Posted on 04/23/2013 6:39:00 PM PDT by Texas Fossil
Philip Mudd, former counterterror expert for the CIA and the FBI
--
"I would charge these guys as murders not terrorists," Mudd said of the suspects in the attack on the Boston Marathon.
--
"What I fear though is that people too quickly categorize this as terrorism," Mudd added. "This looks more to me like Columbine than it does like Al Qaeda."
--
"Two kids who radicalized between themselves in a closed circle and go out and commit murder," Mudd observed. "I would charge these guys as murderers, not terrorists."
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Heh... we definitely should have seen this coming. As with the Ft. Hood “workplace violence” incident, the most important thing will be to severe the connection between the incident and Islamic terror.
After all, Obama has declared victory in that war. Can’t have a peaceful victory afterglow if the other side is still shooting, can you?
Clearly, everyone that has been mentioned acted in order to gratify their obsession.
Thanks for reminding me about Holmes rigging his apartment with explosives.
Now, suppose police would have entered Holmes’ apartment and the explosives detnanated killings several police officers and a half dozen people who lived in the complex.
Would that make Holmes a terrorist?
I’m trying to follow your logic here and it escapes me.
Are you suggesting that if the 19 year old was tried for terrorism, we’d then have to try the likes of Loughtner as a terrorist?
If any of you had listened to Levin tonight you would have a better understanding of why they ‘couldn’t’ charge this guy with terrorism. Yes, Lindsey Graham et al strike again. It is central to a resolution they passed in 2001. Under the definition of that bill, this guy doesn’t qualify to be charged with terrorism. Sick sick sick!!!
Phillip Mudd turned up in this old article/thread, too:
How the CIA Funds Anti-Bush Propaganda
Frontpagemag.com ^ | September 14, 2004 | Bill Gertz
Posted on Tuesday, September 14, 2004 3:10:20 PM by fuzzy122
How the CIA Funds Anti-Bush Propaganda By Bill Gertz The Washington Times | September 14, 2004
The CIA’s Counterterrorist Center has spent more than $15 million in the past three years funding studies, reports and conferences produced by former Democratic administration officials and other critics of the Bush administration.
The latest effort was a $300,000 grant by the CIA to the Atlantic Council for a study co-authored by Richard A. Clarke, the former counterterrorism official who wrote a best seller accusing the Bush administration of failing in the war on terrorism by invading Iraq.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
It’s the global fascists that have me tied in knots.
We always knew the left was insane and there was no
mystery to those who took the time to learn about the muzzies. It’s those shadowy fascists that I pray get
smacked down.
The Saudis are flying freely in and out of America as from one of four ‘free to fly, no restrictions’ countries, along with Canada, Mexico, and one other I do not immediately recall. The regime has granted favorite status to Saudi Arabia, the funders of world-wide Jihad and the radical madrasses, and the 19 murderous Islime radicals who did 911! Now perhaps Chechens will be granted favored status as well, since they appear to be doing Is Slime’s business.
This marxist freak him self is a terrorist. The only thing he is “expert” in is his own derangement. I bet his parents disowned him...what a self-important life-loser.
“Are you suggesting that if the 19 year old was tried for terrorism, we’d then have to try the likes of Loughtner as a terrorist?”
No, I am suggesting that we should see the Boston Bombers, Loughtner, Adam Lanza, the Ft Hood Shooter and the Columbine killers all in the same light as that should be in the darkest place possible in the American mindset.
As for legally, each, who are still alive, should be executed.
“If they had legitimate incomes from working somewhere, why haven’t we heard about it.”
I bet they were dealing drugs.
"I would have said four years ago that the al-Qaeda movement was emerging as a bigger problem, especially with the emergence of affiliates in places like Yemen and with the spike in homegrown attacks. But I would say today that al-Qaedaism is on the decline. By any balance, the number of places where people want to come after us has declined in the past four years."
It "declined" from a handful of countries to being operationally established in 30.
Obama’s former DHS nominee, Philip Mudd...
Yes, “That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Not Seen.” But would better have been foreseen.
F. Bastiat
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/15962/15962-h/15962-h.htm
(search for: That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Not Seen)
(read 3 profound paragraphs)
Yep, lies 24/7
And the addition of Propaganda, with is worse than lies because it is more believable. It is a thought out scripted Lie.
No. The point is he wasn't planning to go back there, you see. I'm just trying to point out why these acts are different. You're playing rhetorical tiddly winks.
You know, the news just came on with a big banner : TERROR IN BOSTON. Why don't you write them a letter? Tell them it was just a couple of crazies. NBC Chicago.
That's interesting of Mr. Mudd, Obama's pick for the dept of Homland Security...to reject the label of "terrorist" for the Boston Marathon bombers now that he knows who and what they are...when just after the bombing, he was perfectly willing to slap the terrorist label on a home-grown bomber just in hope of taking political advantage.
In an interview, Mudd speculated that the bombing in Boston was more likely the handiwork of homegrown terrorists than of foreigners. “First, the crudeness of the weapons,” he said, enumerating his reasons. “Second, the fact that you don’t have an iconic target. [A foreign terrorist] would typically pick a subway, a building that everybody can recognize…I would say we recognize the Boston Marathon in the United States; I’m not sure they would. I’m trying to understand why someone who had one opportunity would pick an event that a lot of people overseas wouldn’t recognize—unless it’s domestic terrorists, and I think there’s a pretty good prospect of that.” -----http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/17/bin-laden-hunter-philip-mudd-talks-about-boston-at-manhunt-screening.htmlNot to mention the moron thinks a subway would be more famous overseas than the Boston Marathon, which features athletes from around the globe. Was this guy raised in a turnip patch?
“You know, the news just came on with a big banner : TERROR IN BOSTON. Why don’t you write them a letter? Tell them it was just a couple of crazies. NBC Chicago.”
Please show me where I said that the Boston Bombers were not terrorists.
In fact, on this thread and other threads on the topic, I have stated that they are terrorists.
He was cultivated in fecal material watered with Leftist Money. i.e. Soros and company.
Phillip Mudd: As my cousin, Harcourt Fenton Mudd might put it, now listen, Spock, you may be a wonderful science officer but, believe me, you couldn’t sell fake patents to your mother!
Spock: I fail to understand why I should care to induce my mother to purchase falsified patents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.