Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge in Gabby Giffords trial calls for assault weapons ban
nydailynews.com ^ | December 21, 2012 | Bill Hutchinson

Posted on 12/21/2012 6:55:00 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

The federal judge who sentenced former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' gunman is advocating a nationwide ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines to take the "mass out of mass shootings." "There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines," Judge Larry Allan Burns wrote in Thursday's Los Angeles Times.

Since Jared Lee Loughner killed six people and wounded Giffords with his 31-round magazine Glock pistol, there have been six deadlier mass shootings, Burns wrote.

"But reasonable, good-faith debates have boundaries, and in the debate about guns, a high-capacity magazine has always seemed to me beyond them," he wrote.

He noted that Adam Lanza used a semiautomatic rifle with a 30-round magazine to slaughter 20 first-graders and 6 staffers at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

James Holmes, the accused gunman in the Aurora, Colo., movie theater massacre that left 12 people dead and 58 others wounded, used a rifle with a 100-round drum, he added.

While admitting it might not prevent the next crazed gunman from going on a rampage, Burns said taking away high-capacity magazines could cut down on casualties.

"We might be able to take the 'mass' out of 'mass shooting,' or at least make the perpetrator's job a bit harder," wrote Burns, adding that he is a gun owner and a conservative appointed to the federal bench by former President George W. Bush.

Burns suggested that at a minimum the federal assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 should be brought back "with some teeth this times."

"Ban the manufacture, importation, sale, transfer and possession of both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines," he wrote.

"Don't let people who already have them keep them. Don't let ones that have already been manufactured stay on the market," he suggested, referring to two provisions in the old assault weapons ban. "I don't care whether it's called gun control or a gun ban. I'm for it."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; giffords; guncontrol; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 12/21/2012 6:55:07 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

This judge should never, ever be allowed to hear a 2A case ever in his life.


2 posted on 12/21/2012 6:57:50 PM PST by MestaMachine (It's the !!!!TREASON!!!!, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Judge. You are an idiot. You should be removed from the bench immediately. You punk communist tool.


3 posted on 12/21/2012 6:58:12 PM PST by shankbear (The tree of Liberty appears to be perishing because there are few patriots willing to refresh it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

With a 10 round magazine Giffords would still have been shot, another shot, Judge Roll killed and several others killed.

The first three rounds hit three people. A limited 10 rd mag would have made no difference.


4 posted on 12/21/2012 6:59:02 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (REOPEN THE CLOSED MENTAL INSTITUTIONS! Damn the ACLU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
"Don't let people who already have them keep them. Don't let ones that have already been manufactured stay on the market," he suggested, referring to two provisions in the old assault weapons ban. "I don't care whether it's called gun control or a gun ban. I'm for it."

And we thought all the nazis were dead and gone.
5 posted on 12/21/2012 6:59:02 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
"Don't let people who already have them keep them.

You come take them then. Yeah, that's what I thought...

6 posted on 12/21/2012 6:59:25 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
"There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines,"

No, just arm them with beanbags like the Border Patrol...

BTW, are armed Mexican cartels 'civilians' too?

7 posted on 12/21/2012 6:59:40 PM PST by rfp1234 (Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Money see, monkey do.


8 posted on 12/21/2012 7:00:32 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You cannot prevent evil. You can only defend against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

“Mark Kelly takes aim at NRA’s “defiant” statement”
http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/story/20406657/2012/12/21/mark-kelly-takes-aim-at-nras


9 posted on 12/21/2012 7:00:41 PM PST by machogirl (First they came for my tagline, (it's back). 2008, the Decline of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

There will be other mass shootings in the years to come, and this myopic appeal for banning and confiscation will grow louder.

It is the exchange of freedom for safety.


10 posted on 12/21/2012 7:01:22 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Another judge who has a problem with the Bill of Rights. There’s a lot of that going around these days.


11 posted on 12/21/2012 7:02:20 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (U.S. elections have become nothing but another cheap ripoff of American Idol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

He is entitled to his opinion as wrong as it is.

His being the Judge at the Giffords trial means nothing to me and should mean nothing to anyone else.
He expresses himself as one man, one man who has a right to an opinion as do I.

His trying to use his office as though he should be considered an expert should mean no more than the opinion of any other American, but simply exposes his bias, and Judges should not be biased.


12 posted on 12/21/2012 7:02:20 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

oopsy, didn’t see the post until after scroll. :(


13 posted on 12/21/2012 7:02:30 PM PST by machogirl (First they came for my tagline, (it's back). 2008, the Decline of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Let's compare and contrast...

"There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines," - Judge Larry Allan Burns

"Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA - ordinary citizens don't need guns, as their having guns doesn't serve the State." - Heinrich Himmler

14 posted on 12/21/2012 7:02:42 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk
It is the exchange of freedom for safety.

It wouldn't improve safety a whit.

It's the exchange for freedom for the Leftist agenda of control.

15 posted on 12/21/2012 7:04:36 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

reasonable people have absolutely no prolem with high capacity magazines. we have problems with people who don’t understand what the 2a is all about. we have problems with gun-free zones where these idiots go to shoot unarmed defenseless people made defenseless by the libtard idiots themselves.


16 posted on 12/21/2012 7:07:55 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

they won’t they’ll send their minions to take em.


17 posted on 12/21/2012 7:09:01 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lurk

safety? who’s safer disarmed?


18 posted on 12/21/2012 7:09:31 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

They want a war.


19 posted on 12/21/2012 7:10:41 PM PST by RC one (From My Cold Dead Hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

if not having guns makes eveyone safer, disarm the police, the secret service, and the military. make government live under the same laws.


20 posted on 12/21/2012 7:10:50 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson