Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[ Virgil ] Goode: Ruling will not affect his campaign
martinsvillebulletin.com ^ | Aug 1 2012 | By BULLETIN, AP REPORTS

Posted on 08/03/2012 8:26:55 PM PDT by NoLibZone

By BULLETIN, AP REPORTS -

Former congressman Virgil Goode said Tuesday that a judge’s determination that a Virginia election law is unconstitutional will not affect his candidacy for president.

U.S. District Judge John Gibney on Monday struck down a law that allowed only state residents to circulate petitions to get presidential candidates on the general election ballot.

Ruling in favor of the Libertarian Party of Virginia, Gibney said the restriction severely burdened the party’s freedom of speech and is not narrowly tailored to promote a compelling state interest.

Goode, who lives in Rocky Mount and formerly represented the 5th District in the U.S. House of Representatives, is the Constitution Party’s presidential candidate in the Nov. 6 election. He said the ruling will have no effect on his candidacy because everyone who has circulated petitions for him has been from Virginia, although he and some petitioners have gone out of state to gather some signatures from voters.

The law, as it stood, “was fine with me,” Goode said. However, he said that different states have different laws, and he thinks the judge probably looked at that factor in making his ruling.

(Excerpt) Read more at martinsvillebulletin.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: cinoapologists; electioins2012; fumr; sisterwivesattack; virgilgoode; whenmittbotsattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

1 posted on 08/03/2012 8:27:01 PM PDT by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Virginia is going to be important to Goode. And to your boy Romney.

GOP-E should have pushed a conservative.

/johnny

2 posted on 08/03/2012 8:42:55 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Interesting how these stories quoting Virgil just keep on popping up in VA. I suspect it’ll happen a lot more.

The gop should’ve picked a conservative.

Now wouldn’t it be ironic if the state whose gop decided it didn’t want to “clutter” the presidential primary ballot ended up being the same state that handed their chosen candidate his posterior on a platter?


3 posted on 08/03/2012 9:04:16 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard. Because "our" pro-abort, anti-gun socialist is SO much better than theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
Karma. She's a b!tch.

/johnny

4 posted on 08/03/2012 9:05:40 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Like it or not - which I don’t - Romney was chosen by garnering the majority of primary votes in quite a few states. Now spoilers like Goode and a few others are evidently satisfied to gum up the works.

We’ve got to go with what we’ve got or we’ll be stuck in Obamaland permanently.

Romney recently did a good job for himself in Britain, Israel and Poland, in spite of democrat protestations because they’ve got nothing else to go with. Nothing.

I’m on board with Romney now because anything else is suicide.

SUICIDE!

It’s time to put our feelings aside and rally for the sake of the country. Otherwise, they will be no United States left.

I’m going to.


5 posted on 08/03/2012 9:17:07 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
You vote how your principles and concience decide you should. Not a thing wrong with that. I intend to.

Romney actually hasn't got the nomination, yet, but there was some cheating going on, Virginia and Florida pop to mind. BTW, are all of Florida's delegates going to be counted because they held the election early? Or just half, like the rules say?

We won't be stuck in Obamaland anymore than we're still stuck in Clintonville.

Goode isn't a spoiler. He's a candidate, that did what was required to get on the ballot in VA. He's there.

Sorry if you don't like it.

GOP-E should have muzzled Rove from badmouthing conservatives, and put up a conservative instead of a pro-abort, anti-gun, socialized medicine, big-government liberal. Blame them, not Goode.

/johnny

6 posted on 08/03/2012 9:23:50 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
It’s time to put our feelings aside

Oh, it's not 'feelings'. It's principles. How one lives ones life, the rules one uses to make judgements.

Killing babies is wrong, supporting those that enable killing babies is wrong... stuff like that.

You vote your principles. I'll vote mine.

/johnny

7 posted on 08/03/2012 9:28:10 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Oh come now.

Four more years of an administration that is the most radical, detructive, divisive, pro-Marxist, pro-muzzie, pro-death, pro-illegal immigration, pro-racialist, anti-free enterprise, anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-everything we love and stand for can't be so bad.

I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

:-)

8 posted on 08/03/2012 9:28:28 PM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

It won’t affect my campaign either. Nor Pat Paulson’s. Because all of ours are equally as important as Virg’s


9 posted on 08/03/2012 9:28:55 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa (Vote for Goode, end up with evil, pat self on back repeatedly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Oops. Typo alert. detructive=destructive.


10 posted on 08/03/2012 9:29:41 PM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
I'll vote mine.

And effectively vote for barry.

11 posted on 08/03/2012 10:59:50 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Goode isn't a spoiler. He's a candidate, that did what was required to get on the ballot in VA. He's there.

Still calling the efforts to ensure Obama is reelected (just so long as Romney loses), a moral bit of standing up for principles? Goode can only get any sort of recognition in one State and the best he is likely to do is to dilute Romney support - if being a factor that migh give Virginia to Obama isn't being a spoiler, then what constitutes a spoiler?

12 posted on 08/04/2012 3:19:37 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Goode will get support Romney abandoned.

You guys should have thought about that when you were messing with the primary.

13 posted on 08/04/2012 4:41:00 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Someone correct me if I’m wrong but was this not the reason Newt, Perry and I think one or 2 others did not make it onto the VA primaries because they had used out of state volunteers?


14 posted on 08/04/2012 4:50:19 AM PDT by neveralib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

You know, every 4 years we’re treated to a series of tirades by republicans telling us that if we don’t vote for their crummy candidate, all manner of ills will befall us. America will end. Depressions. Plagues of boils. Whatever. The only things that change are that the tirades get more shrill every time, and their candidates get worse.

It’s a suckers game.


15 posted on 08/04/2012 4:51:56 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard. Because "our" pro-abort, anti-gun socialist is SO much better than theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; All

Sorry Mitt won the nomination fair and square..


16 posted on 08/04/2012 4:52:25 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Radical Islam is a bigger threat than the LDS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Like it or not - which I don’t - Romney was chosen by garnering the majority of primary votes in quite a few states.

Through lying, cheating, and subterfuge, and THIS:

Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin

Screw Romney and the GOP-E he rode in on!

17 posted on 08/04/2012 4:55:31 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

What could go wrong is that instead of the current socialist we could elect a different socialist who will rule with the explicit and tacit consent of the gop. Much as I think the gop is largely useless, it at least makes of a show of opposing radical measures when they emmanate from the other major party. That won’t be the case if the socialist in question has an R after his name.


18 posted on 08/04/2012 4:57:43 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard. Because "our" pro-abort, anti-gun socialist is SO much better than theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
No, he didn't really. It took a specific act by his state campaign chairman to make it so.

The Virginia primary will always be in question ~ it will hang over his head like a sword of Damocles's for years and years ~ with Bolling, McDonnell and Cantor able to bring it down at will.

Probably not all that good for his credit rating either.

Didn't you think it strange that during the Spring Primary campaign we didn't get any campaign ads on TV in this region?

Since most of those ads run in spots pre-arranged months before (in block sales) the fact there weren't any coming from the big guy means nothing less than the fact that HE KNEW long before.

19 posted on 08/04/2012 4:58:06 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

LOL! Tell the thousands of Virginians who wanted to vote for someone other than willard that he won it fair and square.


20 posted on 08/04/2012 5:01:44 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard. Because "our" pro-abort, anti-gun socialist is SO much better than theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

He’d make a damned good Veep pick. Just sayin’


21 posted on 08/04/2012 5:04:11 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neveralib
The Virginia system was quite simple. You had to get so many signatures in each Congressional district, and so many statewide, and the names had to be collected by Virginia residents.

You could theoretically find your nominating petitions rejected if you used out of state collectors.

The real deal though was the cut off set by the state committee for when a pile of nominating petitions was sufficient that it didn't need to be reviewed for accuracy or completeness.

Traditionally the state party had done the reviews at a relatively low cut off level ~ 10,000 or so. This year just three days before the deadline to hand them in they set it at 15,000 ~ and only one candidate had that many. That meant the others would be reviewed.

Newt and Perry had claimed more than 10,000, as had Paul. The reviewers rejected some of Newt's ~ something like 1500 or so ~ on the grounds they were fraudulent or fraudulently obtained by a commercial campaign nominating petition signature collector. Perry actually came up with less than 10,000 ~ although under prior rules his simple claim of exceeding 10,000 would have gotten him past any review. Paul's folks had over 10,000 and passed the review.

So, as soon as that was all done ~ skullduggery and all ~ one of the older volunteer petition reviewers and his wife who live in a rural area in Central Virginia appeared to have run off the road and hit a tree not far from their home. He died. Haven't heard about her condition for some time.

So, a KOINKYDINK? I didn't think so at the time and I still don't.

22 posted on 08/04/2012 5:09:16 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Virgil hasn’t killed any campaign workers


23 posted on 08/04/2012 5:11:37 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
This mess was engineered for the most part by the Lt Governor Bolling, who also has this claim of being Romney's state campaign chairman.

When Bolling was faced with a downstream problem with his own nomination for Governor next year, he found he had to go to the State Committee to get a reconfirmation of their decision to hold a PRIMARY.

Bolling wanted a primary ~ really, really, really bad. His biggest competitor for the Governorship is "The Cooch", state attorney general Cucinnelli ~ and he wanted a CONVENTION!

So, which way do you imagine the state committee went? Now mind you this is a very Conservative state committee and they saw how the Mittbots stole the primary, and who did it ~ ?

Surprise, surprise ~ the state committee handed Bolling his head on a platter, denied him the use/misuse of the primary system, and elected to go to a CONVENTION ~ which, truth be told, gives it all away to Cucinnelli or another Conservative.

Bolling and the other leftwingtards here are being EASED, or is that OOZED, out of active political life as rapidly as can be arranged legally.

Whether Romney wins or not, he is UNWELCOME in Virginia! So are his henchmen and other running dog lackeys.

24 posted on 08/04/2012 5:19:38 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat; muawiyah; All

Then how come Ron Paul was able to get on the ballet. Face it Newt dropped the ball and how long his was living in Virginia??


25 posted on 08/04/2012 5:21:24 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Radical Islam is a bigger threat than the LDS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Why bother with voting for Goode? You can get more bang for your buck by directly supporting Obama. Using a middleman never works out as you want it to.
26 posted on 08/04/2012 5:24:43 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
How? Ron Paul's people got the signatures and passed the verification.

In fact, and I"m certainly not a Paulista, Ron Paul was the ONLY candidate who passed the verification!

Romney's submissions were never verified. He could have asked to have that done anyway, just to show he had an honest campaign, but his failure to do so is a clear demonstration of the fact he did not then,nor does he now, have an honest campaign team.

I think his moral code is defective when it comes to the complex doctrines surrounding 'sins of omission'. Just isn't there!

27 posted on 08/04/2012 5:29:47 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
A vote for Goode is a vote or Goode. A vote for Obama is a vote for the acolyte of the antichrist. A vote for Romney is a vote for the acolyte of the antichrist.

It's that simple. Only a mind numbed robot like knee jerk leftwingtard would imagine a vote for Goode, is a vote against Romney and for Obama.

Neither Romney nor Obama were going to get those votes for Goode.

So, even if he loses, the Goode campaign sends a message to the big boys to not mess with the primaries anymore.

28 posted on 08/04/2012 5:34:17 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

LOL! What the Va gop did would make your Cook county politicos proud. The Va gop couldn’t just say that “we only want willard on the ballot,” what they did instead was say that they would only review the nominating petitions for the candidates who were NOT on the 2008 ballot. Only two candidates that were on the 2012 ballot were on the 2008 ballot as well: willard and Ron Paul. So all the candidates other than those two had their nominating petitions reviewed with a fine tooth comb.

Oh and how the petitions would be reviewed was announced less than a week before the deadline for submission.

Cute huh?


29 posted on 08/04/2012 5:53:26 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard. Because "our" pro-abort, anti-gun socialist is SO much better than theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
Through lying, cheating, and subterfuge

Then, According to you, evidently, a majority of Republicans who don't know anything about voting and are easily lied to and cheated into undermining themselves.

I voted for Gingrich in the CA primary. Unfortunately I was outnumbered. Take it for what it is, I guess. But I think a vote for anyone other tham Romney in the general will be a vote for soetoro, and I just can't do that. I want to give my country at least a shred of hope for survival.

30 posted on 08/04/2012 6:45:05 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

onedoug, death of the country is coming, its 2 years with obama maybe 4 years with romney...if the GOPe wanted to win they shouldve picked a conservative, trust me this wouldve been one election where a far right winger would have won by a landslide, instead romney might barely pull it off to gain nothing.


31 posted on 08/04/2012 7:18:35 AM PDT by 09Patriot (your freedom to be you, includes my freedom to be from you.--Wilkow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

onedoug, death of the country is coming, its 2 years with obama maybe 4 years with romney...if the GOPe wanted to win they shouldve picked a conservative, trust me this wouldve been one election where a far right winger would have won by a landslide, instead romney might barely pull it off to gain nothing.


32 posted on 08/04/2012 7:18:54 AM PDT by 09Patriot (your freedom to be you, includes my freedom to be from you.--Wilkow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
The idea that a bunch of RINO squishes are as bad as a bunch of full throttle Marxists has got to be one of the stupidest ideas I have ever heard.

Giving another four years to the worst ever, most destructive administration, pro-muzzie, pro-death, pro-Marxist, etc., etc. to "send a message" might be even the single dumbest idea I've ever heard.

In the vernacular, it's been called cutting off your nose to spite your face.

33 posted on 08/04/2012 10:04:50 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

“The idea that a bunch of RINO squishes are as bad as a bunch of full throttle Marxists has got to be one of the stupidest ideas I have ever heard.”

No one said anything of the sort. And you know it. Your rhetorical technique of implying that those who disagree with you are stupid or unpatriotic is tiresome.

The key issue for myself and many other conservatives is what level of damage each major party candidate is likely to do if elected to office. A socialist with an R after his name who will be completely unrestrained by congress, or a radical socialist with a D after his name who will be somewhat restrained? I and many others think it’s pretty much a Sophie’s choice: we lose either way.

If you wish to vote for Any Socialist But Obama, then do so. But don’t expect validation and praise for your actions on a conservative political forum.


34 posted on 08/04/2012 10:40:12 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard. Because "our" pro-abort, anti-gun socialist is SO much better than theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
It’s time to put our feelings aside and rally for the sake of the country. Otherwise, they will be no United States left.

I call hysterical, fear mongering, nancy boy boosheet!

35 posted on 08/04/2012 10:46:16 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode over evil. Voting for mitt or obie is like throwing your country away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
The idea that a bunch of RINO squishes are as bad as a bunch of full throttle Marxists has got to be one of the stupidest ideas I have ever heard.”

That's exactly what you are saying. Sorry, there is no restraining a full throttle Marxist who hates America.

So, you're obviously right, let's give him another four years to complete his destructive task.

Great thinking. Such thoughtful conservatism........deep......profound......pure.......

36 posted on 08/04/2012 1:09:28 PM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

My! How virile, nube.


37 posted on 08/04/2012 1:21:15 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
My! How virile, nube.

Earlier join dates don't magically endow one with with more Conservative credibility, and kissing the hinders of the liberal leaders of the queer agenda proves that one never really was. A republican, maybe, but not a Conservative.

38 posted on 08/04/2012 4:25:27 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode over evil. Voting for mitt or obie is like throwing your country away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

>> Killing babies is wrong,

Nascent life will have a better chance of survival with 3 Republican Houses than 2.

In my humble opinion, there’s increased risk of more abortion with another Obama term. This is one of my moral metrics for POTUS 2012.


39 posted on 08/04/2012 4:33:15 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Goode will get support Romney abandoned. You guys should have thought about that when you were messing with the primary.

I didn't start out wanting Romney anywhere near the Presidency - I just hate the thought of Obama going another 4 than I hate the fact thaty Romney is the only other with a chance.

You guys seem to ignore just how bad Obama is and have these high hopes that, if you atre successful in stopping Romney, the train will somehow stop instead of running us all down.

40 posted on 08/05/2012 3:29:17 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Virgil hasn’t killed any campaign workers

Now you're accusing Romney of murder?

I guess that Goode's jumping around between Democrat/Independent/Republican and "having the most conservative record of any Democrat" makes him the best guy for the job. Trouble is, he couldn't hold his own seat acouple years ago and he has no name recognition at the national level - face it, he's a spoiler and you guys don't give a flip if Satan himself gets elected just so long as it isn't Romney.

41 posted on 08/05/2012 3:37:52 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
SUICIDE

Heard this same kind of crap in '08. Bottom line is Romney is nothing more than Obama light. In '16 this nation will be begging for a conservative.

42 posted on 08/05/2012 3:43:38 AM PDT by catfish1957 (My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Wonder how many have realized that by having a Obama - Romney race that this country is now guarnteed to have a non-Christian POTUS for eight consecutive years.


43 posted on 08/05/2012 3:46:44 AM PDT by catfish1957 (My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: trebb
So now Romney is NOT Satan ~ coulda' sworn ~ (/s)

Actually I"m much more concerned with these acolytes of the antichrist in the election, and there are two big ones this time.

But ol'Virg? Ain't no thang.

44 posted on 08/05/2012 4:16:24 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: trebb

BTW, with the kind of followers Rombama has he doesn’t have to do his own killing. Things just happen eh.


45 posted on 08/05/2012 4:17:47 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: trebb
you are so wrong. No one is ignoring how bad Obama is. But we recognize how bad Romney is. Same sort of bad. Same degree of bad.

He's actually our worst candidate possible ~ not even a real Republican, and certainly never a Conservative.

46 posted on 08/05/2012 4:19:17 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
Wonder how many have realized that by having a Obama - Romney race that this country is now guarnteed to have a non-Christian POTUS for eight consecutive years.

Christian is as Christian does. Bush was a devout Christian (if one belives him) and he set the stage for an Obama. Kennedy was a Roman Catholic, yet he was a horn dog who ran around on his wife. Pelosi calls herself a Christian, yet she is pure evil. Unashamedly Christian is a the desired condition for a President, but it's not a requirement - the government is not a religious institution. I'd prefer an Atheist, who will not impose atheism on us all to a Christian who doesn't act the part.

47 posted on 08/05/2012 5:20:39 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
BTW, with the kind of followers Rombama has he doesn’t have to do his own killing. Things just happen eh.

How.......pithy.....I guess O'Reilly would give you at least a few points for that "argument".

48 posted on 08/05/2012 5:22:46 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: trebb

O’Reilly has guards.


49 posted on 08/05/2012 5:31:24 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

So you’re voting for Obama then.

Good luck. We’ll all need it.


50 posted on 08/05/2012 3:33:12 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson