Replies

I don't answer your question because you "moderates" are unworthy of an answer. Now be a big boy and ignore me because I certainly have no intent of letting people forget what a bottom feeding scumbag Scott Brown really is.

Scott Brown presses Republicans to be ‘more inclusive’ on abortion

Brown blasts back: I am a pro-choice Republican

I certainly have no intent of letting people forget what a bottom feeding scumbag Scott Brown really is.

For all his faults, though, Scott Brown is:

a. A vote for organizing the Senate.

b. And a vote for repealing Obamacare.

Thus, several magnitudes better than the alternative, Princess Fauxcahontas.

There is no such person elected to office in Mass. as a "conservative" Republican. Nevertheless, it has unfortunately been necessary for conservatives to depend on RINOs in order to get ANY legislation passed. Unfortunately, the GOP has historically not been able to reliably secure candidates in truly conservative states. They have not done so well in Michigan, either. If the conservatives in conservative states had proved more capable of pulling some votes in for legislation, we would not have to depend on the lousy NorthEast RINOs

For your info, here are some apropos ACU ratings:

Massachusetts      2011    2010 	Years 	Lifetime
	Kerry       5.00     0.00 	27 	 5.07
	BROWN 	   50.00    74.00 	 2 	62.00

Michigan 	   2011    2010 	Years 	Lifetime
	Levin       0.00     0.00 	33 	 6.18
	Stabenow    0.00     0.00 	11 	 7.64

At least the Massachusetts GOP has contributed somewhat to the conservative cause these last two years. Big boys understand such things. Whiners never will.

I repeat my question in a different way: How many Senate votes for strict constructionist judges likely to overturn abortion would likely come out of Michigan and how many from Massachusetts? I wager that MI (and NY) would yield zero, and MA one.

"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?" Matt 7:3 NIV