[Rembrandt]

“So with another four years for President Obama..”

There’s another issue not being culled out.

If a company has x hours of work required to complete a set of tasks and has to cut the hours of some number of workers, they still have x hours of work to be done. That means more part-time workers must be hired and trained to complete the x hours of work.

That then requires additional supervisors because of the inefficiencies introduced by the additional workers, more people to hire, train, supervise, fire, etc.

This translates to higher costs which must be passed along in cost of goods, so the ultimate “beneficiary” of Obama’s policies is the consumer paying higher prices for the same stuff.

[FrogMom]

"If a company has x hours of work required to complete a set of tasks and has to cut the hours of some number of workers, they still have x hours of work to be done. That means more part-time workers must be hired and trained to complete the x hours of work.

That then requires additional supervisors because of the inefficiencies introduced by the additional workers, more people to hire, train, supervise, fire, etc.

This translates to higher costs which must be passed along in cost of goods, so the ultimate “beneficiary” of Obama’s policies is the consumer paying higher prices for the same stuff."

It also translates into "new jobs" for BO to claim.