Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meet the Press Panel Blames Romney Loss on Limbaugh and ‘Loons and Wackos’ of Conservative Base
Newsbusters ^

Posted on 11/11/2012 5:33:53 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Meet the Press Panel Blames Romney Loss on Limbaugh and ‘Loons and Wackos’ of Conservative Base By Brent Baker Created 11/11/2012 - 6:01pm

Sunday’s Meet the Press featured a panel of five, none of them conservative (Congressman-elect Joaquín Castro, Republican strategist Steve Schmidt, author Doris Kearns Goodwin, the Washington Post’s Bob Woodward and NBC’s Chuck Todd), to assess why Mitt Romney lost and “the future of the GOP.” And they agreed conservatives are the problem.

Todd, NBC’s political director, decided the GOP has become “a coalition of special interest forces” and fretted “the leaders in Washington can’t control the special interest groups” as Republicans, like Democrats in the past, “succumbed to their base.”

As if the Obama campaign this year didn’t succumb to and exploit the liberal feminist agenda on Planned Parenthood.

Steve Schmidt, who managed John McCain’s 2008 loss, argued that “to too many swing voters in the country, when you hear the word conservative now, they think of loons and wackos.”

In an obvious allusion to Rush Limbaugh, a clip of whom host David Gregory had played earlier, Schmidt snarled: “Our elected leaders are scared to death of the conservative entertainment complex, the shrill and divisive voices that are bombastic and broadcasting out into the homes.”

Earlier, liberal historian Doris Kearns Goodwin declared: “The fundamental loss of this campaign probably took place in the Republican primaries when they put out a group of people who were so far off the political cliff on issues that mattered to Latinos, to women and to young people.”

(Picking up on how the new Lincoln movie is based on Goodwin’s Team of Rivals book, host David Gregory cued her up to explain how Obama can “be a great President” like Lincoln: “The polarization then so profound; as this President now strives to be a great President, like Lincoln, what is his challenge to break this polarization? Does it all come back to bipartisanship at some level?)

From the Sunday, November 11 Meet the Press:

CHUCK TODD: Let’s look back at the Republican Party. How did they become a coalition of special interest forces? They really do look like the Democratic Party of the ‘70s and ‘80s where they seem to -- the leaders in Washington can’t control the special interest groups. And this is what happened to the Democrats, labor, all of these special interest groups that were, the folks in Washington knew what the right way was to try to win national elections. They couldn’t quite do it because they were -- basically, they succumbed to their base. The Democratic Party, started with Bill Clinton, and Obama successfully has been able to carry this over, has never been able to allow the base of the Democratic Party, special interest groups, to overtake the national message. The Republican Part, it’s unbelievable that they have allowed to happen.

STEVE SCHMIDT: Conservatism is a serious governing philosophy that has served this country well. But to too many swing voters in the country, when you hear the word conservative now, they think of loons and wackos. We gave up five U.S. Senate seats over the last two election cycles by people who were just out there, completely extreme, manifestly unprepared for the offices that they’re, that they’re running for. Our elected leaders are scared to death of the conservative entertainment complex, the shrill and divisive voices that are bombastic and broadcasting out into the homes. And this country is rejecting the social extremism of the Republican Party on issue after issue. And if you look at the four states that legalized gay marriage, on a range of issues, our coalition is shrinking and the Republican Party has a lot of soul searching to do if we are going to assemble a majority.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gopcivilwar; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
HA!
1 posted on 11/11/2012 5:34:01 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

And the beat goes on.


2 posted on 11/11/2012 5:37:08 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

That’s odd because I blame the media and the 47%.


3 posted on 11/11/2012 5:37:14 PM PST by linn37 (Newt supporter here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Meet the Press???? What is Meet the Press? Don’t watch it, never heard of it. BUT I know who Rush Limbaugh is!!! Go Rush!


4 posted on 11/11/2012 5:37:14 PM PST by Taggart_D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Now they have flipped to say Mitt’s ideas were what the nation needs.

Also why do they want the GOP to win?


5 posted on 11/11/2012 5:37:33 PM PST by NoLibZone ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Our huge 2010 WIN is owed to OUR TEA PARTY.

Romney ran AWAY from OUR TEA PARTY!


6 posted on 11/11/2012 5:38:55 PM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

OF COURSE.

Meet the Depressed is as far left as it always has been. And, of course, the rank in file GOP elites like Boehner will come a-whoring along to agree with them.

Did you EVER hear of a mainstream media organ OR the Democrat Party blaming THEIR loss on “left-wing loons”?


7 posted on 11/11/2012 5:39:22 PM PST by ZULU (See video: http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-first-siege-of-vienna.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
No, this was the problem:

8 posted on 11/11/2012 5:41:31 PM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Romney...probably a pleasant fellow but not the kind of MAN that I want leading the nation. No fire in the belly.


9 posted on 11/11/2012 5:41:55 PM PST by ptsal (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Also why do they want the GOP to win?

lol.....they don't.
10 posted on 11/11/2012 5:42:03 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

“Did you EVER hear of a mainstream media organ OR the Democrat Party blaming THEIR loss on “left-wing loons”?”

No, because they made sure their left wing loon won. :(


11 posted on 11/11/2012 5:42:40 PM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Like Rush said the other day...I’m sure all those Dems that say what’s wrong with the Republican Party are really looking out for them.


12 posted on 11/11/2012 5:42:45 PM PST by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Now they have flipped to say Mitt’s ideas were what the nation needs. ..................... Of course, they’re getting ready for 2016, they want him to run again, so he can lose again.


13 posted on 11/11/2012 5:42:57 PM PST by Bringbackthedraft (Who we elect is not as important as who they bring in with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Steve, here's your sign!

14 posted on 11/11/2012 5:44:02 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Romney would have been much better than the Marxist.


15 posted on 11/11/2012 5:44:24 PM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

“Romney...probably a pleasant fellow but not the kind of MAN that I want leading the nation. No fire in the belly.”

He had something during the first debate but at Newt must’ve learned, you need more than just one good debate performance.


16 posted on 11/11/2012 5:44:44 PM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

memo to meet the press historians....(cough cough)

History is clear. When there is huge ideological wedge, Republicans win big. When the divide is fuzzy, Democrats win.
80: Reagan in rout over libeal Carter
84: Reagan in historic landslide over liberal Mondale.
88: We thought Bush 41 was conservative at that time, and he wins in route
92: Bush 41 outted as moderate, and Clinton blurs line, along with perot
94: Most ideolgoical and national mid term ever, GOP in ROUTE.
96: Dole? Puh leeze
00: No clear message, muddled result
02: Democrats out themselves as radicals, GOP picks up seats
04: Kerry Edwards far left weirdos, giving Bush just enough room
06: Moderate GOP down in flames
08: Moderate McCain down in flames
10: like 94, very ideological and results in historic route
12: moderate Mitt down in flames.

History is so so so clear.
hell, even in the screwy year of 98, Jesse Ventura’s third party win in Minnesota was the most conservative campaign in the nation. Now Jesse was too stupid to govern as a conservative, but he did, absolutely, campaign as one. Check the record!!)


17 posted on 11/11/2012 5:44:44 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright ("WTF?: How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost....Again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I blame massive voter fraud. Until only LEGAL voting is allowed, the election process will be constantly hijacked by the rats. No conservative or Republican will ever win a national election until voter fraud is stopped.
18 posted on 11/11/2012 5:45:07 PM PST by Licensed-To-Carry (Hey Obama! It's all your fault now, you own it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Romney would have had a whole lot less votes without the loons and wackos. The ones that voted for Obama wouldn’t have voted for Romney if he ditched us, the loons and wackos. As I see it Romney did keep his distance from the far right.

Most of the press would have voted for Obama no matter what. Maybe Romney could have won if they didn’t pick sides? Maybe the press should show more respect to free speech. They only want their speech recognized.

That’s the problem with our media—they’re all a bunch of flockin’ mini-tyrants.

Control freaks.


19 posted on 11/11/2012 5:46:46 PM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Doris Kearns Goodwin”

What does this thieving, plagerizing leftist bytch know about politics.


20 posted on 11/11/2012 5:47:18 PM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson