Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/17/2012 3:17:06 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

The DOE was charging the electric utilities a 1 mill/MWH nuclear generation fee to pay for Yucca. Literally billions of ratepayer dollars were poured into their coffers during that era. The utility companies that own both coal and nuclear facilities should get together and decide what day/hour/second to shut them all down in unison...hopefully either the coldest or hottest day of the year....and leave them down till the govt. crap ceases. They’re evil anyway so just shut em all down at once.


2 posted on 12/17/2012 3:34:26 PM PST by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It is maddening to see this administration put up obstacles that will affect so many aspects of our future.


3 posted on 12/17/2012 3:41:41 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The Republican Party has worked mightily over the past generation to grant more and more power to the executive branch. The Republicans were told by the good Judeo-Christian conservative pundits that the American population was basically conservative, so even if the Democrats continued to control congress, it would be Republican presidents out as far as the eye could see.

Now the Democrats control the executive branch.

Oops!

Also, the good hardworking capitalists in the real estate industry, and the good Judeo-Christian conservative California pundits convinced people that moving out of high-cost liberal California and out to Las Vegas would be a great idea.

Unfortunately, a lot of the people that moved out there were NIMBY wimps who lobbied their congresscritters to oppose Yucca.

As Milton Friedman warned us: unintended consequences are a bitch.

6 posted on 12/17/2012 5:50:23 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
The Yucca Mountain story is long, but it shows how determined the left is in screwing everything up!

President Obama's Taxpayer-Backed Green Energy Failures

Let’s Have That Conversation About Guns

Five-Point Action Plan for President Obama to Reduce Violence by the Mentally Ill

As a Newtown resident, parent, and law abiding gun owner…

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

7 posted on 12/17/2012 5:50:37 PM PST by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy

Ah the ole bugaboo of Nevada democrats. Nimby nimby.

I say put the waste under Reid’s house, maybe he’ll mutate into someone less annoying.


11 posted on 12/17/2012 11:39:39 PM PST by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; SunkenCiv; gandalftb; AFPhys
More than 90 % of the nuclear fuel is still in the fuel when it is removed from the reactor and considered as waste.The main reason spent fuel is removed from reactors is not because of a lack of usable energy, but because of the degradation of the cladding that keeps the fuel intact. It is a waste of fuel and a waste of space for a repository (Yucca Mountain) not use more of the fuel.

Already in 1999 Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) suggested that the spent fuel should be transmuted. http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/1999/aug/06/domenicis-plan-could-contain-yuccas-fate/ After transmutation the waste needs to be stored some 300 years instead of 100 000 years. The main reason for the long time is the transuraniums. http://www.ornl.gov/~webworks/cpr/pres/109121_.pdf In 1999 the best solution was assumed to be accelerator transmutation of the waste, but nowadays a better technology is just to burn the waste in a reactor. It could be an http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_Fast_Reactor using metal as coolant or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten_salt_reactor using salt.

12 posted on 12/17/2012 11:56:52 PM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This is an excellent short history of Yucca Mountain and the challenge of nuclear waste storage, at least the early parts and the later parts. However, it completely leaves out what occurred in the 90’s.

The bottom line of that is that Congress tasked the President and executive to accomplish this goal; Clinton and his DoE secretary booted that responsibility in the mid-90s, under pressure of Reid and a few others in Congress. Clinton’s failure to lead at that time brought the problem to Bush’s desk, and Reid just about single-handedly brought the waste of billions of dollars to its conclusion by stalling and obfuscating the project.

If Clinton had taken seriously the responsibility that Congress had handed the executive a decade earlier, and forced his Energy Secretary to get the project underway, we would have had Yucca Mt commissioned by the middle of Bush’s term.


13 posted on 12/18/2012 8:42:32 AM PST by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson