Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: massmike

I remember when 17 year old girls were almost always cute, or at least sweet looking.

Slender, youthful, well maintained and groomed, sweet personalities, it sure is strange for an old guy to look at a bunch of teen girls today and not see a cutey in the bunch.

I can see why the young guys today don’t seem very interested in them.


12 posted on 04/02/2013 6:32:42 PM PDT by ansel12 (The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

The fella must be handsome.


13 posted on 04/02/2013 6:36:51 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12
I remember when 17 year old girls were almost always cute, or at least sweet looking.

Not me. In the 60s in Cleveland, a good percentage of the girls (and guys) were called greasers (ref: West Side Story). They looked just as tough as the perp shown here.

16 posted on 04/02/2013 6:38:46 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

I remember too. Turning “Sweet Sixteen” was a milestone, and being seventeen was only a year older, in the sense of not being a child, but not yet being considered a woman. Well, the sexual revolution helped to make all females either sex objects, or sex objects in waiting. Have you seen the clothes in stores for grade school girls, or even younger, these days? A 5 yo “lil hoochie mama”? Talk about “grooming”, like the Muslim gangs did to young British girls, they have nothing on contemporary American culture.


22 posted on 04/02/2013 6:48:23 PM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

If you’ve ever heard of the “manosphere”, they claim that they’re not, at least for nothing more than hit and run. And even then, they say they prefer Eastern European women. They definitely claim to prefer them for anything longer term, including marriage. They pretty much have contempt for American women. Well, we (speaking of American women in general, not every individual one of us) did it to ourselves, with the desire for “Sex In The City” lifestyles, “finding ourselves”, no-fault divorce (app 70% of divorces are initiated by women), man-hating feminism, the “womyn” movement, and on and on. Marriage was always a risk for a man, but now it’s one in which he’s the guaranteed loser if the woman decides to walk, and women have made themselves cheap on the market.


23 posted on 04/02/2013 6:57:49 PM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson