Truman also were present. President Johnson remarked: "We marvel not simply at the passage of this Bill but that it took so many years to pass it."
Medicare extended health coverage to almost all Americans aged 65 or older. About 19 million beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare in the first year of the program. Medicaid provided access to health care services for certain low-income persons and expanded the existing Federal-State welfare structure that assisted the poor.
The 1972 Social Security Amendments expanded Medicare to provide coverage to two additional high risk groups disabled persons receiving cash benefits for 24 months under the social security program and persons suffering from end-stage renal disease.
...(continued at link)
So Democrats,
Sen Mark Kirk's
statement Thursday, Dec 1, 2011 ...
"There are 55 million Social Security beneficiaries that will see little or no extra cash from this 2012 tax holiday; instead, the dedicated payroll contributions meant to pay for future benefits are being diverted from the Trust Fund
and replaced with Treasury debt that does not even have a AAA credit rating.
Social Security was designed to be independent and free from the danger of Congressional manipulation,
and maintaining the firewall between the Social Security Trust Fund and general government funding is the best way to maintain the solvency of this important program.
Neither bill protects the Social Security Trust Fund
so I voted no. "
It's not our fault that
DEMOCRATS raided the Social Security Trust Fund. Let's remember ...
Not ALL are to blame for the empty lock box.
It's the Democrats Communists.
Let's take a deeper look.
Okay, then the DEMOCRATS need to shut up!!!
6
posted on
12/03/2013 6:52:49 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Nifster
Nothing that can’t be cured by hiring a corps of humans to write checks.
And it helps the unemployment stats!
7
posted on
12/03/2013 6:52:58 PM PST
by
nascarnation
(Wish everyone see a "Gay Kwanzaa")
To: Whenifhow
I think that the term “WORK-AROUND” should be replaced with the more honest and accurate “REACH-AROUND”.
8
posted on
12/03/2013 6:53:24 PM PST
by
Howie66
(Molon Labe, Traitors!)
To: Whenifhow
They’ve been told it would be free healthcare. Here it is.
9
posted on
12/03/2013 6:53:36 PM PST
by
Bosco
(Remember how you felt on September 11?)
To: Nifster
To: Nifster
Note well: You are not signed up until you make a payment. And you cannot make a payment, because they haven’t created that part of the system. It seems pretty obvious that not a single American has yet signed up for Obamacare. Not one.
To: Nifster
To: Whenifhow; Nifster
I’m watching her now. She had 2-3 segments on this. Her program repeats at midnight for anyone interested.
Isn’t it time for the Dems to talk Captain Queeg off the ledge and repeal this? He’s not mentally stable enough to bring himself in.
Did you see his presser today?
13
posted on
12/03/2013 6:59:32 PM PST
by
thouworm
To: ClearCase_guy
14
posted on
12/03/2013 7:00:06 PM PST
by
Nifster
To: thouworm
oh yeah
. the man is delusional but that was evident during hs run for the first term and that ridiculous roman coliseum look he had in Denver. He truly believes he is God. The Almighty would beg to differ
15
posted on
12/03/2013 7:01:22 PM PST
by
Nifster
To: Whenifhow
"Payment syatems?"
"Unicorns don't need no steenkin' payment sytems!"
16
posted on
12/03/2013 7:02:23 PM PST
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
To: Nifster
The bombshell is that the government is allowing the insurance companies to “estimate” what they are owed, and then the administration will cut them a check. If there is a dispute, it will be trued up later.
Sort of an honor system.
Trust the insurance companies and the government to do the right thing with the taxpayer’s money.
I’m sure that will work out well.
To: Whenifhow
IMO they need to stop reporting all the exact flaws of the system. It gives them a list of things to fix. Let the system fail on its own. It’s the will of The People. If the system gets fixed we have to hand over 1/3 more of our income that we don’t have because of the horrible economy and hyperinflation and get chipped which really invites a level of intrusion into our privacy never seen before.
To: Palmetto Patriot
anything this admin (or really any big government) does is bogus from the get go
this admin seems to take pride in being the world’s biggest screw ups
19
posted on
12/03/2013 7:05:07 PM PST
by
Nifster
To: Palmetto Patriot
Does the insured have to pay extra if the subsidy to high or get a refund if to low
it means the insurer has to contact the enrollee and get payment..this is insane
we could have just given the uninsured a voucher and said go buy insurance..
20
posted on
12/03/2013 7:08:25 PM PST
by
Hojczyk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson