| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 10/26/2012 4:52:29 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 10/26/2012 4:43:08 PM PDT by Senator Goldwater
Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: "No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate.
So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators. Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.
It would have been a presidential decision. There was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?
Romney needs to hit Obama the communist hard on this Obama refusing to give aid to Americans who were being attacked by Muslims
This is freedom and America’s last stand. If that communist Muslim Obama wins then the socialists achieve their goal of destroying freedom forever. Do everything you can to elect Romney and so save freedom.
It is October. I am not the least bit surprised.
Someone has to fall on the sword for this Incompetent Potentate. And I think it’s gonna be someone no one has mentioned (unless I missed it). Valerie Jarrett. She is de facto President as it is, and I don’t think ODrama can’t make a real decision. I think she made the decision, and it’s gonna hang on her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.