Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chelsea Clinton Leans In
Parade Magazine ^ | April 7, 2013 | Lynn Sherr

Posted on 04/07/2013 12:46:04 PM PDT by John W

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: John W

My wife was reading me choice excerpts from this puff piece this morning and we fell out of bed laughing.


81 posted on 04/07/2013 7:00:58 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus

I read it where I have read Parade for most of my adult life and it was a very appropriate location today.


82 posted on 04/07/2013 7:04:48 PM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Delta Dawn

:)


83 posted on 04/07/2013 7:38:58 PM PDT by poobear (Socialism in the minds of the elites, is a con-game for the serfs, nothing more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

And, no trouble for Chelsea from the “99%”ers.

Chelsea Clinton to buy $10.5 million apartment on Madison Square Park (In Case You Missed This)
New York Daily News | March 14, 2013 | Phillip Caulfield
Posted on 04/07/2013 12:22:42 PM PDT by IbJensen
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3005149/posts


84 posted on 04/07/2013 7:55:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
She’s running for office. Guaran-g-ddamn-tee it.

Chelsea will have to go into politics.

She has pretty much shown that she is totally worthless and incompetent at everything she has tried.

So there isn't much else she can do and she would fit right in with the rest of the incompetent professional Pols in Washington.


85 posted on 04/07/2013 7:55:25 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Welcome to Obama-Land - EVERYTHING NOT FORBIDDEN IS COMPULSORY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Well Megan McCain has a couple of huge, Ahhhhh, “assets” going for her.


86 posted on 04/07/2013 9:25:27 PM PDT by BBell (And Now for Something Completely Different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BBell

In the cases of Megan McCain and Chelsea Clinton, their combined bust sizes are larger than their combined I.Q.


87 posted on 04/07/2013 10:57:49 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

She’s helping to run one of the Biggest SLUSH FUNDS in history....Clinton Global Initiative!! They don’t even have to STEAL anymore, DOPES GIVE them MONEY!!


88 posted on 04/08/2013 4:06:39 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Alas, a poor substitute for brains. If either Chelsea or Meghan were Conservatives, neither would be given any fawning attention by the media at all (except to deride them).


89 posted on 04/08/2013 9:31:46 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Too bad! Have you seen her in a wet T-shirt?


90 posted on 04/08/2013 10:59:19 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Looks like she had her front teefs ‘unbucked’ as well.


91 posted on 04/08/2013 12:27:28 PM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: John W
Wow, Barf-O-Rama!

Lynn Sherr appears to be HOT! HOT! HOT! for Chelsea Clinton.

92 posted on 04/08/2013 2:55:19 PM PDT by Col Freeper (FR: A smorgasbord of Conservative Mindfood - dig in and enjoy it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

What makes you think I was talking about bust sizes?


93 posted on 04/08/2013 3:54:06 PM PDT by BBell (And Now for Something Completely Different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: BBell

I figured that Chelsea’s bust size was bigger than her I.Q., because Meghan McCain’s certainly is. If you look at the kinds of jobs they’re doing or they’ve done, neither one could be accused of doing rocket science. They’re where they are because of their parent’s names and influence.


94 posted on 04/09/2013 4:12:55 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

Political Dynasties rule, but historically only in the short term in this Country. I think neither of these two will go anywhere. If we could just get rid of the Kennedys...........


95 posted on 04/09/2013 7:44:23 PM PDT by BBell (And Now for Something Completely Different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: BBell
It has always puzzled me why the Kennedys are so loved by Americans. Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr. was a lying philander. He was banging the maid immediately before he was married [the same day]. The boys — Joe Jr., John, and Teddy — were all cut from the same cloth and their kids have been no better. The whole Kennedy dynasty is one huge dysfunctional mess. Yet, the public thinks they are royalty. Go figure!
96 posted on 04/09/2013 8:11:50 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson