Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge savagely ridicules Orly Taitz in Jan 3rd hearing.
American Resistance Party ^ | 1-3-2013 | Edward C. Noonan

Posted on 01/04/2013 1:34:11 AM PST by ednoonan7

For Immediate Release Jan 3, 2013: Federal Judge England's "non-stop ridicule" of Attorney Orly Taitz offended Courtroom Visitors!

By Plaintiff: Edward C. Noonan

There is only one term that can describe Sacramento’s Chief Federal Judge Morrison C. England Jr. And that term is a Cesspool bottom-feeder. I have nothing but contempt for this unprofessional pig.

I sat at the Plaintiff’s table with Orly Taitz and I was filled with outrage at the way this scum-bag was treating my attorney. And, of course, while he was ridiculing my attorney, he was likewise ridiculing me.

At the beginning, anyone with at least two brain cells in their head, could tell that England was bent on making the hearing a mockery of justice and had no impartiality in the matter before him...NONE! He declared that OBAMA WAS THE PRESIDENT AND THE MATTER HAD ALREADY BEEN CERTIFIED BY THE HAWAIIAN HEALTH DIRECTOR. Orly tried to tell him that this so-called "birth certificate" had been proven to be a forgery and Sheriff Apario had declared the document to be fraudulent, but England did not want any facts to be presented to him…he already had his mind made up.

He chided Orly for being sanctioned by other courts throughout the United States. He acted as if all of Orly's cases had been given a fair hearing and the cases were lost by poor evidence and poor witnesses. Orly told the scumbag judge that not a single judge in the United States had given her an honest chance for DISCOVERY and a fair hearing.

But at least it was easy to tell when England was lying! Whenever his lips moved and words came out of his mouth it was ANOTHER LIE! Not a single word he said had the slightest appearance of truth. For instance, he rebuked Orly for not giving the Federal government “proper service.” But Orly was slapped down when she attempted to testify that a private process service had provided the service (for $500). He did not want to hear any of our challenges concerning the illegal alien, SOETORO. It was his firm desire to ignore all the crimes concerning Soetoro’s bogus and felonious birth certificate, selective service registration and bogus social security number(s). England wanted to shut his eyes to these reports of crimes and refused hear any of Orly’s charges of these felonies being committed by the illegal alien scum-bag in the White House. England happily became a conspirator of the crimes of Soetoro and likewise became a collaborator in the felonys of the law-breaker-in-chief.

England offended me every time words came out of his lying mouth, and I continuously sat shaking my head directly at him showing him I did not agree with him. I was hoping he would address me so I could give him a piece of my mind but he was too much of a chicken poop to confront me as a plaintiff. The Federal Marshals were more concerned at my silent angry body-language as I glared at this ridiculing bozo on the bench.

The Sacramento Bee gave a somewhat accurate hearsay version of the court proceedings. You can read their leftist version at: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/01/03/5091099/orly-taitzs-obama-birther-claims.html#storylink=cpy

The Bee version got it somewhat correct and that is concerning the dissatisfaction of most of the packed crowd in the courtroom. They report, "The reaction from courtroom watchers was unmistakable. "Mockery," one man shouted as he stormed out, followed by another who was holding his nose.

"That really stinks," he proclaimed.

The Federal Marshals were visibly concerned and scared of a possible riot of the crowd and quickly ordered all 70-80 of us out of the courtroom (after the cesspool judge denied the TRO.) So we all retired out into the hallway and then while we were clapping for Orly for the fantastic job she did in the slug fest with this corrupt Federal Judge, the Marshals ordered us out of the building. They said we were to remove ourselves to the outside of the building - - implying that we were not welcome in their FEDERAL COURT BUILDING.

I wonder what career promises were made to England in exchange for the circus he provided today? I am sure England’s bank account will soon show an increase and Soetoro (aka BHO) will forever be in his debt.

Plaintiff: Edward C. Noonan Founder - National Committee Chairman American Resistance Party

Sacramento Bee photo

Some other LEFTIST 1/3/13 writeups:

http://www.lodinews.com/ap/state/article_49be0d7e-560a-11e2-914f-0017a4aa4fba.html

http://m.utsandiego.com/news/2013/jan/03/judge-rejects-birther-challenge-to-electoral-count/

http://www.vcstar.com/news/2013/jan/03/judge-rejects-birther-challenge-to-electoral/?print=1


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: afterbirfturds; birferbutthurt; eligibility; naturalborncitizen; nwo; whackamole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-187 next last
To: suijuris
If Obama's father was in fact Barrak Sr. as Barry claims, then Barry is definitely NOT a natural born citizen.

Should an important constitutional issue be decided on the basis of what a candidate says somebody else told him, particularly when it concerns an event (conception) to which he could not have been a witness? If his status as a natural born citizen is dependent upon the identity of his father, shouldn't a court require proof of paternity before deciding the NBC issue?

What should happen in a case where paternity is unknown or impossible to prove?

101 posted on 01/04/2013 9:14:05 AM PST by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: the anti-mahdi

the law does not recognize this third form of citizen. It only recognizes two. Naturalized and those born in the united states (regardless of parents).

The immigration law has changed substantially since the foundings. States no longer control. In the 1930’s limitations were put in place.

Subsequent reforms have even limited claims of birthright citizenship to “must live in the USA (military and territories count) for 10 continous years BEFORE the child is born”. The reason Taitz is a joke is because she continues to screw up basic law. It is similar to anti-second amendment types who focus on the “militia” language rather than the actual law/language/constitution.

If a third form of citizenship needs to be created, then create it by operation of the law.

sources http://www.uscis.gov


102 posted on 01/04/2013 9:23:38 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7
For the "at least she's doing something" crowd.

This is our genius legislators "doing something"...

It's called unintended consequences, and no matter Orly's intentions, she's a traveling circus clown doing absolutely nothing to advance conservatism.

And those of us without birther myopia can plainly see that she's leaving a trail of legal precedence cementing the Prez as NBC.

103 posted on 01/04/2013 9:31:44 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man (<-------currently working through post-election anger issues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Orly Taitz is an incompetent attention whore who couldn’t properly interpret the law if the Founding Fathers explained it to her in Russian.


104 posted on 01/04/2013 9:43:08 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: palmer; Godebert
In a nutshell you mistakenly changed "or" to "and". A NBC is a person born on US soil or born to two citizen parents.

Absolutely incorrect. Those born overseas to two citizen parents are citizens by statute but are not necessarily natural born citizens under the Constitution and therefore eligible to the presidency. The courts have never ruled on the matter. So says the State Department's Foreign Affairs manual.

105 posted on 01/04/2013 10:03:22 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All
Occam's razor suggests #1, but I suppose Occam was in on the conspiracy too, huh?

Depends on just what is the real conspiracy. It makes sense to me that his father was in fact Marshall Davis, but Barry has been telling everyone for years that Barrack Sr. was his father. That would make Barry a natural born citizen and disgusting liar for political gain. It would explain the expartaie meeting with the supreme court prior to his swearing in 2009 and the reason no other courts will touch the legitimate questions being raised. Also, there are some very real problems with his birth certificate, draft registration etc., etc.

Under those circumstances I can agree with your Occam's razor comment. However, natural born or not, something stinks!

Of course it also brings up a whole set of other issues such as who funded his education? Why are his transcripts withheld from the public? Is he a communist like his father Marshall Davis, etc?

106 posted on 01/04/2013 11:17:17 AM PST by suijuris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

Whatever happened to the stuff Sheriff Arpaio was to release around Dec 15?


107 posted on 01/04/2013 12:19:42 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7
Your post of much interest to me, although being a non-citizen. I remember much about Kenya from the 1950's, while living in England. A lot of work to be done yet on the status of a child born of a British subject in the United States. Perhaps it has, if so I stand corrected.

A judge surely should deal with the facts presented and not the personality of the presenter. That being said (love that phrase), This whole business often smacks of the old saw of simply:

Kill the messenger

Orly may take em' down yet.

108 posted on 01/04/2013 12:28:13 PM PST by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suijuris
However, natural born or not, something stinks!

Maybe you're right, but there's no need to go digging into secrets to find things that stink about Obama. His disastrous policies are no secret -- what's the point of revealing his college transcripts?

So what if his father was Marshall Davis? What was this supposed to tell us about "the real Obama" that we didn't see in four years of presidency? It made sense in 2008 to frame Obama as some kind of unknown figure, but by 2012, he was a well-known public figure. In fact, for me, one of the most stunning things about 2012 is that the nation did know Barack Obama and they still re-elected him. I think a lot of us are still stunned by that.

109 posted on 01/04/2013 12:29:06 PM PST by Mr. Know It All
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Mr. (or Ms.) Con-man... Could this be said of you as well, that you’re “a traveling circus clown doing absolutely nothing to advance conservatism?” Please explain what you have done today to promote Conservatism today?


110 posted on 01/04/2013 12:53:57 PM PST by ednoonan7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Hey, E. Thank you for your good wishes. A Happy New Year to you also.

I am sorry for my late reply. I just seem to have all my energy drained out of me with all the awful things that are happening in our USA. I am sure many of you good people who live in the U.S. feel the same way. I don’t think a few boxes of Girl Scout Cookies right now could make me feel better…At least not for long.

“I no longer wonder how Germany tolerated the rise of Hitler 80 years ago.

“What is worse in our case, is the Germans had no Hitler example previously to learn from—so what is our excuse?”

You are so correct! I don’t understand it either.

Panama got rid of its Hitler back in ’89 with the help of the U.S.

By the way, Noriega is more dead than alive in a jail in Panama. He will be joining Chavez and Fidel soon. Noriega has had at least a couple good strokes.

Anyway, I am thankful everything is going great in Panama. I have no complaints.

For the last 3 days, dry season is beginning to settle in. The season lasts for about 3 months. There will be some rare rains but not often. The grass will be turning brown soon until the rains start up again. With the exceptions for gardens it is not customary or encouraged to water lawns. Therefore, they will remain brown until the first rains. Within the first 36 hours or before, when the first rains begin, the lawns will start to turn green again.

I love rainy season.

Take care of yourself. Be on the alert.


111 posted on 01/04/2013 2:00:34 PM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer) (uuue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

Thanks for your note ,M, it cheered me up some.

Glad you are doing well down Panama way.

Make room—you may some boarders soon. LOL!


112 posted on 01/04/2013 2:26:10 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All; suijuris; Tau Food

Apparently MKIA simply does not know much of anything since he repeats the dem/lib talking points verbatim.

No, Biden would not become president nor any other cabinet members nor Reid nor Pelosi since they all have a hann d in this fraud. NBC is a unique requirement only for us pres/vp whereby either born here when us constitution ratified OR both parents are US citizens at time of birth.

No, I’m not holding my breath that this fraud will be exposed any time soon nor his most likely use of foriegn/minority status to attend prestigious universities.

If one does not listen to both sides of an argument, is it not like the sound of one hand clapping?


113 posted on 01/04/2013 2:38:52 PM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All

More difficult than you think.
A US citizen is not necessarily a natural citizen. They are distinct categories of citizenship.
If one is born to a US citizen over the age of consent one is an American citizen. If both parents are over the age of consent and are US citizens the baby is a natural born citizen. Only a natural born citizen, the child of US citizen parents, is able to hold the office of POTUS.
Since one is not considered a citizen until reaching the age of consent it is not possible to transfer citizenship to a child. That is, one must first be a citizen by virtue of reaching at least the legal age of consent to transfer citizenship to one’s offspring. Obama’s mother was a child in the eyes of the law and thus the victim of statutory rape when O was conceived. O is not a legal US citizen either by birth or by place of birth. Much of this is, of course, lost on the legal system.
If you really want to play with the big boys learn to swim in the deep water.


114 posted on 01/04/2013 2:55:27 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (Better the devil we can destroy than the Judas we must tolerate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7
Mr. (or Ms.) Con-man...

Seriously? "Man" too subtle a hint for ya'?

Could this be said of you as well, that you’re “a traveling circus clown doing absolutely nothing to advance conservatism?”

Nope.

Please explain what you have done today to promote Conservatism today?

NOT flying around the country pretending to be a civil rights attorney, comparing myself to Thurgood Marshall, and then blaming a massive conspiracy when it turns out I'm just a crazy cat lady dentist/monumentally incompetent lawyer.

115 posted on 01/04/2013 4:10:43 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man (<-------currently working through post-election anger issues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food; Las Vegas Ron
I'm not defending Obama. I'm defending the integrity of what is considered part of the "conservative movement." I think we have enough red meat on taxes, pro-life and liberty. We don't need to put fealty to crackpot conspiracy theories on the list. It makes us lose credibility.

Which means we are a usurped country, and no judges or Congressmen or Senators want to touch it either. We are in uncharted territory where the rule of law means not one damned thing. There is a remedy which no one would choose; but it will happen eventually if none of the prostitutes - ahem, I mean politicians and judges, do anything to remedy the lawless regime.

116 posted on 01/04/2013 4:29:48 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory; the anti-mahdi
"the law does not recognize this third form of citizen."

Wrong.

Even Barry's State Department recognizes "native-born," "natural-born" and "naturalized" citizens. All three are citizens, but all three are distinct types of citizens, mentioned separately.

Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.

....

(3) Nationality Act of 1940; Immigration and Nationality Act . (i) Applicability . The 1936 statute, as amended, was repealed by the Nationality Act of October 14, 1940, which, in turn, was superseded by the current statute; however citizenship restored under the 1936 Act, and the right to take the oath of allegiance thereunder before a naturalization court [edit: a naturalized citizen], were not affected by the later enactments. 37/

Moreover, there were included in section 317(b) of the Nationality Act of 1940, and in current section 324 almost identical provisions providing for the restoration of citizenship to women who would have been repatriated by the 1936 Act, as amended, had their marriages terminated prior to January 13, 1941, or, lacking that factor, had maintained continuous United States residence since that date of the marriage.

Termination of the marriage to an alien continued to be a requirement of the Nationality Act of 1940 and the present law but, under both statutes, the event must have occurred on or after January 13, 1941.

The repatriation provisions of these two most recent enactments also apply to a native- and natural-born citizen woman who expatriated herself by marriage to an alien racially ineligible to citizenship, a category of expatriate not covered by the earlier 1936 legislation.

...

The words "shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922", as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.

...

The effect of naturalization under the above statutes was not to erase the previous period of alienage, but to restore the person to the status if naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen, as determined by her status prior to loss

http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48575.html
117 posted on 01/04/2013 4:34:34 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Hi lj!

Happy New Year FRiend!


118 posted on 01/04/2013 4:47:38 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

What this whole fiasco needs is:
1. A plan
2. Organization
3. Responsible, dedicated, competent, interactive, collaborative supporting membership.
Then “DO IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME”!!!!!!!


119 posted on 01/04/2013 4:56:08 PM PST by Huskerfan44 (Huskerfan44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

I have only one talking point: Barack Hussein Obama has already been president for one term and will be sworn in for another term in about 6 weeks.

This is a fact.

Now, the allegation is that this fact is due to a huge fraud perpetrated by... who, exactly? The Illuminati? Space aliens? It’s the Cylons, isn’t it!

It must be someone really powerful because not even Mitt Romney will hire a lawyer to expose this supposedly obvious fraud. Did Romney run out of money? Is the Illuminati holding Anne hostage? Was Tagg revealing too much when he said he dad didn’t really want to be president? If it’s that easy to prove that BHO isn’t eligible to be president then Romney would give it a shot.

Am I supposed to believe that he’s in on the conspiracy, or is it that he can’t afford a lawyer to pursue the case? Maybe we could solicit donations.

There were nearly a dozen Republican candidates running at the start of 2012 and not a single one of them pursued this. Why?

I all seriousness, I would LOVE to hear the answer to any of these questions.


120 posted on 01/04/2013 4:57:03 PM PST by Mr. Know It All
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson