Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Mitt Romney loss wouldn’t necessarily be a disaster
The Daily Caller ^ | August 3, 2012 | Matt K. Lewis

Posted on 08/03/2012 1:26:47 PM PDT by Bratch

Don’t buy the doom and gloom pronouncements from conservatives telling you, “this is the most important election in history.” A loss for Mitt Romney would not necessarily spell long lasting disaster for Republicans, nor would it be the death-knell to conservatism. In fact, it’s possible a 2012 loss could lay the groundwork for a stronger Republican party and conservative movement.

Elections are almost always seen as urgent and morally imperative. But sometimes major victories can only come in the aftermath of what appear to be devastating defeats. John Kerry‘s loss in 2004 laid the groundwork for a Democratic takeover in 2006 and 2008, and Jimmy Carter‘s defeat of Gerald Ford in 1976 paved the way for the Ronald Reagan in 1980. In other words, it is a mistake to assume losing a presidential election is a permanent defeat.

“This should be the most important election since 1980, but so far it is not,” says Reagan biographer Craig Shirley. “Scottish historian Thomas Carlyle postulated the ‘great man’ theory of history, and indeed this was true with Washington, Jackson, Lincoln, TR, FDR and Reagan. But history has not summoned forth great men in 2012 and in fact our history today is small.”

This is not to say Republicans should concede the election, but conservatives should keep November in proper perspective.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cinoapologists; conservatism; dailykostrolls; fumr; gaymarriageadvocates; guncontrolzealots; herecomesdailykos; hesyourproblemcinos; obama; paultards; promitt; romney; ronpaultrolls; sisterwivesattack; truebluecinos; truebluelibertards; whenmittbotsattack; whenpaultardsattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 381-394 next last
To: comebacknewt

See that is the thing.

If Palin is VP I can see the risk of ‘blaming’ the tea party. Despite the fact the administration will have in it’s central slot - the most stand forward Tea Party around.

If Palin is VP I can see the risk, and I’ll (happily) take it.

If however Mitt goes for someone weak and gullible, I’ll hike the day after voting for him, and we’ll all move on starting from day one.

DAY ONE.

But first. Before that. We un-elect Obama.

THAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FACING AMERICA RIGHT NOW.

Everything else must wait.

November 7th, all bets are off, if Palin isn’t VP.

:D


281 posted on 08/03/2012 6:37:40 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt
won’t stop the media from blaming all the country’s problems on the Tea Party though

They already do. Embrace the blame and kick it back to them. The old media is losing badly. Newsweak is going to stop printing dead tree editions, and will be another web blog. Which old media outlet listed millions in losses today?

Don't be afraid. Do what is right, trust to God for the results. Lots of lessons in the Cruz victory. GOP-E took a 14 point smackdown, with the help of principled conservatives, and by the Grace of God.

Vote your principles, but don't be in fear.

/johnny

282 posted on 08/03/2012 6:40:30 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
THAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FACING AMERICA RIGHT NOW.

I think the most important issue facing America right now is America turning away from God.

The most important political issue is that both parties are socialists, and conservatives have no party representation.

/johnny

283 posted on 08/03/2012 6:46:52 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Palin is Ms. Personality on our side.

Heck on both sides. She is it. Romney may just be Mr. Rich, and a lot of things which are not all back, but he is ... BORING.

Boring as the day is long. Boring with a capital B.

It all hinges on who Romney selects as his VP.

I’ve chosen. I’ll vote for Romney. And I’ll support Palin.


284 posted on 08/03/2012 6:50:22 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
Two reasons this is wrong.

1) Once Obamacare goes into effect, it will never be fully repealed. No government program ever does. Future debates will be over how to reform it so it "works better", not over getting rid of it (see Social Security and Medicare).

2) There are at least four Supreme Court justices over 70 years old, including Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg and Kennedy. While I have no guarantee Romney would pick true conservatives, I have an ironclad guarantee that Obama would pick true left-wing progressives (see Kagan and Sotomayor).

In other words, Romney may not be the conservative president we have been wanting, but he is not a European Socialist. And anyone who says there is no difference between Romney and Obama is fooling themselves.

285 posted on 08/03/2012 7:03:53 PM PDT by BruceS (If you refuse to support the lesser of two evils, then you are supporting the greater of two evils.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
It's important that you vote your principles as your concience dictates. I'll not gainsay you if you do that.

I won't be voting for Romney even if Palin is the Veep candidate. For me, it's not about a cult of personality. It's about fundamental principles.

/johnny

286 posted on 08/03/2012 7:14:43 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: sam_whiskey

I’m just angry and venting my frustration...
***The proper ventilation zone is the GOP, not conservatives.


287 posted on 08/03/2012 7:16:21 PM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux

No fear-mongering here, FRiend;
***That is exactly what it was.


288 posted on 08/03/2012 7:17:53 PM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: jyro
It could be no worse than a second term of Obama

you obviously have not been paying attention the last 3 1/2 years....your statement is inane at best.

289 posted on 08/03/2012 7:18:35 PM PDT by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BruceS

anyone who says there is no difference between Romney and Obama is fooling themselves.

***Sure there’s a difference. But it’s not enough to vote for a lying, baby-killing statist just because he’s a little bit different from the other lying, baby-killing statist.


290 posted on 08/03/2012 7:33:26 PM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

your right, I didn’t state it correctly. I really hope Obama loses and Romney wins


291 posted on 08/03/2012 7:37:54 PM PDT by jyro (French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I hate seeing the infighting, too..


292 posted on 08/03/2012 7:51:29 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Do I really need a /s tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I’m sorry you feel that way.


293 posted on 08/03/2012 7:57:30 PM PDT by pcottraux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux

I’m sorry you feel that way.
***I’m sorry you think you’re a conservative

I’m conservative (oh yea uh-huh) and pro-gay marriage and I want your ZOT!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2914374/posts


294 posted on 08/03/2012 8:23:45 PM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
It happens every 4 years, regardless of what we like.

CINOs gonna push their liberal GOP candidate, and some of us won't comply. Frustrated CINOs lash out because conservatives won't go along to get along. Regular as clockwork.

/johnny

295 posted on 08/03/2012 8:25:00 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux
but we've never had a president likeInsert current Democrat name here.

That same thing has been said as well.

If Clinton won a second term, FR would be shut down. We seem to be still here.

Lay off the histrionics. It's not helping you sell your candidate, and is very annoying.

/johnny

296 posted on 08/03/2012 8:29:25 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: painter

Well, they certainly aren’t going to impeach Romney, because he’ll be the GOP’s liberal marxist whose father was an open fan of Saul Alinksy.


297 posted on 08/03/2012 8:35:35 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: sam_whiskey

Yes, I’m a conservative, but
***Uh, huh... A conservative willing to compromise his principles, a CINO

I’m conservative (oh yea uh-huh) and pro-gay marriage and I want your ZOT!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2914374/posts


298 posted on 08/03/2012 8:41:24 PM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Regular as clockwork.
***sorta begs the question why such CINO behavior has been tolerated these many years on FRee Republic.


299 posted on 08/03/2012 9:32:49 PM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
I've got friends here that are going to vote for Romney because he's got an (R) or because they are scared.

I don't propose we zot them. Maybe they will, eventually, get some courage of conviction. Some that pushed for McLame are pissed off and now not voting for Romney.

Things get better, if you hold the line and the faith.

Not everyone that disagrees with us needs to be nuked. Unless they are politicians.

/johnny

300 posted on 08/03/2012 9:38:54 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 381-394 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson