Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/18/2012 8:36:40 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Steelfish

From the information given, there’s no way to know whether this can go into mass production. But if electricity can be converted into gasoline with reasonable efficiency, then nuclear energy will fill up our gas tanks. If cold fusion can be made practical, even better.


37 posted on 10/18/2012 9:42:56 PM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
"using only air and electricity"

That should be all anyone needs to know in order to make a reasonable conclusion regarding this process. It will most likely take 100 bucks worth of electricity to produce an ounce of fuel.

I hope I'm wrong, but so far, history has shown us a 100% accuracy rate of pessimistic observations regarding any such magical energy production methods.

38 posted on 10/18/2012 9:43:56 PM PDT by FunkyZero (... I've got a Grand Piano to prop up my mortal remains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
five litres of petrol in less than three months from a small refinery in Stockton-on-Tees, Teesside

The £1.1m project, in development for the past two years

Five liters in three months, at a cost of 1.1 MILLION British Pounds.... what a bargain. So you use enough energy to power how many cities to produce this fuel in limited quantities... Don't let Obama hear- he will sink US Taxpayer $$$ into it...

39 posted on 10/18/2012 9:46:47 PM PDT by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Pretty clear to me that the vast majority of posters here are missing the point. Ah never mind....


40 posted on 10/18/2012 9:47:21 PM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

“While the technology has the backing of Britain’s Institution of Mechanical Engineers, it has yet to capture the interest of major oil companies”.

Possibly because they need more than a few tons of petrol.


45 posted on 10/18/2012 10:32:36 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
British Engineers Produce Amazing 'Petrol From Air'

Yeh -- as long as the air is over a dairy farm or a Mexican burrito wagon at lunchtime.

46 posted on 10/18/2012 10:41:17 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Produced 6 liters of petrol in 3 months? And I apparently missed the part where they mentioned how many thousand pounds it cost per liter to produce! Right up there with Solyndra, et al!


47 posted on 10/18/2012 11:09:47 PM PDT by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
Company officials say they had produced five litres of petrol in less than three months

WOW! That could power my nephew's moped for a whole....week.

52 posted on 10/19/2012 3:18:04 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

How long before global warming fanatics start blaming this technology for causing global cooling because the atmosphere is being depleted of carbon dioxide.


55 posted on 10/19/2012 3:35:48 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson