Posted on 03/21/2013 6:03:36 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
How is it that Sid's "sources" have anything to add the Secretary of State's own sources in these very institutions?
Why is Sid reporting to Hillary as an intelligence gatherer, rather than advising her on her political situation -- which is his area of expertise?
Why is there nothing sensitive or previously unknown (or imponderable) in these communications? Nothing that "clears" Hillary or "implicates" another party?
More really excellent questions. Especially the first one.
Tor is NOT illegal in the U.S.
https://www.eff.org/torchallenge/legal-faq/
Then I was misinformed. Thanks
I found it in a search, after finding a reference to it here:
The related FR thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3429226/posts
There was a lot of skepticism two years ago. Things have changed somewhat. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.