Tactical showers built with slats for sides and open areas upper and lower -- so you can see around you when showering. . .in the field, in combat, never let your guard down.
Females complained that the men watched them shower. . .so. . .females got their own shower built, complete with full walls so no one can see then. . .and they couldn't see outside either. Tactically unsound and dangerous, but hey. . at least they had privacy.
Field latrines, half-50-gal drum with waist-high sides around the “toilets.” Must have half-walls because in a combat environment must be able to see around you even when sitting dow doing your business. . you are vulnerable. . .can't let your guard down. . . .unless you are a female.
Females complained and they had their own $h^^ers built, completely enclosed, of course, so the men couldn't watch them.
So, men had no privacy but women were afforded all the privacy they wanted. . .regardless of the tactical requirement to be alert, aware and able to respond,
No sir, standards and privacy will not be compromised, no sir (sarc/)
“Weak Link” book by Brian Mitchell is an excellent read to discover just how much combat standards have been lowered already. . .
101st, Gulf War I: HHC. Several females.
Tactical showers built with slats for sides and open areas upper and lower — so you can see around you when showering. . .in the field, in combat, never let your guard down.
Females complained that the men watched them shower. . .so. . .females got their own shower built, complete with full walls so no one can see then. . .and they couldn’t see outside either. Tactically unsound and dangerous, but hey. . at least they had privacy.
Field latrines, half-50-gal drum with waist-high sides around the toilets. Must have half-walls because in a combat environment must be able to see around you even when sitting dow doing your business. . you are vulnerable. . .can’t let your guard down. . . .unless you are a female.
Females complained and they had their own $h^^ers built, completely enclosed, of course, so the men couldn’t watch them.
So, men had no privacy but women were afforded all the privacy they wanted. . .regardless of the tactical requirement to be alert, aware and able to respond,
Which throws the whole “equal rights” argument out the window. They wanted SPECIAL RIGHTS above the rights of men.