Skip to comments.Conspiracy theory professor says Sandy Hook shooting may not have happened
Posted on 01/08/2013 9:51:11 AM PST by Nachum
Outrageous claims made by a professor who specializes in conspiracy theories are set to provoke grieving family by saying that the Sandy Hook massacre may not have happened at all.
James Tracy, a tenured history professor at Florida Atlantic University, wrote a lengthy post on his personal blog saying that the shooting that left 20 children and six teachers dead may not have happened the way that it is widely believed, if it happened at all.
Backed solely by the erroneous early reports filed during the midst of the horrendous incident, Mr Tracy 's claim is preying on the confusion of the tragic day.
'While it sounds like an outrageous claim, one is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place -- at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation's news media have described,' he has said.
The 47-year-old professor bases his outrageous claims largely on the flurry of conflicting media reports that were made as news of the shooting was released throughout the day on December 14.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Consider the source
Thanks. Considering no one talked about it until after the shooting occurred, I consider the reputation of the source as deserved.
Makes perfect sense to me. United Way planned the attacks.
Or, possibly, somebody fiddled with the image.
Or, there was a glitch that caused the date to come up inaccurately.
Which of the three would Occam’s Razor say is least likely?
Oh, I know, they are all alive, but have been confined to special camps to train as Obama’s special militia.
Or maybe they were all taken away and replaced with shot up mannequins.
The dry cleaner must have shrunk your tin foil hat. You need a new one. This hat is cutting off circulation to your brain.
Here we go, the nutty living in denial folks at it.
Consider the source, consider that it isn't welcome on FR.
Consider the implications if it is accurate...
Of course, the most logical and most likely answer is that United Way, from their HQ down to this local office in Connecticut, is engaged in a massive conspiracy, probably took part in the "shootings" themselves, and it probably all has to do with The War on Christmas(tm). Or something like that. I'm still working on that part.
Is it not the only explanation at this point?!?!
(Really, this was exactly the type of kookery I referenced in my first post).
I disagree with you.
Did you miss the point that the Joint Chiefs signed off on Operation Northwoods.
It wasn’t too crazy for the JOINT CHIEFS.
Do you know why the public knows about MK Ultra?
It’s because Richard Helms didn’t get all of the documents destroyed.
Back then, people like you would have said “Oh, it’s just those conspiracy nuts again”
You don’t know if there has ever been an offshoot to Operation Northwoods...just like you almost didn’t know about MK Ultra.
Btw, here is a KEY point.
Kennedy didn’t say the plan was too crazy.
He said he was not contemplating military force at the time according to Lansdale’s memo.
I am not one of those that believe Bush was behind 9/11
HOWEVER, I am one of those that fully believe that our government is capable of just about anything.
Have you ever watched the show Spooks ? Called MI5 in the US. I watched it on Netflix.
It is pretty negative about the US..but also government officials in general.
Maybe it is all over the top.
BUT..I don’t doubt some of it happens to some extent.
I wonder what the significance, if any, of the term "Sandy" is. My gut tells me it's some sort of marketing slogan for something.
Also, the Arizona, Colorado and Connecticut shooters all share a MK Ultra profile. Were they MK Ultra? I wish that I could dismiss the notion out of hand, but there's too much there to ignore.
I suppose you also believe Arlen Specters Magic Bullet Theory?
One of the main victims of that shooting didn’t even believe it!
One of the greatest conspiracy theories of all time - launched by Arlen Specter.
The whole Sandy Hook story is “The Fog of Propaganda.”
Your presence on this thread clinches it for me.
If you mock it, it has to be solid enough to cover up.
The teacher said she was asked to close her eyes, as they led her out. Very odd interviews. Including the fact this was discussed.
If you go to my dead pool file, I have one paragraph including links of a lot of abnormal things about this massacre. Not sure what is going on, but I do not believe we have the truth.
The paragraph is about 2/3 the page down under ‘Related Murder/Coverups’
Actually I an just very good at discerning the truth, from the propaganda. There is no way a rational person can look at the “evidence” we have been given, and believe what the media has told us.
THEN if you bother to look around for 10 mins, at the weird coverage, and do the slightest bit of investigation on your own, there is no way a non-lazy person could swallow the story.
It is high drama, and emotionally based people see what they want to see.
And people who seek the truth see something all together different than a hollywood motion picture.
The professor has every right to raise these questions since I've yet to hear conslusive evidence of what actually took place in that school.
From the very onset, there were reports of a second individual seen behind the school, which proved false.
That the shooter casually strolled into the school since he had been identified as the son of "the teacher" whose classroom he targeted.
That too was false, he had actually broken a window in order to let himself in and his mother WAS NOT A TEACHER in the school let alone the teacher of the classroom he assaulted.
The media also reported that he had first killed his father in NJ before returning home to kill his mother and that was also a lie.
Now there is video evidence of a rifle sized weapon being removed from the trunk of the car after all reports say that the weapon used to kill those children was an "assault" weapon while at the same time saying the shooter was found to have four handguns in his posession.
So Who's lying?
video 2 Mother talks about painting her daughters white coffin with sharpies....okay she wasn't allowed to identify body...no tears.
Today I noticed that the supermarket was in the process of completely reorganizing the cereal aisle. The place where my $9+ cereal used to be now had the same brand and type but a much smaller box that was marked on the shelf exactly the price I paid yesterday for a box of the $9+ size.
So I am guessing that the brand and type is computer linked to shelf location to get the current (this morning's) price and someone updated the computer before they got the aisle reorganized. The people doing the work seemed in a bit of a hurry.
That was human error. This is likely google error.
It is not merely ‘odd’, it is total crap. These people are a fake as a $3 bill.
They wanted to go after our guns and this is the play. It is actually a “two-fer” because they get to ignore effing our economy. I mean, this week alone they are pulling so much crap, they are 5 shades of brown.
Now they are shoving Hagel the fagel down our throats and give us all the finger while dancing a jig. People are now voting with their wallets and they are buying GUNS in record numbers, the liars are hiring extra armed security because they know darned well that people are pissed too.
They wanted this war. They did everything in their power to make one. AND now, it is going to be a hot time in the old town tonight.
Even the Russians are scratching their heads at these idiots.
I saw that earlier today and I looked around on google myself, and there it was- how weird is that? AND then combined with the Facebook page for sympathy notes, four days before.
They must want us to figure it out. II am dumbfounded that anyone believes the media/government story, myself.
The school nurse and the medical examiner sealed it for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.