Skip to comments.The Idea That Barack Obama Was Stoned Is Not Outlandish.
Posted on 10/04/2012 7:56:08 PM PDT by nathanbedford
The Idea That Barack Obama Was Stoned Is Not Outlandish.
The man has lost a lot of weight. He has a history of drug abuse. By his own admission he has been unable to focus on one of the most important events of his life, scheduled to occur in front of 70 million people. His published schedule reveals a pattern of empty hours. His image has deteriorated markedly with dark shadows under his eyes, sagging cheeks, and generally a hangdog look which is commonly associated with drug abusers. He was listless in the debate. He could not maintain eye contact, a signal of drug abuse. He had trouble formulating his words. He was slumped in his posture. His eyes appeared dilated.
If Obama is in fact addicted to some mind altering substance one would expect his physical condition to deteriorate as it apparently has and one would expect his mental and emotional faculties to deteriorate as well. Obama is well known as a procrastinator, witness his dithering over the surge in Afghanistan and his inability to give a go-ahead order when pressed more than once to take out Osama bin Laden. Procrastination and inability to make decisions, of course, are tipoff symptoms of drug abuse. Liberals complain that Obama failed to bring up Romney's alleged "gaffe" about "the 47%" and that omission, which liberals regard to be utterly inexplicable, becomes completely inexplicable if it is considered to be the product of a drug abused mind. This failure which is so important in liberal eyes is merely one failing in a 90 minute epic failure all of which can be perfectly explained as the product of a drug distracted mind.
Obama himself admits to a history of drug abuse. Most observers have simply discounted the possibility that the abuse continues probably because Obama, superficially at least, presents himself as a model family man. But what if his marriage is a sham, a contrivance of Reverend Wright and his "down low" program of finding women who were willing to marry homosexual men and thus provide a cover for the men to remain in the closet? Has Obama been leading a double life as a homosexual? If so, is there anything in that existence which would preclude drug abuse? Would one not be at all surprised if these characteristics ran parallel? If someone is living a lie on one level would not he be expected to live a lie on another level?
What is there in Obama's situation that precludes the diagnosis of drug abuse?
To believe that Obama's drug abuse ceased because he is a family man is to rely on an unreliable determiner. Nor is the abuse of drugs by a president unprecedented, John F. Kennedy abused drugs and it was covered up. In fact, John F. Kennedy was widely regarded to be a model family man and he was a secret drug abuser who was President of the United States. We know from John F. Kennedy's history that merely occupying the White House does not preclude drug abuse. If we consider how few real press conference's Obama's handlers have exposed him to, if one considers his utter dependency upon teleprompters, if one considers the very careful stage management of Obama's public appearances, if one considers the severe limitations on Obama's schedule, one can understand that these rather unusual behaviors are completely consistent with drug abuse and absolutely necessary to conceal drug abuse.
Obama might have been incapable of prepping for this debate because of his inability to concentrate and remain focused. He has canceled his security briefings but not his nocturnal excursions to rub shoulders with celebrities or to raise money from celebrities, the rich, and other "sophisticates." If we consider the people he prefers to associate with, celebrities, entertainers, sports figures, "sophisticates," one sees the upscale drug culture. He has every evening open for these people but no time at night for Netanyahu in no time during the day for Congress. Did he absent himself at dinnertime from Netanyahu to take dinner with his family, on its face a preposterous notion, or was he driven by withdrawal symptoms to re-medicate? The glitterati are the people Obama apparently prefers to play with, but whom is he dependent upon? We all know that he has handlers at the public level who promote and protect his public image. We know that he had a very strong Chief of Staff in Rahm Emanuel and we know further that Obama is notoriously distracted from the day-to-day workings of the government. It is the fact that "Obama care" should properly be called "Pelosi care" because Obama abdicated the particulars to her. Personal control over Obama himself apparently seems to be centered and two women, his wife, who might well be a wife in an arranged marriage for the very purpose of committing a public fraud, and Valerie Jarrett who has been described as Obama's "Rasputin." This syndrome is certainly congruent with a drug dependent personality reliant upon his enablers and controllers.
All of this is speculation, but it does provide a coherent explanation for Obama's conduct in office and for his public near breakdown at the podium.
He's lucky to have Valerie around to wipe the coke off his nose before he goes on camera.
That’s lame. The chances that Obama was alone for more than 3 minutes out of the preceding 12 hours is nil.
“...his complexion has deteriorated considerably in recent months.”
During the debate, I noticed his facial skin was sagging from his lips outward in both sides of his face. I thought he didn’t look right and I was not thinking drugs. Now, I’m thinking it could be drugs. Too bad he didn’t collapse so medical people would have to check him out, find out why he collapsed.
More likely is that somewhere in the presidential staff is a "Dr Feelgood" either directly or through a close associate charged with keeping Zero on an even plane. I fear that it is far more probable that there are opiates, stimulants, even serotonin active agents in use. A little stim to wake up in the morning, some Prozac to even out the day and a dose of propanol for a good nights sleep.................
From the first moment of the debate I thought something was wrong with Obama. He was off and not as forceful as usual. He also smiled weirdly at the wrong times. I thought he looked like he was not well and perhaps on meds for a cold, etc.
It is HIGHLY likely that he is still using illegal drugs. Aren't they a life-long lure for the experienced drug-user....especially when under stress?
I figured it was the syphilis.
Who said he would have to be alone to do drugs?
It could be something as simple as a pill and not very obvious. jmho
What gave BO away? Was it when crazy Joe was seen at a
Denver 7-11 loading up on chips, Twinkies, Flamin’ Hot
Cheetos, and Zig-Zags?
Actually, Obama did a very good job in the debate...
I don’t find this to be out of the realm of possibility at all.
I have seen him other times that he acted pretty odd.
Not as odd as last night.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm, - - - - ?
We random drug test our NFL Quarterbacks, why not the Obama?
The Secret Service must have a stash of Pee-cups somewhere on AF-1.
Agree. I also agree with Species8472 that he has a regimen of RX drugs but I believe he also uses street drugs as well. Remember that time he disappeared and no one could find him for a few hours? And his weird impromptu trip to the Hoover Dam? The clenched jaw and odd facial expressions seemed very indicative of cocaine use, IMO. He seemed to me, if I had to take a wild stab, not high at the time of the debates but perhaps on the back end of a binge.
Bad makeup job. There are some pictures from last night that shows his face was made up much darker than his hands.
I believe it.
I was expecting him to say “dude.... Got any Doritos? I got the munchies....”
The moderator tried to lead him or keep him on message several times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.