Posted on 11/17/2012 8:43:05 AM PST by Renfield
This week financial news organization CNBC gave some mainstream attention to the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History, in which “Banksters” and their U.S. racketeering partners are being accused of laundering of 43 trillion dollars worth of ill gotten gains.
The lawsuit is said to involve officials located in the highest offices of government and the financial sector.
Since this information was surprisingly revealed by the mainstream news organization there has been a very suspicious and deadly fallout at the CNBC headquarters.
Within hours the original page for the article was taken down, and CNBC senior vice president Kevin Krim received news that his children were killed under very suspicious circumstances.
It seems that the murder happened first and then the page was removed later.
According to mainstream accounts the children’s nanny is responsible for the murders, allegedly stabbing both children.
However, those same mainstream news sources report the highly unlikely story that the nanny slit her own throat just after committing the homicides.
Police have released very little information and although a wider plot has not been officially implicated, it seems very possible that these murders are a show of force against the press organization for releasing such damning information about the most powerful people in the world.
Here is some more information about the lawsuit from the Wall Street Journal:
“In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP — on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws — has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) by the “Banksters” and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the “bailout programs” by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other “bailout money” advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress.
Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the “Banksters” criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama’s campaign from these same “Banksters” to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the “Bankster” Defendants. “
Some of the alleged conspirators are Attorney General Holder, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary, Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former “communications director” for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the “Banksters” themselves, and their affiliates and conduits.
It is expected that all news on this subject will be removed from CNBC, and that other news organizations will be discouraged from covering such information.
However, screen shots of the original CNBC article were taken to verify the authenticity of this story.
Assassination and brute intimidation are common strategies for the ruling class to use on people who may threaten their agenda.
This is the second situation this week in which a high level executive was the victim of a suspicious attack that seemed very much like an assassination.
The Intel Hub just reported that Nicholas Mockford, a 60 year old British executive for the oil company ExxonMobil was shot dead in front of his wife in an assassination-style killing in Brussels.
We will be keeping a close eye on both of these stories and provide more details as they become available.
Note: You can read the lawsuit here.
Remember, as dirty as he is, Obama is just the Manchurian washer-woman, laundering the cash as best he can. He is a puppet of the Banksters. This kind of stuff has been going on whenever there was a Central Bank in existence in the United States. The Federal Reserve is the latest incarnation of it, so we have (latterly) had nearly 100 years of financial fraud piled upon us. The pile is now toppling over.
Sounds good, net:net, the bank portion of TARP made the Treasury over $22 billion.
To me, the TARP program was a failure in that it prevented capitalism from actually working - punishing the stupid with failure
Stupid bankers weren't punished? Really?
Bilderbergers?
They didn't take losses. The taxpayers did.
Banks lost tens of billions. When taxpayers defaulted on their mortgages. It was in all the papers.
You didn't pay attention to post #38, did you?
I'm sorry, was my ridicule of post #38 too subtle?
Manipulating interest rates and currency for the purpose of gaining control of assets at a fraction of their real value is indeed theft.
Banks do that? It should be harder for them to lose money, if that were the case. Maybe you should call them up and let them know what you know?
You don't, by any chance, work for the Federal Reserve,do you?
I own it.
The nanny woke up.
She said she was angry about being asked to do housework.
She admitted to hurting the children but would not go as far as saying she had killed them.
No, just clumsy and impertinent.
...Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other “bailout money” advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress.
Yeah, I clumsily refuted your post.
Yeah, did you help him with that one?
Bilderbergers?
They didn't take losses. The taxpayers did.
Banks lost tens of billions. When taxpayers defaulted on their mortgages. It was in all the papers.
Well said, bankers have been taking advantage of all Americans,the 1% has nothing to do with it, it is all about corruption and greed, sadly, it crosses both party lines.
Celebrities, socialites, and some charities have been laundering their funds and spreading them among not only themselves but their elite friends too for quite some time, they are like slush funds for them, the funds don’t go where they should, look at the salaries of those who run these charities, look at where the funds go, that’s where the real story is.
Read it. The silly, stupid errors made me laugh.
Thank you so much for these insights, dearest sister in Christ!
*
It's easy to write staggering fiction.
The article looked like someone’s blog instead of a news story.
$43 Trillion. Yeah right.
The opening remarks in the title were about a man’s children being killed by a nanny juxtaposed against a lawsuit over ‘ill gotten gains’ by ‘banks’. The man, being a ‘bankster’.
Had you read my initial remark, you might have gleaned I was talking about the nanny and the ‘reason’ for the story in the first place. I don’t give a crap about the media’s version of TARP; they all lie. Likely, an immense portion of it ended up in Obama’s re-election campaign and then as “walking around money” for his voters in the form of Obama Phones, UIC extensions, TANF work relaxation of rules, etc.
No kidding, screen writers make a living at it. But for a consumer to “suspend reality” it must have some realistic ground.
No, stupid bankers were not punished.
If they had been, then Citigroup would have ceased to exist. BofA would be broken up and out of business today. Their books are packed with crap debt.
BofA obviously never did even a hint of due diligence on their acquisition of Countrywide, and that should have been their death penalty.
Playing stupid games should merit stupid prizes.
Jimmy Cayne lost $1 billion.
Not sure how much Dick Fuld lost, but it had to have been in the 9 figures.
If they had been, then Citigroup would have ceased to exist. BofA would be broken up and out of business today.
Bankers can't be punished unless their bank fails?
How much did Ken Lewis and Pandit lose?
BofA obviously never did even a hint of due diligence on their acquisition of Countrywide, and that should have been their death penalty.
They bought it because the Treasury and Fed begged them to. I agree it was stupid. And that no bank will ever do that again, no matter who asks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.