I always thought they replaced him with a look-a-like, the 'Osama' we saw on the video in 2007 wasn't the same man.
Posted on 03/27/2013 6:19:01 AM PDT by Perdogg
I always thought they replaced him with a look-a-like, the 'Osama' we saw on the video in 2007 wasn't the same man.
So, we know that no dna testing was done? We (just plain folks) know that the same types of operators who have been using DNA to identify body parts as enemy actors, after decisive kinetic responses, didn’t take a DNA sample and compare it to anything?
Conspiracies can happen, they can even be kept secret. Likely the only reason for the description of burial at sea with muslim yammerings was to quell any additional backlash from the fanatics (as if they believe a thing coming out of the news).
Whether he croaked at TB or in the raid, the real loss came when zippy ran his suck before any of the intel could be processed and exploited.
RAH also said TANSTAAFL.
YMMV
The whole idea was to remove the concept of ‘bin Laden’ as the focal point of rebel activity. It really didn’t matter whether it was him or a relative. The rebels needed to be forced to look for a new leadership, so they were, and the new leadership is the Muslim Brotherhood.
Which is really nothing other than a consortium of Worldwide Organized Crime.
Do that make him a badass ni****ah?
I am so proud.....not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.