To: thackney
Makes sense in SD or cost efficient producers in the area.
At least there is a new producer like NG as opposed to the onslaught of coal in Ohio will help. Many states will have no luck when coal is destroyed without NG.
6 posted on
08/07/2012 5:50:21 AM PDT by
Recon Dad
(Gas & Petroleum Junkie)
To: Recon Dad
Problem is NG is 250% higher cost than coal and that doesn’t count having to build new plants. Coal is a far more efficient source than NG or anything else.
Pray for America
9 posted on
08/07/2012 5:59:12 AM PDT by
bray
(If you vote for a Communist, what's that make you?)
To: Recon Dad
"At least there is a new producer like NG as opposed to the onslaught of coal in Ohio will help. Many states will have no luck when coal is destroyed without NG." Look at a map of natural gas pipelines for the USA. There are lots of them that route across the Midwestern states.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson