Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Syrian Rebels Threaten To Attack Russian Naval Base
DNA ^ | July 26, 2012

Posted on 07/26/2012 5:19:10 AM PDT by Fennie

Syrian rebels have threatened to attack Russia's naval base at the port of Tartous if Moscow continues to supply weapons to President Bashar al-Assad's regime.

"We have a warning for the Russian forces: if they will send any more weapons that kill our families and the Syrian people we will hit them hard inside Syria," said Louay al-Mokdad, a logistical coordinator for the Free Syrian Army (FSA).

"Informers inside the regime are telling that us that there is a big weapons shipment arriving at Tartous in the next two weeks. We don't want to attack the port, we are not terrorists, but if they keep acting like this we will have no choice."

(Excerpt) Read more at dnaindia.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: assad; russia; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 07/26/2012 5:19:17 AM PDT by Fennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I don’t think that’s a good career move.


2 posted on 07/26/2012 5:26:15 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

The Rebels might not like a Russian solution to the rebel areas near the naval base.


3 posted on 07/26/2012 5:31:27 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

It has been posted that the WMD in Iraq were moved by the Russians into Syria,if not directly by the Russians, then under their guidance and control. It was also posted that the ownership was by the Russians because Saddam had not paid for them yet.

It seems a reasonable thought that the Russians never relinquished control and have in fact maintained that control in Syria.

Conclusion..... the WMD are now at the Russian naval base


4 posted on 07/26/2012 5:35:39 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Do you by any chance realize that you have, in effect, stated that George Bush was CORRECT in stating that there were WMD in the possession of Sadam Hussein?
That cannot be allowed to happen. After all, those who suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome have based their entire belief system on “Bush Lied.”
Poor babies.


5 posted on 07/26/2012 5:47:15 AM PDT by CaptainAmiigaf ( NY Times: We print the news as it fits our views.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bert

I have to agree with you...

another case of simple logic, applied simply..

but it was still bush’s fault :)


6 posted on 07/26/2012 5:50:32 AM PDT by joe fonebone (I am the 15%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

"They would choose...poorly."


7 posted on 07/26/2012 5:56:14 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

It bruns me up that I can no longer find the article from several years back about activities prior to the actual invasion. I distinctly recall five heavy haul rigs being attacked by our forces from the air. During that attack on these rigs headed for Syria, we killed a couple rooskies who were escorting the cargo. It looked like it could have been a diplomatic blowout, but very quickly and quietly, the story disappeared. I agree with your conclusion; Russia was up to its eyeballs with weapon deliveries to Saddam, and before the war, removal from Saddam.


8 posted on 07/26/2012 5:59:28 AM PDT by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Oh right that will go well do they have footage of Georgia


9 posted on 07/26/2012 6:09:14 AM PDT by Flavius (What hopes for victory, Gaius Crastinus? What grounds for encouragement ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
It was also posted that the ownership was by the Russians because Saddam had not paid for them yet.

It had also been posted that Iraq had the means of manufacturing WMD, such as the ones used in the war against Iran and on his own people.

So, at what point do Russians gain ownership?

10 posted on 07/26/2012 6:15:59 AM PDT by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Good luck with all that.


11 posted on 07/26/2012 6:19:36 AM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

Russian convoy fired on in Iraq

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/06/sprj.irq.russian.convoy.attacked/

That is an original article from CNN.

AFAIK Russian convoy was six Grand Cherokees. Three people were wounded.

Isn’t it too tricky to move a WMD program this way?


12 posted on 07/26/2012 6:40:24 AM PDT by cunning_fish (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: varon

-——So, at what point do Russians gain ownership? ——

We do not know that detail nor other details of Saddam’s actual capability.

In my mind there is a game called WMD. Like other games there is a ball. It is called WMD. Everyone* can play because possession of the ball is not really required. Even direct knowledge of the properties or actual existence of the ball is not required.

Points are scored by making press releases or speeches. The truly exciting part of the game is making some speculation, no matter how wild or illogical, and having it go global. Money is made and political capital is amassed and votes are garnered.

There are some who actually possess real knowledge. They control the ball even if the actual ball is not in their possession. They can always put more points on the board because if the game slows, they have the ability to start a new quarter and score over and over before the others can come back on the field.

In the world of today, we presume that we know all because all is constantly poured onto the media and the internet. The main players of WMD though have maintained secrecy about the real nature and condition and events of WMD because if actually known, the game would end.

Where’s the fun in ending the game?

*(Bert is playing today)


13 posted on 07/26/2012 6:44:24 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
O goody, goody, pass the popcorn! The Soviets, oops, I mean the Russians have been Syria's loyal defender for so long nobody can remember when they weren't. It would be just lovely to see Soviet, I mean Russian military vessel at the bottom of the Tartus harbor! The Russkies will make mincemeat out of the Mad Muslims! It will be a nice fight, Cruel Russians against heartless religious fanatics. Like I said, pass the popcorn. Maybe the Syrian WMD will be used on the Russkies and then they can nuke the Muslims...can I have butter on that popcorn?
14 posted on 07/26/2012 6:55:08 AM PDT by Netz (Netz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I’ll bet Zippo is swatting a lot of flies over this. He’s between Barack and a hard place. He wants the Brother(s)hood to win, but he loves kissing Russian ass.


15 posted on 07/26/2012 7:08:42 AM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

LOL! I agree with the rebels - now go attack Russians!


16 posted on 07/26/2012 7:58:16 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
We don't want to attack the port, we are not terrorists, but if they keep acting like this we will have no choice."

Yes, they are terrorists. The rebels and the Assad government both.

By this time, the rebels have been joined by all the terrorists in the world who can get there. Assad has been joined by Russia (although not really terrorists as of yet) and Iran.

17 posted on 07/26/2012 8:16:07 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

18 posted on 07/26/2012 8:17:30 AM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes
"It bruns me up that I can no longer find the article from several years back about activities prior to the actual invasion. I distinctly recall five heavy haul rigs being attacked by our forces from the air. During that attack on these rigs headed for Syria, we killed a couple rooskies who were escorting the cargo. It looked like it could have been a diplomatic blowout, but very quickly and quietly, the story disappeared. I agree with your conclusion; Russia was up to its eyeballs with weapon deliveries to Saddam, and before the war, removal from Saddam.

I remember (thought I was the only one), they were running in the middle of the night, blacked out, we apologized for the transgression.

What WMDs ???

19 posted on 07/26/2012 8:24:57 AM PDT by JMJJR ( Newspeak is the official language of Oceania)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JMJJR

Thanks for the sanity check. ;)


20 posted on 07/26/2012 8:32:03 AM PDT by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson