Homosexual acts aren't even "sexual unions" because they don't even "unite the sexes", fer Pete's sake.
As Richard Rodriguez says, the problem is, two gay men just don't have a kosher place to stick it.
British law just discovered that even though gay mariage is legal, two men or two women cannot consummate a marriage, as defined by law.
Neither can they have a marriage annulled because of inability to perform sexual intercourse, because they are not anatomicaly equipped to perform sexual intercourse with each other.
Neither can they be divorced on the ground of adultery if one partner has some kind of sexual jiggery-pokery with another person of the same sex, because whatever they did, it was not adultery as the law defines adultery.
Confused? Yes. Unnatural? Of course. Absurd? Fo' shizzle.
My point, however, is that many heterosexuals do the same. It's all part of the deconstruction of sex, which is a big part of --- in C.S. Lewis' memorable phrase --- "The Abolition of Man".
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
right there on some of their rules they said this way back decades ago and they have nearly done all of those rules and yet our side let them get to this point.
I’ll never accept their sham marriage and I’ve just got a sticker saying marriage =1man and 1 woman and as soon as it;s delivered it;s on my vehicle and to hell with the communist agenda
A wise and noted point. It will be worth noting that when the rest of our countrymen come to their senses and realize this.
That being said what will happen is a new meaningful union will be created in the shadow of the increasingly meaningless old.
The Government will not give back what it has taken, what it has taken will simply turn to shit, along with everything else the state touches.