Posted on 01/15/2013 3:50:57 PM PST by Dead Dog
See link
(Excerpt) Read more at salon.com ...
These are the kids that ran from the 2nd classroom where the 2nd teacher and I think four kids were killed. The teacher put some in the closet and others in cupboards and when the shooter came in she lied and said the kids were at some other activity.
He shot her and most of the kids hidden in cupboards bolted. 4 killed, 6 escaped BEFORE any response arrived. They ran like rabbits and ended up in this guys driveway.
He did those kids a solid, taking them in, making cocoa, calling their parents and generally giving them as much normalcy as possible.
If you watch his “performances” he identifies the person with the children as a man in several of them and as a woman in several others. I find this EXTREMELY odd.
I can understand getting details confused. Almost anyone who’s told a story multiple times will embellish it - like the classic fish story where the fish gets bigger with each retelling - but to change a man to a woman or vice versa? Really makes me wonder if such a person existed.
Yes, this is part of the narrative that involves “I think” and other suppositions. The mortar of this narrative began to crumble at many places in the first week after the event and since that time, much patching of the story has taken place.
And the explanations are always...sensible.
But why so much defense of this narrative on FR in face of FReepers expressing desire for much more information, not just persuasion. See what I’m saying? A newsjockey doing a stand-up report in front of a location does not constitute evidence of anything other than he/she has a job.
>> I’m assuming these were those children.
> Your presumption should be easy to prove. But it isn’t delineated that well in the present and continuing narrative. The point is...we don’t know.
The point is to not harass a private citizen until you KNOW he’s lying.
Even if he is lying, what’s the deal with all the death threats? It’s crazy, egregiously horrible if the guy is innocent, and it makes those of us with genuine concerns for 2nd amendment rights look like idiotic, paranoid monsters.
For those who can’t stand Salon (and I don’t blame you) here’s the story on Yahoo.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/gene-rosen-sandy-hook-conspiracy-155033813.html
1. No one on FR is advocating harrassing this man or anyone. It’s a bad, bad idea to do so.
2. I mentioned the headline in Salon but said nothing about my feelings regarding that website.
I didn't post a video, I wrote that the search would reveal questionable antics.
Says who, you, you're the arbiter of what is is a cover up or what is a conspiracy?
obama is a marxist plant, communism is taking over this Country, I guess that's a conspiracy too eh?
Never mind, you support it.
Here is a interview with a mother who was there on the scene that day and saw the kids running down to Gene Rosen’s house which is by the firehouse:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptbd6qRY358
I did and they are not crisis actors and not the same people. And they are also not the parents of the Green girl in the Tucson shooting which the same videomakers allege.
These videomakers are playing you for a fool.
Especially things that are impossible for the average person to contemplate or comprehend. These are the things they delight in.
Nick Phelps is as bald as a cue ball. In the interview that this picture comes from he takes off his hat. Richard Sexton still has hair. They are not the same people. Nor are their wives and children.
>>Yep, some are on this site.
I caught some crap from several for trying to settle down a bunch of Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist nonsense around the weaponry used.
I'd rather not.
If you can't bother to provide one or two sentences describing the subject, I can't be bothered to go to the "illiterates'" link.
There's a link to an interview with an eyewitness mother who can @Post #49.
These were the kids who were in the cabinets in Victoria Soto's classroom who ran from the school when there was a lull in the shooting. To get out of their classroom they had step over the dead bodies of Soto and their classmates. When they got outside they just wanted to run as fast and as far as their little feet could carry them -- and I don't blame them. Do you???
Where did you hear that??? That is nowhere near the truth.
So how did the kids get out?
Lockdown means that no one can enter. It didn't mean that the kids could not get out. Anyway the glass beside the front door had been blown out which is how the perp entered and the police.
they would find is the fire station - where emergency responders were mustering. How did they end up past the fire station in a private home driveway?
These kids escaped the school and ran past the fire station before anyone was mustering at the fire station.
Listen to the interview at Post #49.
Yep — listen to the interview at the link at post #49.
Here’s an interview with a mother who came upon the scene and saw the kids running down to the firehouse. These were the same kids that escaped from Soto’s classroom and wound up sitting on this guy’s lawn that morning.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptbd6qRY358
No, this is part of the account
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.