Once again sanity has been outnumbered and one of the worst liberal agendas ever continues on.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-22 last
To: Responsibility2nd
Under this law, conceivably not being “friendly enough” with litigious women or gay men could be construed as prejudicial speech intended to cause emotional distress, simply by retaining the right to say “no”.
51 posted on
02/28/2013 3:53:33 PM PST by
fattigermaster
(Train for life in prison because they are stacking the bricks and setting the bars around you.)
To: Responsibility2nd
The VAWA clearly violates the Equal Protection Act, which guarantees equal protection for all, including men. I'm looking forward to seeing men unite with MRAs and fight these laws until...
Oh, who am I kidding.
52 posted on
02/28/2013 3:53:51 PM PST by
TwelveOfTwenty
(Ho, ho, hey, hey, I'm BUYcotting Chick-Fil-A)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-22 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson