Posted on 01/18/2013 7:47:00 AM PST by Veggie Todd
The US Transport and Security Administration (TSA) will remove all 174 of OSI Systems Inc. (OSIS)’s Rapiscan body scanners from airports, following serious concerns over their inability to protect the privacy of passengers.
(Excerpt) Read more at rt.com ...
Yes, but - replace them with what?
Body cavity search with Uncle Friendly wearing latex gloves. They promise not to take pictures and the public is expected to view the new procedure as less intrusive on their privacy.
Until this last year, I used to fly a LOT. I can say I NEVER stepped into one of those but I was frisked a lot. I would like to think that there were enough people like me that caused this action.
People need to do the same at “sobriety checkpoints” and refuse to answer ANY questions, no matter how innaucuous. Your time has value. The state disrespects your time and you when they stop you on a fishing expedition to see if you are doing something wrong. I refuse to stand for it.
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing”
YES!!
Cavity searches.
I would love to see a class action lawsuit against the TRA on behalf of all travelers that passed thru those scanners over the years!
The TSA is going to get rid of the naked scanners. That’s great.
My question, though, is... when are we going to get rid of the TSA?
TSA,,not TRA. A class action suit against the TSA since there were warnings from the beginning these things may not be safe.
Yeah, I used to have a lot of company when I opted out, now I usually just stand alone: people have been conditioned!
The Congressmen who invested in this company
already made their profit.
Time to have TSA but their next companies’ products.
I think the EU had determined they presented an unsafe radiation risk and removed them. Only a matter of time until that got admitted by some trial judge over here.
{this lamppost reserved for Michael Chertoff}
You forgot a word. Has anyone ever seen them routinely change gloves between passengers?
Yes: A lot of people got rich off this boondoggle.
What will they do with these machines now ?
Money down the tubes. Like so many Obama projects.
But will I get my scan back? I'm scheduled for a MRI and could maybe save money and tine by using the airport scan./sarc
people have been conditioned!
I'd bet their gloves are crawling with microbes. They should do one of those testings they love to do on hotel rooms etc.. Where they would take a TSA glove and run it under a microscope.
Flew=Flu
With the other company they are already using that makes a cartoon figure instead of a direct copy of your physical outline.
The machines are NOT going away, but the nudie pictures are going away.
From the article:
The TSA has been using two companies to conduct the searches, outsourcing to both Rapiscan and L-3 Communications Holdings to produce the machines. While the Rapiscan machines have been utilizing weak X-rays to create what appears to be a naked image of the subject, the machines of L-3 Communications Holdings use radio waves to depict concealed objects on an avatar image on a screen, and will continue to be used by the TSA.
If union, maybe TSA'ers rebelled that they were being radiated throughout their shifts.
Not to mention, the passengers being loud at the TSA checkpoint.
Being radiated and having to listen to aggravated pilots, passengers, catering staff and stewards, etc.
What's not to love about body scanners?!
They’re not getting rid of all scanners. Just the ones that are the radiation risk. They’re keeping the other ones and replacing the xray machines.
>> Body cavity search with Uncle Friendly wearing latex gloves.
By the way, those gloves are to protect HIM, not you. They may not be clean. Demand that he change them right before he “does” you.
Every time I fly, which is only about 4 times a year, I get pulled out of line for the full body scanner. This year in Sydney I was pulled out of line to be checked for explosives. The security guy had me read a document and asked me if I agreed to be checked. Of course the alternative was that you would not be allowed on the plane. Some choice.
To protect the TSA worker and spread G knows what to you!
This is article is from a Russian newspaper. Why is it we hear about this in foreign papers and not ours?
Silly me. If it was about the Kardashians or Lance Armstrong this would be front page news.
That caught my eye too. I’m not familiar with this source. Can we trust it as valid? Even if the press were avoiding this, Fox News would be all over it. Until I see it there or over national news, I’m hesitant that the next time I fly these will be gone.
From AP...brief article, only mentions privacy concerns not safety. Seems congress had issues also with the machines
I used to fly about 25 times a year. I guess I'll have to wait until June until those things are gone for good. I'd like to think we played a very small role in creating the Congressional mandate to get rid of them.
“...Silly me. If it was about the Kardashians or Lance Armstrong this would be front page news.”
Or the what’s his name ball player with the alleged fake girlfriend...
Welcome to Obamacare.
I’d like to think we played a very small role
… This is the outfit that Chertoff is associated with. But the makers of the L-3 scanners that now have a monopoly have Tom Daschle's wife as a key lobbyist for them. They're all crooks and carpetbaggers. It's more likey that this decision is about money and politics than protecting anyone
Obama’s cronies made a fortune selling those scanners to the TSA.
Now that they’ve made the money on those sales, might as well junk the things and move on to something else—which Obama will order the TSA to buy from his cronies.
I directed the operational testing of these systems for a DoD agency for deploying them into operational theaters (the safety testing was done elsewhere). We concluded that the Rapidscan was deficient in several respects and we did this with full knowledge and experience with other backscatter X-ray systems that we employed for other purposes. In the end, we selected the L3 system. I have spent many hours in front of the displays of both systems and found the L3 device better at identifying threats and was less intrusive from a body display perspective.
Over at the TSA, it's useful to know that Chertoff has a business relationship with Rapidscan and that the TSA testing (done by someone I know) came to conclusions similar to mine, but were overruled at higher levels in TSA.
Does L-3 offer reduced/eliminated skin cancer risk from uncalibrated back-scatter machines?
Short answer is yes. Backscatter is X-Ray and some in the medical field claim that any X-Ray energy represents risk, even though we all get X-Rays at the doctors’ and the dentist. This just adds to that mix.
L3 system operates in a different band on the spectrum and I haven’t heard any of the smart guys say that they had any safety concerns. I am not an expert, but the experts that I have talked to haven’t expressed concerns.
I travel frequently and have metal knees. I avoid the magnetometer whenever I can and pick the L3 whenever I can. I do go through the Rapidscan when I have to. (KC only has Rapidscan, so I use that outbound. Most return trips I can use a L3 machine.
The Rapidscan machine is the flat panel that you turn and face. The L3 machine is the one where you stand in a cylinder and the scanner revolves around you.
Thanks.
HA!
"Or the what’s his name ball player with the alleged fake girlfriend...
Don't forget the wonderful awards Hollywood gave themselves last Monday./sarc
> The Congressmen who invested in this company
already made their profit.
Time to have TSA but their next companies’ products.
You hit the nail square on the head. It was never about safety; it was about selling those scanning booths and atuffing the pockets of politican. Wonder how much they made off with?
> The Congressmen who invested in this company
already made their profit.
Time to have TSA but their next companies’ products.
You hit the nail square on the head. It was never about safety; it was about selling those scanning booths and stuffing the pockets of politican. Wonder how much they made off with?
Bush's cronies. It's important to be precise, as the statists wear the costumes of either faction as it suits their purposes.
I'd go with a hand held scan if it was safe, and not look askance at carry on being scanned.
But, what about photo film and laptops? Can they go through any scan without crumbling?
What if they go into baggage; are film and laptops scanned?
If I get a notice from my dentist that I just had teeth cleaned and that my X-Ray showed nothing irregular, think I could be excused...
The hand held is a magnatometer, it’s good at detecting metallic objects like guns and knee replacements. Not so good a catching plastic explosives and other things that bring airplanes out of the sky and turn people into little bitty pieces.
For my purposes (discovering followers of the religion of peace who were trying to blow soldiers to smithereens), I found the L3 devices to be the best thing out there.
HA, you're here now,right?/sarc
Actually, how DID you get out of Sydney? You did get out, right?
HA!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.