If we give them veto power over the very First Amendment of our Constitution via the threat of or enactment of violence in response - they will exercise that power to the fullest extent possible.
Make a bad movie depicting Mohammad as a lecherous killer? Veto via violence.
Make a historically accurate argument about Islamic violence and methods? Veto via violence.
Say you do not believe Mohammad was a prophet of God? Veto via violence.
Teach that the Earth is billions of years old and life evolves from earlier forms? Veto via violence.
Criticize the state of Islamic nations and the plight of women therein? Veto via violence.
Accurately quote Churchill or Byzantine Emperors about Islam? Veto via violence.
There is no reasonable limitation because we are NOT dealing with reasonable people.
Absent a real offense against Islam when the powers that be in that region need something to distract the mob from their governments inept corruption and redirect their anger against the West and/or Israel - they will simply make one us.
Pretext: 1. An ostensible or professed purpose; an excuse.
2. An effort or strategy intended to conceal something
Great post.