Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Juror B-37 on CNN Anderson Cooper Now (8:00 p.m. EDT)
Monday, July 15, 2013 | Kristinn

Posted on 07/15/2013 5:12:50 PM PDT by kristinn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 461-466 next last
To: tanknetter

Still looking...I’m sure it won’t be long


381 posted on 07/15/2013 7:53:55 PM PDT by Kaosinla (The More the Plans Fail. The More the Planners Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

>>>>and any who are not, get insulted...<<<<

WELL!!!!!!! I have NEVer BEEN so insulted!! [stomp stomp stomp...door slam!!]

just kidding...good point in your post...I had the same concern.


382 posted on 07/15/2013 7:55:09 PM PDT by viaveritasvita ("The One who reigns forever, He is a Friend of mine, the G-d of angel armies is always by my side.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

right, and the other 3 were for guilty(2 of mansluaghter, 1 of 2nd degree)


383 posted on 07/15/2013 7:58:20 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

FYI. .tomorrow night Cooper will have more of his interview with this juror.


384 posted on 07/15/2013 7:58:32 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

OK. I thought you were referring to Rachel, lol.


385 posted on 07/15/2013 7:59:48 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade; spacejunkie2001

>> ...any woman worth her intellectual salt can see the point behind such concerns

This *rational man*, however, can see the sheer idiocy of clinging to such concerns AFTER they have been P-R-O-V-E-N completely unfounded. “Gee, we were on the precipice, half of the women were emotional therefore we ARE right!” doesn’t cut it when the thinking women WON, proving they were nowhere near the precipice of this supposed emotional abyss.

Ah, I don’t know... there must be *some* explanation for your persistent cluelessness. Are you blonde, maybe? :-)


386 posted on 07/15/2013 8:01:01 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

she lost all credibility. No voice alteration, EAsily voice recognized.

it is only going to be days before she is recognized.


387 posted on 07/15/2013 8:02:41 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

the fact it was 3-2-1 does not speak well for them.


388 posted on 07/15/2013 8:04:11 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Horsehockey.

Again, I’ll ask: different jury, 3 white men, 3 black men.

What’s the initial vote? What’s the outcome?


389 posted on 07/15/2013 8:05:09 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Mark Geragos was on CNN the other day talking about during Jury selection the prosecution had 2 jurors struck but the defense used their batson challenge(basically a term where they say the jurors were struck because of race) and the judge apparently agreed and had the two put back on the jury.

i’d like to hear more about that and I’d bet this B37 was one of the two who was put back on


390 posted on 07/15/2013 8:07:53 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

that would come in on a civil case.


391 posted on 07/15/2013 8:10:11 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

I have already heard one pundit say she thought it was deliberate sabotage by Serino.


392 posted on 07/15/2013 8:11:55 PM PDT by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

she went to mr alternative lifestly cooper?


393 posted on 07/15/2013 8:14:16 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Did she say all 6 believed the lead detective when he said he thought George was telling the truth? Was that a big part of their deliberations? Wish to hell she hadn’t said that because the “judge” told them to disregard what he said because it was speculation. So if it was used to acquit Zimmerman is that grounds to have him retried? I don’t think it is. How many times have I heard lawyers say it’s silly for a judge to tell a jury to disregard something they just heard because it’s like putting the cat back in the bag? Is this a big deal or what? Anyone know?


394 posted on 07/15/2013 8:14:26 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
she lost all credibility. No voice alteration, EAsily voice recognized.

it is only going to be days before she is recognized.

Did you mean to say she lost all anonimity?

395 posted on 07/15/2013 8:16:54 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

nope...knew of him....never met him in school...knew of him cause he played some football...he hooked up as an employee after he was booted from society


396 posted on 07/15/2013 8:17:10 PM PDT by advertising guy (Phoenix...........where a prick in the butt ain't sexual.............it's a cactus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

also, I think in time it will come to be realized that this case was decided the day the jury was selected without any blacks on it. at that point a hung jury was the best the state could hope for. they were never getting a conviction.


397 posted on 07/15/2013 8:17:41 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy
he hooked up as an employee

Please elaborate.

398 posted on 07/15/2013 8:18:53 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

click my name...go to forum it’s there already


399 posted on 07/15/2013 8:21:44 PM PDT by advertising guy (Phoenix...........where a prick in the butt ain't sexual.............it's a cactus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

I meant credibility just for appearing on anderson cooper. The anonymity is a farce.


400 posted on 07/15/2013 8:23:45 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 461-466 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson