Posted on 01/04/2013 1:34:11 AM PST by ednoonan7
For Immediate Release Jan 3, 2013: Federal Judge England's "non-stop ridicule" of Attorney Orly Taitz offended Courtroom Visitors!
By Plaintiff: Edward C. Noonan
There is only one term that can describe Sacramento’s Chief Federal Judge Morrison C. England Jr. And that term is a Cesspool bottom-feeder. I have nothing but contempt for this unprofessional pig.
I sat at the Plaintiff’s table with Orly Taitz and I was filled with outrage at the way this scum-bag was treating my attorney. And, of course, while he was ridiculing my attorney, he was likewise ridiculing me.
At the beginning, anyone with at least two brain cells in their head, could tell that England was bent on making the hearing a mockery of justice and had no impartiality in the matter before him...NONE! He declared that OBAMA WAS THE PRESIDENT AND THE MATTER HAD ALREADY BEEN CERTIFIED BY THE HAWAIIAN HEALTH DIRECTOR. Orly tried to tell him that this so-called "birth certificate" had been proven to be a forgery and Sheriff Apario had declared the document to be fraudulent, but England did not want any facts to be presented to him…he already had his mind made up.
He chided Orly for being sanctioned by other courts throughout the United States. He acted as if all of Orly's cases had been given a fair hearing and the cases were lost by poor evidence and poor witnesses. Orly told the scumbag judge that not a single judge in the United States had given her an honest chance for DISCOVERY and a fair hearing.
But at least it was easy to tell when England was lying! Whenever his lips moved and words came out of his mouth it was ANOTHER LIE! Not a single word he said had the slightest appearance of truth. For instance, he rebuked Orly for not giving the Federal government “proper service.” But Orly was slapped down when she attempted to testify that a private process service had provided the service (for $500). He did not want to hear any of our challenges concerning the illegal alien, SOETORO. It was his firm desire to ignore all the crimes concerning Soetoro’s bogus and felonious birth certificate, selective service registration and bogus social security number(s). England wanted to shut his eyes to these reports of crimes and refused hear any of Orly’s charges of these felonies being committed by the illegal alien scum-bag in the White House. England happily became a conspirator of the crimes of Soetoro and likewise became a collaborator in the felonys of the law-breaker-in-chief.
England offended me every time words came out of his lying mouth, and I continuously sat shaking my head directly at him showing him I did not agree with him. I was hoping he would address me so I could give him a piece of my mind but he was too much of a chicken poop to confront me as a plaintiff. The Federal Marshals were more concerned at my silent angry body-language as I glared at this ridiculing bozo on the bench.
The Sacramento Bee gave a somewhat accurate hearsay version of the court proceedings. You can read their leftist version at: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/01/03/5091099/orly-taitzs-obama-birther-claims.html#storylink=cpy
The Bee version got it somewhat correct and that is concerning the dissatisfaction of most of the packed crowd in the courtroom. They report, "The reaction from courtroom watchers was unmistakable. "Mockery," one man shouted as he stormed out, followed by another who was holding his nose.
"That really stinks," he proclaimed.
The Federal Marshals were visibly concerned and scared of a possible riot of the crowd and quickly ordered all 70-80 of us out of the courtroom (after the cesspool judge denied the TRO.) So we all retired out into the hallway and then while we were clapping for Orly for the fantastic job she did in the slug fest with this corrupt Federal Judge, the Marshals ordered us out of the building. They said we were to remove ourselves to the outside of the building - - implying that we were not welcome in their FEDERAL COURT BUILDING.
I wonder what career promises were made to England in exchange for the circus he provided today? I am sure England’s bank account will soon show an increase and Soetoro (aka BHO) will forever be in his debt.
Plaintiff: Edward C. Noonan Founder - National Committee Chairman American Resistance Party
Sacramento Bee photo
Some other LEFTIST 1/3/13 writeups:
http://www.lodinews.com/ap/state/article_49be0d7e-560a-11e2-914f-0017a4aa4fba.html
http://m.utsandiego.com/news/2013/jan/03/judge-rejects-birther-challenge-to-electoral-count/
http://www.vcstar.com/news/2013/jan/03/judge-rejects-birther-challenge-to-electoral/?print=1
Since one is not considered a citizen until reaching the age of consent it is not possible to transfer citizenship to a child.
Dude, someone pulled that out of their backside. People under the "age of consent" (whatever that is) have citizenship. If they have a parent who is an American, they have American citizenship. Period.
As late as 2007 Obama was claiming to be Kenyan born. Hillary was the first to ‘drop the ball’ so to speak when she saw the complicity and corruption of the msm and backed away from the chance to challenge. Amazing how you suspect so little of the Obama fraud - far surpassing that of Kerry - so what’s your opinion of the swift boat vets?
BTW ‘talking points’ represent spinning the truth - the primary weapon of msm/dem/lib prevaricators, but then I repeat myself.
That we have a likely usurper in the White House, who forged birth documents, fails e-verify, is using another man's social security, has likely lied about graduating from Columbia, and half of the voters still continue to elect him....well...it is just too much.
It helps to be Christian knowing that those who have enabled this travesty, as well as Obama himself, will stand before the Lord is comforting.
View:
AGENDA
Grinding America Down
vimeo.com & / & 52009124
The Swift Boat Vets were just reminding everyone of something John Kerry did to himself in public. It’s a matter of public record that he lied about what happened in Vietnam.
I doesn’t matter where Obama was born. There is no question that his mother was an American citizen. That made him an American citizen at birth, and therefore eligible for the presidency.
So Hillary “dropped the ball.” Then McCain. Then Romney? What about the RNC? What about other candidates? Why didn’t Sarah Palin get involved. Is she okay with having a “usurper” in the oval office instead of her running mate? Is Sarah in on the conspiracy, too? I noticed that your chronology of ball-dropping stopped at Hillary Clinton. Please continue and explain how every other one of Obama’s opponents passed up this golden opportunity to take him down.
Again, you are shootijng with blanks. Citizenship does not exist until the age of consent.
Again, you are shooting with blanks. Citizenship does not exist until the age of consent.
I’ve been reading between the lines and finding many hidden truths on the internet since the late 1990’s. It’s really not that hard to see where the msm truths end and the lies and cover-ups begin if one just pays a little attention and applies some much needed critical thinking.
Jeesh, some sheeple just never read, listen, learn, discover, share, inquire nor consider - it’s like only the established authorities in the media, schools, & gov can be trusted ehh? /s
I won’t be answering anymore of your questions either since it is so apparently a dead end and closed mind...
This is simply incorrect. The Supreme Court recognized that those persons born to British fathers who adhered to British loyalty were natural-born subjects of Great Britain. IOW, the mother's citizenship is legally irrelevant in terms of natural citizenship. Second, the Supreme Court said you could be either British or a U.S. Citizen, by treaty, but you can't be both. Again, this is in terms of natural-born citizenship. The only thing that could make Obama a citizen is the 14th amendment, but the court said the 14th amendment DOES not define natural-born citizens. Further, statutory law places several requirements on the children born abroad of U.S. citizen mothers before the child can be recognized as a U.S. citizens. What you believe about just being born to a citizen mother simply is not true.
Argumentum Ad Ridiculum - Last but not least is the weapon of the loser and that is argumentum ad ridiculum or in plain English appeal to mockery and horse laugh. This of course has no intellectual value and serves only as a feel good factor for the loser.
You lose.
A baby is born. What country is it a citizen of? No country? The country of one or both parents?
If your mother was an American citizen, you were born an American citizen. Your mom didn't have to fill out any paperwork or anything. You were a citizen at the time of birth.
Seriously, this isn't difficult stuff here. ========================================================= If born abroad, Obama was not even a US citizen at birth. Why? According to the US law in effect in 1961, Obama's mother was too young to confer her US citizenship to her son. Law required that US citizen parent of a baby born abroad had to be a US resident for at least 5 years after the age of 14.
Smokeyblue: You lose.
In the make-believe world with citizenship laws that don't exist and Supreme Court rulings that never happened, I lose.
In the real world, where people actually have to prove things, Obama is still president.
None of you guys can explain why the RNC or any other prominent Republican will launch a serious challenge on this slum-dunk winning issue. Mitt Romney just spent half a billion dollars trying to win the presidency. Please explain why he doesn't have a team of the best conservative lawyers in the country in Washington right now fighting to prove he lost due to fraud.
OK, maybe Romney's a big loser, but what about Sarah Palin? Again: Sarah Palin has built her career taking on corruption, even when it wasn't what the GOP-e wanted her to do. This is a woman who would have been VP is it weren't for Obama's supposed fraudulent presidency. She might even be president now. Despite so much on the line both personally and patriotically, Sarah Palin hasn't even lifted a finger. Is she a big loser, too? Come on guys, clear this up for me, since you're so full of information.
Silence is consent, guys. The deafening silence on this issue means, "Yeah, OK, we accept Obama as a legitimate candidate." Why? Could it possibly be because he is? If he isn't you have a lot of explaining to do.
I'm going to take your collective silence on this question (which I've repeated several times) to mean that you think Sarah Palin is in on the fraud, in which case... well... I'll keep it civil and just say I think you should be ashamed of your position.
This is a woman who would have been VP is it weren't forObama's supposed fraudulent presidency.Romney and his people backstabbing her and floating "Diva" stories right before the election.
Now that is believable. It also reinforces the question of why a campaign that would be willing to tear down Sarah Palin for false things wouldn't be willing to tear down Barack Obama for (supposedly) true things.
Of course your arguement is non-sensical.
Just because crime X occurs and group A, B or C do nothing about it does not negate the occurence of the crime.
Falsely conflating the two issues is a distraction of YOUR own silence and support for Obama. You OWN Obama. He’s all YOURS.
But ....
Palin did drop a lot in my estimation when she said nothing about Lt. Col. Lakin being sent to prison over the issue.
RNC is a fund-raising organization for the same pigs at the same trough.
And Romney only fights conservatives.
Just because crime X occurs and group A, B or C do nothing about it does not negate the occurence of the crime.
Yes, but if group A, B or C are direct victims of that crime and they don't even claim that crime X occurred, then it seriously calls into question the claim that crime X occurred.
Palin did drop a lot in my estimation when she said nothing about Lt. Col. Lakin being sent to prison over the issue.
What about when she lost an election to someone who wasn't eligible and failed to do anything about it? What's your estimation of that? My estimation is that Palin is a common-sense conservative who has no time for any of this birther nonsense. I believe that she's bright enough to understand that Obama was an eligible candidate. Apparently, you, like the MSM, think she's stupid.
OK, so you've admitted that you don't think much of Palin or Romney. I'm going to guess that you'd be equally dismissive of McCain. What about Newt Gingrich? What about Rick Santorum? Michele Bachmann? Are they are RINOs who only fight conservatives? Or have they "dropped" in your estimation, too? Who did stand up for LTC Lakin? It seems like there's more conservatives on your fecal roster than the average DUmmie.
So that's my final reason for rejecting the birther crowd: I don't want to have to smear people like Sarah Palin because they don't buy into a ridiculous conspiracy theory.
You OWN Obama. He’s all YOURS.
Is that the new rule? When you recognize that an opposition candidate is eligible you OWN him? So I I guess OWNed Clinton, too.
I gave money to conservative candidates, including members of congress who will act as a firewall to Obama's policies. I could have done more, but because I wasn't running around the country like a clown inventing ridiculous legal claims, I now OWN Obama.
Meanwhile, you're on a conservative forum, bad mouthing conservatives and sewing division. I'm not the one who has to defend his actions here.
Funny how you like to focus on those not involved in the crime and their lack of action instead of focusing on YOUR CRIMINAL BUDDY OBAMA and his actions.
My opinion of Palin is irrelevant and would take up too much of my time to post fully about it.
Apparently, you, like the MSM, think she's stupid.
Reductio ad absurdum
Argumentum ad ridiculum
You lose. Again.
OK, so you've admitted that you don't think much of Palin or Romney. I'm going to guess that you'd be equally dismissive of McCain. What about Newt Gingrich? What about Rick Santorum? Michele Bachmann? Are they are RINOs who only fight conservatives? Or have they "dropped" in your estimation, too? Who did stand up for LTC Lakin? It seems like there's more conservatives on your fecal roster than the average DUmmie.
Again, what groups A,B, or C do or do not do has no bearing on the fact that crime X occurred.
You spend a lot of time putting YOUR WORDS in other peoples mouths.
And yes, you deserve everything the Usurper gives you since you support him.
I thought I'd read all the citizenship arguments here, but this is a new one. Are you claiming that 16-year-olds are not citizens, no matter where they were born or who their parents were? And that since they can't transfer citizenship they don't have, all the children of teenage parents in this country are not citizens? If Bristol Palin's son had been born two months earlier, he would not have been an American citizen, much less a natural born one? Do they suddenly become citizens when their parents reach the age of consent (whatever that is--does it vary by state?), or are they never citizens unless they get naturalized?
Do you have any support at all for this idea?
The Hawaiian Department of Health has replaced the Supreme Court of the United States. It they to whom one must now direct appeals of any lower court decision in regard to the citizenship status of one Barack Hussein Obama Jr. (or II), or indeed candidates in general.
This is because the SCOTUS has been far too busy to concern itself with the minor legal matter of the constitutional eligibility issue in regard to Presidential Candidates.
Now in regard to this Sheriff Joe fellow: he has gone ahead and developed evidence that that the Social Security, Selective Service, and Birth records of the present WH recumbent are faulty, more than likely ... gasp ... fraudulent! Bravo and multi-kudos for this fearless chap and so what?
Sheriffs are elected county officials empowered to investigate crimes, arrest any alleged perpetrators, and remit them for trial to the local District Attorney ... and that's all folks! (Well that's all except for confiscating private property, or evicting deadbeats when so directed by higher authority.)
IOW, Sheriff Joe, praise and protect him Jesus, has the goods but nowhere to sell them and there's no one to buy them. This judge therefore ridiculed Orly because he can.
In re Orly: Observing her OJT as an Attorney has been painful indeed (and she is getting better at it) ... but that's the way it goes in 21st C America: you need a lawyer to contest the obvious ineligibilty of a gay foreigner to serve as POTUS? You go to a Dentist. Perhaps because watching the cowardice and misfeasance of the courts and elected officials is as painful as root canal sans novocaine?
It's been enough to drive a really skilled Lawyer like Mario Apuzzo back to handling DUI and Wills and Trust. It even drove the redoubtable Attorney Leo Donofrio back to rock and roll music and professional poker playing. Instead of the SCOTUS reading his masterful amicus brief to the corn pone Georgia Supreme Court, he gets to join Sheriff Joe on the "So What?" squad. BTW, do read that document:
www.scribd.com › Research › Law
cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/tag/amicus-curiae-brief/
All it would have taken to crush the Mombasa MF would have been one man (or woman) an AG in any state to merely exercise their constitutional authority and remove him from any ballot. To fight that move, if he so desired, Kid Kenya would than have to sue ... becoming the PLAINTIFF. Then, no matter what, this would have gone to the SCOTUS in a form they could not ignore ... and to the MSM in a story they could not cover up. What the hell? Apparently according to the American voting public, The Soetoro boy is just as much a natural born citizen as Marco Rubio
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.