Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

>he supports abortion for incest, rape, life, AND the HEALTH of the mother

As would anyone who has any chance of being elected to a high office.


31 posted on 10/26/2012 5:30:33 AM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: soycd
There are several Freepers who would proudly and with a smile on their faces vote against any candidate who would commit to ending only 99.999% of abortions.

These Freepers call themselves "moral absolutists" and have their own pinglist as you probably know.

They call the rest of FR "baby killers" and for a while that was hurtful to me but now that I consider the source, I don't get worked up about it any more.

Of course, the 99.999% of babies who are killed every year while waiting for the perfect pro-life candidate are an issue, but I guess the boost to the self-image of the "moral absolutists" outweighs that, big time.

35 posted on 10/26/2012 7:36:20 AM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: soycd

I think you must not understand the difference between Life of the mother and the mile-wide loophole of “Health”.


40 posted on 10/26/2012 11:24:05 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson