Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Montanans will not obey any new federal gun restrictions
HungaryHorseNews ^ | Sunday, January 6, 2013 10:35 am | Gary Marbut

Posted on 01/08/2013 10:45:12 AM PST by Red Steel

Editor’s note: The following was sent to Montana’s congressional delegation on behalf of the Montana Shooting Sports Association.

Because there is much discussion among gun owners of Montana about proposals by Sen. Diane Feinstein and others for Congress to enact various types of gun control, I though you would appreciate knowing what I hear from Montanans about this.

I speak to you as a person intimately familiar with firearms, with public policy about firearms, as a person accepted in state and federal courts as an expert on firearms, firearms safety and use of force, and as the president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, Montana’s primary organization asserting the right to keep and bear arms, also affiliated or associated with the National Rifle Association, Gun Owners of America, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and the Second Amendment Foundation.

On behalf of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, I wish to express our unequivocal opposition to any ban on any class or type of firearms, any new registration requirements on any class or types of firearms, any restrictions on manufacture, sale or possession of ammunition feeding devices of any configuration or capacity, and any government intrusion into firearm transfers between private citizens. Any congressional actions in any of these areas would be an infringement upon the rights the citizens of Montana have reserved to themselves.

The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article II, Section 12 of the Montana Constitution — these sections of these foundational documents are not government permission to keep firearms. They are statements whereby the people have reserved these rights to themselves specifically from government interference.

These statements do not create any rights, but simply recognize preexisting “natural rights” which are restricted from government interference. As you consider whatever “gun control” (actually people control) may be offered by Sen. Feinstein or others, I hope you will keep these facts clearly in mind.

“Gun-free zones” are a terrible failure of public policy. Virtually all mass shootings, including the one in Connecticut that has sparked the current wave of media hysteria, happen in places where public policy has incorrectly assured people that they are safe, but where the policy has actually created risk-free zones for madmen, and pools of defenseless victims conveniently offered up for slaughter by failed policy.

Former police officer Ron Avery says, “The only way to check violence in progress, where the victim can neither hide nor flee, is by equal or greater force in a timely manner.“ If Congress feels compelled to “do something” in the wake of the Connecticut shooting, it should repeal the pretense of all federally-mandated or federally-inspired “gun-free zones.”

For any inside the Beltway who actually believe in the effectiveness of “gun-free zones,” I recommend that the White House, the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House, the U.S. Supreme Court and all federal courthouses be declared “gun-free zones,” and that all armed guards and protective personnel in those places be removed. If “gun-free zones” are effective for our kids, they’re good enough for our servants.

Various gun bans, licensing or registration schemes, and/or bans or restrictions of ammunition feeding devices will fail. I won’t bother you with discussion of the fact that any such restrictions will have no effect on criminals or madmen. I believe you already know that.

I do hope to inform you about how strongly the gun owners of Montana feel about their right to keep and bear arms. I have asked around among a considerable number of friends, acquaintances and contacts in Montana. I have not learned of anyone who would comply, for example, with a new federal law requiring them to register or surrender their semi-auto rifles to authorities.

Let me be very clear: Montanans will not comply with any new federal restrictions. The most any such restrictions would do would be to create a huge, new, armed, outlaw class of citizens. And I very much doubt that most Montana law enforcement personnel would cooperate in enforcing any such federal restrictions.

Clearly, the vast numbers of citizens who have bought new firearms in the past month, especially the hundreds of thousands of expensive semi-auto rifles, did not buy these new firearms simply so they’d have them available to surrender if Congress should pass a law demanding they do so.

Since Montana law enforcement personnel are unlikely to enforce any such restrictions, the effect of passage of such restrictions would ultimately be for federal officers to come to Montana to enforce them. Because most Montanans will simply not comply with any new federal restraints on a right they have reserved specifically from government interference, the obvious result would be armed conflict between Montanans and federal enforcers. (I offer this not as a threat or a challenge, but simply as an observation.)

I certainly hope you would not set Montana on the path to an armed conflict with federal enforcers by aiding or supporting passage of any new federal restrictions. That would not be in the best interest of your constituents.

Instead, if you feel compelled to pass some actually corrective legislation in response to the media hysteria over the Connecticut shooting, I highly recommend that you get rid of those dangerous and illusory “gun free zones.”

Gary Marbut, of Missoula, is the president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: banglist; donttreadonme; guncontrol; liberty; molonlabe; nocompromise; secondamendment; tyranny; waronliberty; wewillnotcomply; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

1 posted on 01/08/2013 10:45:17 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
They will.

One way or another...

2 posted on 01/08/2013 10:48:14 AM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Because newspapers are publishing maps of gun owners in NY, we thought it only fair to do the same in Texas. Attached is a map of Texas gun owners.

Each Orange Dot Is a Gun Owner


3 posted on 01/08/2013 10:51:20 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Then the US government would have went into coo coo bird land. If Wacos happen, anti-government guerrilla warfare cells would form all over the US.


4 posted on 01/08/2013 10:56:51 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void
That all depends on how many come to the party and how many are left afterwards.
5 posted on 01/08/2013 10:57:32 AM PST by Joe Brower (The "American People" are no longer capable of self-governance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Clearly, the vast numbers of citizens who have bought new firearms in the past month, especially the hundreds of thousands of expensive semi-auto rifles, did not buy these new firearms simply so they’d have them available to surrender if Congress should pass a law demanding they do so.

The money quote. Advice to gun-grabbing politicians: think and live.

6 posted on 01/08/2013 10:59:31 AM PST by Noumenon (One individual with courage, determination and a rifle can change the course of history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

They only got away with this once.


7 posted on 01/08/2013 11:06:25 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Then the US government would have went into coo coo bird land. If Wacos happen, anti-government guerrilla warfare cells would form all over the US.

That's the general idea.

Eliminate the US as a effective presence the world stage, provide a free hand for the establishment of ummah.

Ever wonder why we aren't mentioned in Revelation?

8 posted on 01/08/2013 11:09:47 AM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

what’s never said is, that even without the 2nd amendment, no where does the Constitution allow the federal government to do anything about guns - no registering, no background checks, no permits. Nothing.


9 posted on 01/08/2013 11:10:22 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Ruby Ridge?

Hundreds of anonymous SWAT raids?

Perhaps “once” has a different definition in your dictionary.


10 posted on 01/08/2013 11:12:04 AM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wny

Yet they do.


11 posted on 01/08/2013 11:12:51 AM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The government may attack a few fringe groups without serious problems. But trying to take the guns of the population at large has been tried before. It started the most important war in US history.

http://www.davekopel.org/2A/LawRev/american-revolution-against-british-gun-control.html


12 posted on 01/08/2013 11:12:51 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Someone mentioned on another thread that at their height of "power" the IRA had only about 300 soldiers.

Smaller country, but still - if America can marshall a few million out of the 80 million gun owners....

13 posted on 01/08/2013 11:13:51 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I don’t think the Maoists have the balls to really try by making their idiotic and megalmaniac fantasies come true...but we will see.


14 posted on 01/08/2013 11:14:53 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Test....


15 posted on 01/08/2013 11:16:26 AM PST by TNanchor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I know about RR quite well. The FBI’s Sniper Lon Noriuchi murdered his wife and child. It was entrapment and murder, but not on the wholesale scale of Waco where the government murdered dozens of women and children and used US troops to do it. All the rest were SWAT, ATF and FBI.

The picture is what I was remarking on. It won’t happen again without a rebellion or repercussions.


16 posted on 01/08/2013 11:16:41 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thackney
It working pretty well in Great Britain, and it was a rip-roaring success in Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, Commie China and Khmer Rouge Cambodia.

Are Americans a different species than the people in those countries? Do we really have some magical genetic protection from it ever happening here?

17 posted on 01/08/2013 11:18:08 AM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Yes, it’s called individualism. You won’t find that prevalent around the world except in the US.


18 posted on 01/08/2013 11:24:30 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: null and void

saw a show on that this morning early. They showed the video of all the ATF agents during the gun battle and after the cease fire was declared.

Certainly not America’s finest moment.


19 posted on 01/08/2013 11:25:22 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
I don’t think the Maoists have the balls to really try by making their idiotic and megalmaniac fantasies come true...but we will see.

We need to make sure they never, ever, ever have confidence that they can indeed pull it off.

The instant they believe they can get away with it, without any personal loss, they will try it.

So what if a few hundred, or a few thousand LEOs or Military are sacrificed on the alter of the greater good?

20 posted on 01/08/2013 11:25:38 AM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I believe we are now on the same page.


21 posted on 01/08/2013 11:27:14 AM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Before congress rushes to ‘never let a crisis go to waste’, they need to understand that every county has a sheriff and sheriffs are sworn to defend the constitution and protect their citizens from the feds if it comes to that.


22 posted on 01/08/2013 11:28:35 AM PST by Baynative (Those that work for a living are now outnumbered by those that vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I’m not going to get into a lot of your “what ifs” here... But the answers to your questions are easy to answer.


23 posted on 01/08/2013 11:30:28 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Neither will freepers


24 posted on 01/08/2013 11:30:36 AM PST by Mom MD (Liberals are slinkies. Good for nothing but they make you smile when you push them down stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

This says it all.

In 1929 , the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953 ,
about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded
up and exterminated.


In 1911 , Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million
Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.


Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total
of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were
rounded up and exterminated.


China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million
political dissidents, unable to defend themselves , were rounded up and
exterminated.


Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, one hundred

thousand Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves , were rounded up and
exterminated.


Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, three hundred

thousand Christians , unable to defend themselves , were rounded up and
exterminated.


Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977 ,one million
educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.


Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century
because of gun control: 56 million.



25 posted on 01/08/2013 11:30:54 AM PST by kenmcg (scapegoat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Yes we are different. For example we have an all volunteer military. Not mandatory service, not conscription not required for culture advancement, etc.


26 posted on 01/08/2013 11:30:54 AM PST by Mechanicos (When did we amend the Constitution for a 2nd Federal Prohibition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Yes, it’s called individualism. You won’t find that prevalent around the world except in the US.

Do you know many individualists under 30? Are they a majority? A plurality? A minority? Or are they an anomaly?

27 posted on 01/08/2013 11:31:45 AM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mechanicos

They may yet save us.


28 posted on 01/08/2013 11:34:45 AM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Ping


29 posted on 01/08/2013 11:37:36 AM PST by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

You won’t see me nully, but I’ll wave to you from a distance when you’re being ushered to a FEMA camp while you’re also waiting for the coming Revelation. You know most of this is nonsense talk.


30 posted on 01/08/2013 11:40:10 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I don’t think I’ll be allowed to live long enough to see the inside of a FEMA camp.

I’m also an agnostic, for whatever that’s worth.

All dressed up, destination unknown...


31 posted on 01/08/2013 11:45:42 AM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wny
what’s never said is, that even without the 2nd amendment, no where does the Constitution allow the federal government to do anything about guns - no registering, no background checks, no permits. Nothing.

The author does touch the subject of every human being's 'natural right' to self-defense and the extension of this natural right.

Article - "These statements do not create any rights, but simply recognize preexisting “natural rights” "

32 posted on 01/08/2013 11:52:21 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Ever wonder why we aren't mentioned in Revelation?

If you mean "we" as in "you and I" then oh oh it is because we was smart enough to get out (all the way out) when the getting was GOOD!

33 posted on 01/08/2013 11:56:34 AM PST by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I won’t comply either. I reserve the authority to defend and protect my life and those I love from any aggression or aggressor who means to intimdate me into complying with their demand or whoever intends on injuring or killing anyone.

I will not be disarmed and made venerable, that is “defenseless”.

It is my right and moral obligation, God given, to save myself, those I love and anyone near me from death.

I will use any means to overcome and overpower anyone or beast who would attempt to kill or maim.

You may have my guns after I run out of ammunition but, that ammunition will be sent downrange in your direction with accurate fire.

I have never nor do I have any thoughts of being a 1st aggressor and never harmed a man or thing who did not strike me first.

I abhor violence but, the only way prevent violence is the knowledge of all men that their first strike will be met with an even greater force to end their actions and that may very well result in great bodily injury to them or their death.

All men know this. The rational ones.

For the KuhRayZee and Demented, as well those who are evil, conscience has left them long ago as to what is right and what is wrong. For they will act on the stories they tell themselves and they are not to be trusted nor will they be allowed to prevail. The outcome for them is predictable. They will be ended or subdued and circumstances will dictate whatever the result is.

Leave me alone.


34 posted on 01/08/2013 12:08:18 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
It working pretty well in Great Britain...Are Americans a different species than the people in those countries?

Well, we threw out the government those citizens chose to keep, so yes on GB.

Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia...

Those two governments don't exist anymore.

Commie China and Khmer Rouge Cambodia

Not much freedom for gun owners or anybody else in those two countries. We don't tolerate the other repressions routinely done in those countries, I don't know why anyone should expect we will roll over on the gun issues.

Do we really have some magical genetic protection from it ever happening here?

No we don't. And previous stands against tyranny doesn't provide magic protection today. That is why we have to be prepared to refresh the Tree of Liberty any time it is needed. We just need to provide it with some tyrants along with the patriots.

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”
- Ronald Reagan

35 posted on 01/08/2013 12:09:33 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred
By "we" I mean these United States of America.

Either the Book of Revelation is wrong, and even as an agnostic that bothers me*, or we are rendered irrelevant in the Final Battle.

That bothers me too.

*Yes, I know that makes absolutely no sense. It is what it is...

36 posted on 01/08/2013 12:10:47 PM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Most of us hard working folks cannot afford the time off work and the cost of the fight, but I have longed for someone with the means and temperament to be arrested for open carry and take it all the way to SCOTUS. No where in the 2nd does it say anything about concealed permits and other such nonsense and restrictions, but we have tolerated it in fear of the fight to SCOTUS not turning out our way. Actually now and with the next SCOTUS appointment that fear rings true.

Just like when Wyatt Earp and others posted their towns as no-gun zones, that was against the law but some people think he was justified.


37 posted on 01/08/2013 12:14:49 PM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; null and void

Nully won’t be going anywhere. I’ll be at his side sending .308 downrange.


38 posted on 01/08/2013 12:17:12 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Those two governments don't exist anymore.

Neither will ours, at least in any recognizable form, if they go down that bloody road.

No we don't. And previous stands against tyranny doesn't provide magic protection today.

That is exactly my point.

39 posted on 01/08/2013 12:20:24 PM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Perhaps you should modify your first line in post #2 so that it reads: “they will try...”


40 posted on 01/08/2013 12:25:15 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Hopefully, we can avoid that by not being home when they come knocking...


41 posted on 01/08/2013 12:31:07 PM PST by Dead Corpse (Sine ullo desiderio vive et ama.... Carpe diem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney
But I don't think Montanans will try to comply. Quite the opposite.

I do fear that they will comply, one way or another, even if it requires that every mother's son of them be buried without their guns.

And we have just the man eager to accept Edgar's terms (MIB) in the white house right now.

I suppose I could have said "The Montanans will try not to." but then "One way or another..." wouldn't fit.

42 posted on 01/08/2013 12:40:30 PM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“Beast out of the Earth or Beast out of the sea” I bet we are, but not in a way American Christians would hope that we would be...

The Beast system may have a power base, and broke though we are only invites a charismatic madman who takes control of our nukes, our military, and our air and space flight prowess....don’t think we couldn’t put things back together in the name of the “father land” under certain Nazi like conditions. Canada and Mexico could be easily annexed.

We could have a financial collapse, but that would just mean a military dictatorship arises that ignores our past national debt. We would be a wounded nation, but with nukes and what ever else they have never begun to tell us about. We still have vast supplies of oil, coal, and even rare earths that could be mined again once the “old order” including troublesome enviro’s and Religious fanatics(many of which had suddenly vanished from the scene) were kicked out of the way.

Now what sort of Charismatic Satanically empowered Beast System wouldn’t take advantage of all that to begin to assert its will upon the Earth....”Who is like unto the Beast and who is able to make war against it?” The US disappears or worse becomes the heart of a dark empire...perhaps even a few decades before the Beast and the final end of days scenario is played out!


43 posted on 01/08/2013 12:45:01 PM PST by mdmathis6 ("Barry" Xmas to all and have a rapaciously taxable New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: null and void

We are in the Book of Revelations, imho. We are Israel.


44 posted on 01/08/2013 12:46:53 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.

I thought you meant the government, hence I was thinking "they will try".

even if it requires that every mother's son of them be buried without their guns.

I suspect the government will run out of ammo before the people do.

45 posted on 01/08/2013 12:47:27 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
It won’t happen again without a rebellion or repercussions.

Tim McVeigh is a murderous a**h*le who gave us a national tragedy including the re-election of Bill Clinton. But he did plant this seed in the mind of every federal storm trooper who is inclined to these type of excesses.

46 posted on 01/08/2013 12:50:38 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

got away? not exactly. Remember there was that whole disagreement thing that McVeigh had with the Fedz so he made a major “point” in Okie City. I’m pretty sure most Fedz realize they would be surrounded if another clusterflock like Waco develops


47 posted on 01/08/2013 12:51:36 PM PST by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

“...every county has a sheriff and sheriffs are sworn to defend the constitution and protect their citizens from the feds if it comes to that.”

I live in a fairly rural coastal area of Maine. Most people in Maine are armed to the teeth. The majority of them are pro-second amendment.

In late December, Donnie Smith, the sheriff of Washington County, Maine, called for an “assault weapons” ban. This “sheriff” said that people aren’t allowed to own SCUD missiles or nuclear weapons, so they shouldn’t be allowed to own “assault weapons.” What?! He’s equating semi-automatic rifles with nuclear weapons?

Fortunately, I don’t live in Washington County, Maine, a rural coastal county in “downeast” Maine, in the northeast corner of the state. It is a poor county, but like all of rural Maine, people are well-armed.

Meanwhile, these tiny police and sheriff departments around the nation have FULLY automatic weapons, armored personnel carriers, drones and aggressive SWAT teams who, in numerous cases, serve warrants for minor offenses. The feds are giving THEM all sorts of military equipment. Yet, they want to strip US of our constitutional rights.

A sheriff I greatly admire is Sheriff Paul Babeu of Pinal County, Arizona, halfway between Phoenix and Tucson. I’ve heard him on talk radio and he is very conservative and pro-second amendment. Great guy.


48 posted on 01/08/2013 1:00:17 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (November 6, 2012.....A day that will live in infamy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: null and void

different species? genetic protection? Nope——just armed to the teeth and not really interested in being a marxist’s subject. For my own part I’ve never started a fight but have indeed finished a few. Not a good career move for a dumbass, public or private.


49 posted on 01/08/2013 1:00:28 PM PST by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ez; mdmathis6
We are in the Book of Revelations, imho. We are Israel.

I can't make that interpretation work in my mind.

mdmathis6's interpretation better fits the current trajectory and human nature.

50 posted on 01/08/2013 1:12:19 PM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson