Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC considering Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin as debate moderators?
Hotair ^ | 08/14/2013 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 08/15/2013 7:58:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

If Reince Priebus wants to apply pressure on broadcasters to reform both the presidenial primary debates and their own attempts to monetize Hillary Clinton for their own benefit, this is certainly one way to do it. Paul Bedard at the Washington Examiner picks up on a comment last week from RNC Communications Director Sean Spicer, who said in a Sirius XM interview that there are other fish in the sea — and Bedard’s sources say they are very big fish indeed:

Miffed that their candidates were singled out for personal questions or CNN John King’s “This or That,” when he asked candidates quirky questions like “Elvis or Johnny Cash,” GOP insiders tell Secrets that they are considering other choices, even a heavyweight panel of radio bigs Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin.

They told Secrets that they are eager to bring in questioners who understand Republican policies and beliefs and who have the ability to get candidates to differentiate their positions on core conservative values.

The move comes as several conservatives are pressuring the party to have Limbaugh, Hannity and Levin ask the debate questions. “It makes a lot of sense. We’d get a huge viewership, they’d make a lot of news and maybe have some fun too,” said one of the advocates of the radio trio hosting debates.

The benefits of this are readily apparent. These three radio hosts command large audiences, far larger than a typical presidential-primary debate would attract. Furthermore, they would attract the people that the GOP most needs to energize for a national election — grassroots conservatives and highly-engaged voters. Partnering with these three would vastly improve the perception of the RNC, both for partnering with favorite New Media voices and for continued defiance to the mainstream media.

That doesn’t mean there aren’t some dangers involved in this strategy, though, and perhaps none more than the larger-than-life nature of the talk show hosts themselves. Especially with Limbaugh and maybe Levin as well, the candidates might come across as tepid and colorless in close comparison. (Think of it in terms of the danger of picking a more telegenic and charismatic running mate for a nominee.) Limbaugh, Levin, and Hannity are entertainers and activists, who know how to work on the edge to drive debate and change. The candidates may end up having to follow them to the edge to keep up if they aren’t disciplined enough to keep their balance, and that may produce some problems in a general election.

At the very least, it would be fun to try that in a format that allows candidates real time to answer in detail. It can’t be worse than what we have now, anyway. I’d still argue that the best format would be to eliminate moderators altogether and allow small groups of candidates — no more than four at a time, and preferably only two or three — discuss issues amongst themselves so as to get the most substantial look at their principles and approaches. Maybe the RNC can do a few of both kinds, while keeping control of the debates entirely in-house.

Update (AP): Dave Weigel argued last week that conservative moderators would make for more compelling Republican debates. Would the entire field participate, though? Mark Levin told Cavuto a few days ago that he’d do what he could to ensure that Christie’s not the nominee; Limbaugh and Hannity may end up opposing Christie too. Would Christie show up for a debate moderated by them under those circumstances?

Update (Ed): I think Christie in particular would feel compelled to attend. His attractiveness is based on his blunt style and willingness to take on opponents. If he ran away from Levin, it would undermine his entire raison d’être for Republican voters. I think that’s also true for other candidates, too; voters would ask, “If he/she can’t handle Levin …”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: marklevin; moderators; rushlimbaugh; seanhannity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

1 posted on 08/15/2013 7:58:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My vote is for Levin. With his knowledge of the Constitution, he would make the pretenders look stupid.


2 posted on 08/15/2013 8:00:31 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Would rather see Chris Wallace, Charles Payne or Larry Kudlow.


3 posted on 08/15/2013 8:01:35 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’d like to see Mark Steyn moderating a presidential debate.


4 posted on 08/15/2013 8:03:05 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I would agree w Levin, and propose Hugh Hewitt.

Hannity? He's a great American, but would be too predictable for the forum.

5 posted on 08/15/2013 8:04:08 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I agree on Levin. He’d stick to his guns under the spotlight.


6 posted on 08/15/2013 8:04:09 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The fact of the matter is anyone can pretend to be a conservative long enough to make it through a debate. The problem is that our media won’t speak to the BS a candidate has pulled that proves they’re pretending.


7 posted on 08/15/2013 8:04:13 AM PDT by TheZMan (Buy more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The time to fight was last year, but Mr. nicey nicey go along don’t rock the boat was the nominee and thus head of the party. Dope!


8 posted on 08/15/2013 8:06:01 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Limbaugh, maybe. Hannity? not on your life.

Levin, DEFINITELY!!!


9 posted on 08/15/2013 8:06:17 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Chris Wallace??? If you want someone from Fox Brett Baier would be as far better choice.


10 posted on 08/15/2013 8:06:22 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

Mark Levin would be excellent if only to watch the lapdog media reaction. It’s about time!


11 posted on 08/15/2013 8:06:47 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

OK


12 posted on 08/15/2013 8:06:48 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

For equality, both party’s debates need to be hosted by these guys, just as they are now and in the past, have always been hosted by their liberal versions.


13 posted on 08/15/2013 8:07:13 AM PDT by ansel12 ( The difference between libertarianism and conservatism is radical social leftism, not economics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Yeah, like that's gonna happen.
What network is gonna “host” a debate with one of these as moderator? Even IF one does, the RATS will simply decline to appear.
Remember, Presidential debates are WHOLY a construct of TV. Before 1960 there was NEVER a Presidential debate.
14 posted on 08/15/2013 8:10:04 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
How about Neil Cavuto or Michelle Malkin?
15 posted on 08/15/2013 8:11:02 AM PDT by hummingbird (THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He's got a great plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Had to google Payne and found this:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/06/24/fox-analyst-charles-payne-was-paid-to-push-now/194562

The other two guys are your typical pro-amnesty types.


16 posted on 08/15/2013 8:12:02 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Steyn as moderator would be must-see TV!


17 posted on 08/15/2013 8:12:24 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Great. GOP establishment wants one of the establishment hacks to keep any debate within the accepted subject matter. Don’t fool yourselves into thinking that all of them aren’t bought and paid for.


18 posted on 08/15/2013 8:12:32 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Would Christie show up for a debate moderated by them under those circumstances?

So? All candidates in the 2012 GOP primary showed up for debates moderated by all-marxist panels/moderators...you know damn well they were voting democrat/communist on Election Day.

19 posted on 08/15/2013 8:12:53 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

Hewitt’s another pro-amnesty guy.


20 posted on 08/15/2013 8:13:24 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

I like—Malkin would keep them in line!


21 posted on 08/15/2013 8:14:06 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

I’d like Brett Baier and/or Brett Hume.


22 posted on 08/15/2013 8:14:59 AM PDT by hummingbird (THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He's got a great plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I vote Levin.


23 posted on 08/15/2013 8:16:23 AM PDT by RedMDer (http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Partnering with these three would vastly improve the perception of the RNC

The perception of the RNC would improve if only they would stand for something. The party is deeply confused and conflicted at a time when the country needs clear thought leadership and direction. There is a huge opportunity to lead the way out of the mess the Democrats have created.

24 posted on 08/15/2013 8:16:37 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Defeat Tyranny!
Start Here!


25 posted on 08/15/2013 8:17:54 AM PDT by RedMDer (http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Steyn as moderator would be must-see TV!

Agreed!

26 posted on 08/15/2013 8:18:40 AM PDT by varon ( cum tyrannis para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

That’s what I was thinking, too!


27 posted on 08/15/2013 8:18:46 AM PDT by hummingbird (THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He's got a great plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker; hummingbird

Malkin’s used to interviewing. I’m a huge Steyn fan but she’d be better than him for this.

Levin would be great also. He would not take any crap or weaseling around the issues the way politicians love to do.


28 posted on 08/15/2013 8:21:31 AM PDT by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

I would go with Levin only because libs do not know him that well and as the foremost constitutional scholar, the libs won’t be able to touch him.

Hannity and Limbaugh would be ok, but the libs can and have attacked them. Of course attack can be countered with, “read the transcript, Candy.”


29 posted on 08/15/2013 8:21:58 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The reason we own guns is to protect ourselves from those wanting to take our guns from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: expat1000

Except if Rubio’s one of the candidates—then Mark might go to mush.


30 posted on 08/15/2013 8:28:05 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Brett and Brit and pro-ammnesty GOPe guys.


31 posted on 08/15/2013 8:28:37 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: expat1000

I agree.

But Steyn is more entertaining.


32 posted on 08/15/2013 8:29:53 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Personally, I would prefer Michael Savage. When he’s off his meds, he is entertaining as hell.


33 posted on 08/15/2013 8:33:23 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The RNC is trying to stay relevant as it becomes increasingly clear that the GOP is moving leftward.

Why not put this story out to get us talking about something else other than amnesty or the rigged primary process to give the 2016 nomination to a RINO.

Frankly, the Hannity’s, Limbaugh’s and Levin’s should be asking the questions-tough conservative questions of the RINO’s in the if they want to do any good.


34 posted on 08/15/2013 8:37:26 AM PDT by Nextrush (A BALANCED BUDGET NOW AND PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN ARE AT THE TOP OF MY LIST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

I would love to see Steyn as well, Levin 2nd but would actually love to see for Limbaugh for some reason as well. =)

I can’t really stand Hannity. =\


35 posted on 08/15/2013 8:39:08 AM PDT by the_boy_who_got_lost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh please not Hannity, please not Hannity.

We need to get our prayer warriors working on this.


36 posted on 08/15/2013 8:48:03 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (People are idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Does Reince Priebus strike anyone as having the balls to do this? It’s all theatre.....


37 posted on 08/15/2013 8:48:08 AM PDT by capydick (''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

RE: Oh please not Hannity, please not Hannity.

Let not your heart be troubled .... :)


38 posted on 08/15/2013 8:49:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Michael Savage. When he’s off his meds, he is entertaining as hell.

I thought that was when he was ON his meds.

39 posted on 08/15/2013 8:49:58 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (People are idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Hewitt’s another pro-amnesty guy.

Ugh, really?

Dang.

Hugh, you are/should be better than this.

Okay, forget Hugh-the-amnesty-wobbly.

.

40 posted on 08/15/2013 8:50:07 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“With his knowledge of the Constitution, he would make the pretenders look stupid.”

You mean like he defended the Constitution against the phony birth certificate and other phony documents?

Oh wait he actually attacked those of us who are concerned about this, but none of them did anything, and Hannity is a moderate NOT a republican so should not be invited, and he isn’t constervative.


41 posted on 08/15/2013 8:52:52 AM PDT by stockpirate (American taxpayer's are: The New World Order slaves for the collective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog

All three of those mentioned are bought and paid for no doubt, just look at how all them responded to the birther issue, is was NEVER covered in any meaningful manner.

I lost some respect for all three of them after that.


42 posted on 08/15/2013 8:57:39 AM PDT by stockpirate (American taxpayer's are: The New World Order slaves for the collective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Can’t we just have an internet debate? Bypass the MSM altogether.


43 posted on 08/15/2013 9:09:37 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I vote for Levin, also. But why will they choose only one? Why not the three? Also, there is no reason they cannot include Newt in it, also.


44 posted on 08/15/2013 9:12:18 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Newt? No. He’s almost as bad as Hannity.


45 posted on 08/15/2013 9:13:29 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why only one? We have to sit through countless debates moderated by the enemies of conservatism. Why not give each of them a debate to run?

Rush, Levin, Hannity, Steyn, Malkin, they all deserve a shot. Shut the liberals out completely.


46 posted on 08/15/2013 9:17:19 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Army dad. And damned proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

There’s no way the GOP elite let Levin within 10 miles of moderating a debate. He’d destroy the big government RINO types within minutes of the debate starting.


47 posted on 08/15/2013 9:19:15 AM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SCHROLL

But it sure would be fun to watch.


48 posted on 08/15/2013 9:21:29 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

It’s a farce and far cry to call what goes on a ‘debate’. They are 90sec. sound bite machines.

I could care whom moderates, I want to see a 3-5min. debate per subject, with back-n-forth follow-up.

I’m tired of the ‘wave the American flag, apple time, good time rock-n-roll’ quip, yet with nothing of substance WHY one should vote for XYZ.


49 posted on 08/15/2013 9:24:14 AM PDT by i_robot73 (Gov't always start as MAY and SHOULD, but soon becomes one of WILL and SHALL. Never let them START.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Play the whole thing on those guys’ radio shows each time and they’ll get a plenty big audience.


50 posted on 08/15/2013 9:27:14 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson