Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Pentagon Confirms May Court Martial Soldiers Who Share Christian Faith
Breitbart ^ | 5/1/13

Posted on 05/01/2013 9:27:40 AM PDT by Nachum

The Pentagon has released a statement confirming that soldiers could be prosecuted for promoting their faith: "Religious proselytization is not permitted within the Department of Defense...Court martials and non-judicial punishments are decided on a case-by-case basis...”.

The statement, released to Fox News, follows a Breitbart News report on Obama administration Pentagon appointees meeting with anti-Christian extremist Mikey Weinstein to develop court-martial procedures to punish Christians in the military who express or share their faith.

(From our earlier report: Weinstein is the head of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, and says Christians--including chaplains--sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ in the military are guilty of “treason,” and of committing an act of “spiritual rape” as serious a crime as “sexual assault.” He also asserted that Christians sharing their faith in the military are “enemies of the Constitution.”)

Being convicted in a court martial means that a soldier has committed a crime under federal military law. Punishment for a court martial can include imprisonment and being dishonorably discharged from the military.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 666; antichrist; antitheism; assassination; atheismandstate; atheistsupremacists; banglist; bhodod; bhofascism; catholic; celebrateperversity; chaplains; christian; christians; communistgoals; constitution; corruption; court; culturewar; democrats; donttreadonme; fifthcolumn; fraud; freedomofreligion; freedomofspeech; fubo; gaystapotactics; godandcountry; godlesscommunists; govtabuse; guttingmilitary; homosexualagenda; husseinobama; liberalbigot; liberalfascism; martial; mikey; mikeyweinstein; military; mooselimbs; mrff; muslim; muslimbrotherhood; muslims; obama; pentagon; persecution; queerarmy; religiousliberty; secdefhagel; secularhumanism; sodomhusseinobama; spiritofantichrist; spiritualrape; splc; tyranny; ucmj; unamerican; waronliberty; waronreligion; weinstein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 461-475 next last
To: Jean2

Weinstein says he is from a Jewish-American family, with generations of service in the US military. So I imagine he wouldn’t have much time for Islamic or Wiccan preaching in the military either.

He is entitled to his view, and to campaign for secularism, but it is up to the US military, not W’s private foundation ‘Military Religious Freedom Foundation,’ to set policy.


321 posted on 05/01/2013 6:28:35 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I wonder if they’ll treat pestering homos any different?


322 posted on 05/01/2013 6:49:39 PM PDT by Rebelbase (1929-1950's, 20+years for full recovery. How long this time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: manc

Go to your happy place, manc. Clap if you believe in Tinkerbelle.

I choked up when I first read of this story. We have men and women in harm’s way and commanders without strength: medals and scrambled eggs be damned.


323 posted on 05/01/2013 6:54:14 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Interesting timing.....

http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Blog/2214/abp_chaput_america_is_mission_territorywhether_we_recognize_it_yet_or_not.aspx#.UYHJUqyhftM

“America is mission territory—whether we recognize it yet or not; whether we live in New York or Atlanta or Phoenix—and we need a new Pentecost. We need to be people who are men and women of prayer, people of courage, people of service, men and women anchored in the sacramental life of the Church.”

Is this administration afraid of one Archbishop?


324 posted on 05/01/2013 7:06:11 PM PDT by bluecat6 ("All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don't say the story isn't accurate. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Actually, the NIGHT he was first elected I burst into uncontrollable tears....and I hadn’t even worked on any election that year, as we had just moved to another state. It is VERY unsettling....


325 posted on 05/01/2013 7:08:07 PM PDT by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

‘NOR INTERFERE WITH THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF.” (Religion)


326 posted on 05/01/2013 7:09:47 PM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

I would have to say you’re an idiot. What does proselytization mean to you? That’s just a word non-religious people have dreamed up - truth is, God requires us to witness to others. Plain and simple. That’s why we’re here. And what does pestering others mean? Suggesting they look at another point of view?


327 posted on 05/01/2013 7:15:32 PM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

Huh? Are you saying that when a Christian witnesses to others that they might be “interfering” with God’s plan?

The Great Commission given to us by Christ is to “go into ALL of the World and PREACH the gospel.” Mark 16:15

I can’t possibly see how witnessing to others could possibly “interfere” with God’s plan.


328 posted on 05/01/2013 7:26:58 PM PDT by ScubieNuc (When there is no justice in the laws, justice is left to the outlaws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick

Interesting updates to wiki for the term.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proselytism&diff=552633611&oldid=22315823

Removed:

Views on the propriety of proselytism, or even [[evangelism]], differ radically. Some feel that freedom of speech should have no limits and that virtually anyone, anywhere should have the right to talk about anything they see fit. Others see all sorts of evangelism as a nuisance and an intrusion and would like to see them proscribed. Thus, Natan Lerner observes that the issue is one of a clash of rights - the right of a person to express his views versus the right of a person not to be exposed to views that he does not wish to hear.

Added:

Christianity.


329 posted on 05/01/2013 8:07:14 PM PDT by bluecat6 ("All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don't say the story isn't accurate. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6

More...

Earlier versions...

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proselytism&diff=552633611&oldid=5877831

Old:

In the [[Bible]], the word [[proselyte]] denotes a person who has converted to the [[Judaism|Jewish religion]], without overtly negative overtones. In our day, however, the connotations of the word proselytism are almost exclusively negative. Nonetheless, many people use the words interchangeably. An [[Orthodox Christianity|Orthodox]] writer, Stephen Methodius Hayes has written: “If people talk about the need for evangelism, they meet with the response, “The Orthodox church does not proselytize” as if evangelizing and proselytism were the same thing.”

Current:

==Bahá’í Faith==


330 posted on 05/01/2013 8:12:40 PM PDT by bluecat6 ("All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don't say the story isn't accurate. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

He needs to fill the ranks with sexual deviants , occultists and muslims to get his version of the SS .

I can’t stand to see what this man is doing to our military and our country.


331 posted on 05/01/2013 8:23:38 PM PDT by Lera (Proverbs 29:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Nachum.


332 posted on 05/01/2013 8:23:55 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Weinstein Quote...” Christians—including chaplains—sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ in the military are guilty of “treason,” and of committing an act of “spiritual rape”.... as serious a crime as “sexual assault.”... He also asserted that Christians sharing their faith in the military are “enemies of the Constitution.”

Has he forgotten who put the Constitution together and the very wordage in it? Apparently not.

This is a tearful thing...but I am not surprised...just gut wretched....we knew it could come...but oh golly...to take it away from those who have kept us free....no words are sufficient....


333 posted on 05/01/2013 8:28:33 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

I agree....though very difficult to accept...hurts to see our country invaded and conqured by “heathen” who no longer hide who they are, nor who they serve.

History tells us when ever a nation turns away from God it’s invaded...and not always by military conflict.


334 posted on 05/01/2013 8:32:57 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

No word though if they’re going to court martial homosexuals who recruit straight people into homosexuality though, huh?


335 posted on 05/01/2013 8:33:25 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I got expelled from the "fundamental transformation" indoctrination center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

I do believe there are Christians who choose to ‘Witness” and this ‘not’ with God directing them to do so. ...doing so can have the direct opposite affect they might otherwise hope for.

I have observed the Lord working around them...distracting them or otherwise occuping them... so what work was begun can be carried out as he intends.


336 posted on 05/01/2013 8:37:48 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Isn’t there a 1st Amendment issue here?


337 posted on 05/01/2013 8:41:18 PM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Good, this would work out perfect for us.

Let the Dems expose themselves as extremists. That is how the other side wins elections.
But I am sure Hagel would do anything to stop that.
He is a war hero.

338 posted on 05/01/2013 8:43:39 PM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Bottom line....this nation as a whole turned it’s back on God....He said...Ok, have it your way then. ..and this is what we get.


339 posted on 05/01/2013 8:44:52 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: caww

Yes, indeed. Romans 2 tells us that God gave over those who rejected Him to homosexual practices. He has now given us over, I believe, and His judgment will come. Personally, I believe that He has raised up His modern Pharaoh, the Muslims, to use as a weapon against the pagan nations (US!). He WILL BE GLORIFIED.


340 posted on 05/01/2013 8:58:38 PM PDT by Arkansas Toothpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 461-475 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson