1. Didn't care for Andrew Garfield as Spiderman.
2. Racist Jamie Foxx as Electro? LOL
3. A gay Spiderman? Please!
I took my grandsons to see the first one. Won't be going anywhere near this one.
Posted on 07/11/2013 6:06:24 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
Behold the first official picture of Jamie Foxx as Spider-Man's new nemesis in The Amazing Spider-Man 2. In other news, Andrew Garfield is open to making Peter Parker gay by swapping Mary Jane out for a boy, Mark Johnson.
(Excerpt) Read more at io9.com ...
1. Didn't care for Andrew Garfield as Spiderman.
2. Racist Jamie Foxx as Electro? LOL
3. A gay Spiderman? Please!
I took my grandsons to see the first one. Won't be going anywhere near this one.
I am really tired of all this faggot nonsense.
Remakes of cartoon characters. Has Hollywood lost their imagination, they have nothing they can write up that is original?
Hollywood is so invested in perversion, hatred of whites, ridicule and plain violence (the kind they hypocritically denigrate at parties with Imam Obama).
I’ll be damned if I ever watch anything with hater Jamie Fox (he doesn’t deserve the second X - he’s too low rent)in it.
“Has Hollywood lost their imagination?”
Yep, when they started making movies out of little kids stories (hansel and gretel and snow white) I knew there resources were bankrupt. Redbox is loaded with low budget horror flicks and rerun movies.
HEY-EY!
Jamie, when you gonna do the Wanda movie you promised?
Your prayers have been answered ...
Tonight on SyFy ... don't miss it!
The poster is made even more perfect by misspelling Ziering’s name.
There was absolutely no reason to respin this series. None. I refuse to watch any of it.
DVR locked & loaded. Cannot wait!
They represent 10% of the population.
But it seems that we need to have every third character be gay these days.
Not an advocate of the gay lifestyle at all. They have always been around, and I guess some always will (unless you live under Sharia law.)
I liked it a lot more when the movies and TV were based on plot, writing, and generally good story telling. Unless the movie or show is specially about being gay, I am not sure how relevant penis placement is to moving a story forward.
It is gratuitous and not very “marketing” oriented. By that I mean, the character being “gay” will not bring more people to the theater. However, there are many movie goers (like me) who will avoid the movie because the writing sucks and makes sexuality prominent when doesn’t add to the story.
They will be sorry.
I agree with everything except the 10%. I think it is lower than that. If tv represented reality, 60% of people would be homosexuals, White men would be fat and stupid, all blacks are cool, and women fix everything their stupid husbands do.
“Remakes of cartoon characters. Has Hollywood lost their imagination, they have nothing they can write up that is original?”
Good point. I never see these dumbass movies. With Jammie Foxxx definitely not. Though he was great in the Ray Charles movie before this Hollywood shyte went to his head
3% at best...I live in Sewer England (thanks, Pastor!)...based on media reports; you would think this area would be overrun with sodomites. If so; they are pretty low-key.
Wonder if Foxx will get to kill any white people in this Spider-Man flick...maybe a cameo by his lord and saviour, Barack Obama. Zero appeared in Spider-Man comics just after he was elected.
I thought Ian Ziering gave up on acting to work full time as a Chippendale’s dancer ?
This insistence on normalizing homosexuality is just ridiculous. Y’know what, Stan Lee - you go right ahead and make Spiderman gay. Make him interested in a dude. Go ahead, do it. Play along with this dimwit actor’s insanity and see how that goes over at the box office.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.