Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Norway ponders conservatism and the future of the welfare state
Hotair ^ | 08/11/2013 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 08/11/2013 8:13:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Parts of Northern Europe have had a bit better luck than some other sectors across the pond during the economic troubles of the past decade, but they still have had to deal with the legacy of welfare states and costly entitlement programs. Earlier this year, Mary Katharine looked at Sweden’s attempts to deal with rising debt and costly entitlements, while Erika covered some steps being taken in Denmark to deal with their long term financial issues arising from the same core issues. This sense of realism and worry about the future seems to be spreading across the region, and John Fund has a great analysis of current events in Norway, where conservatives seem poised to take control of the government there for the first time in ages.

If polls taken over the last year are accurate, the eight-year-old Labor-party government of Jens Stoltenberg is headed for a landslide defeat.

Normally, you would think it would be a shoo-in for reelection. Labor’s social democrats have long thought of themselves as the natural party of government — Labor has been the leading party in Norway for all but 16 of the last 78 years. While much of Europe is wracked by recession, Norway’s economy grew by 3 percent last year, and the unemployment rate is only 3.5 percent. Norway’s GDP per capita is now over $60,000 a year.

But Norwegians appear likely to elect a conservative coalition government for the first time in over a decade. Polls show the Conservative party leading with 32 percent of the vote, which should give it 58 seats in the 169-seat parliament, a dramatic increase from 2005, when it won only 23 seats. The Labor party has about 30 percent of the vote, and its left-wing allied parties are floundering. The Progress party — a populist party that supports low taxes and stricter limits on immigration, and that worries about Muslim extremism – has about 16 percent of the vote, and it and the Conservatives, together with their smaller allies, look to have a clear majority in the new Parliament. Both the Conservative party and the Progress party are headed by women — former local-government minister Erna Solberg and economist Siv Jensen, respectively — making it very likely that Norway will soon have its second woman prime minister.

We don’t tend to hear much about Norway over here, aside from one tragic shooting by a madman, but that’s likely because things have been going fairly smoothly for them. As Fund notes, the discovery of massive oil deposits off their coast in the sixties led to the formation of a state operated oil company which generates more than a third of the country’s entire revenue. The lion’s share of those profits go straight into Norway’s Government Pension Fund, doled out from there to an extremely generous welfare program. This report provides details of just some of the benefits being funded by the government, including free healthcare, dental care until 19 years of age, and cut rate prescriptions. They also offer essentially unlimited disability payments, pensions for retirees, survivor benefits and more. So in such an apparently successful socialist paradise, why would the voters suddenly turn to the conservatives?

As Fund notes, there is a growing realization and public discussion of the fact that, “the oil won’t last forever.” And with an ever increasing – and aging – army of pensioners to fully support, if either the supply or the profitable demand for oil were to begin to plunge, the system would collapse under its own weight. Rather than waiting for the wolves to actually arrive at the door, it appears that the citizens are actually thinking of planning for the future. Not in any “radical” and massive ways, mind you, but even baby steps can get you started on the road to redemption. If nothing else, this might make the Norwegian elections worth watching this year. Stay tuned.

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bankruptcy; conservatism; lessons; norway; socialism; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
"I would not call Hitler Jugend victims."

I understand your position, but the nazi adults took kids - starting at age 10 - and psychologically and physically manipulated them until they created the fanatics the allies eventually had to face. They were nazi creations. That's why I consider them victims. Having said that, had I been around in WWII, I would have unhesitatingly shot any hitler youth that did not immediately drop his weapons and surrender.

21 posted on 08/11/2013 3:07:34 PM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Impy

True, the PP does seem to be a bit closer to our kind of conservative I guess.

22 posted on 08/11/2013 3:24:13 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: riri

Yes, would you rather have a percapita income of $60,000. and a twelve dollar cup of coffee or the 1956 per capita average as it was in America and a five cent cup of coffee? I would guess that the latter was a better deal. I was born in 1944 in South Carolina, my father was a carpenter and we ate meat three times a day most of the time. At least no one who has ever seen me has suspected that I was ever undernourished. I think 1956 was the year that I saw the man I considered my Godfather become very angry because he was charged a whole dime for a cup of coffee instead of the nickel he was used to paying. He thought it was outrageous to be charged enough for a cup of coffee to pay for half a gallon of gasoline. In those days my father could afford to buy ice cream cones for himself, my mother and his four sons. The total cost was no more than sixty cents for all six and that was for double dip cones. Who can afford six cones of ice cream now? It would cost what my father spent in a month at the grocery store in 1956.

23 posted on 08/11/2013 3:32:59 PM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

I tend to think of victimization as being from the individual’s point of view. Most of the boys did not think of themselves as victims, and many were enthusiastic and proud to be supporting their homeland.

For many it was an early recognition of their maturity, even adulthood, and they were destined to be the future leaders of their country.

24 posted on 08/11/2013 3:36:04 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Be Brave! Fear is just the opposite of Nar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There’s not much to be proud of in how long it took to pull their head out of the sand, but at least they’re doing it now.

25 posted on 08/11/2013 3:38:24 PM PDT by OldNewYork (Biden '13. Impeach now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
I have no doubt you are correct. 60k makes the average Norwegian sound rich to the average American who has never spent time in Scandinavia and has ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA how expensive "free" makes everything.

Thought, I am the first to say we are rapidly catching up and we have none of the up side. At least they feel like they get something for all that taxation--we just get to bend over.

26 posted on 08/11/2013 4:09:06 PM PDT by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson