Posted on 07/21/2012 6:57:23 PM PDT by rawhide
'I'm not protecting anyone that made my life a living hell': Teen faces jail time after lashing out on Twitter and naming the boys who sexually assaulted her.
17-year-old sexual assault victim is facing a jail sentence for tweeting the names of her attackers in anger at their light punishment.
Savannah Dietrich named and shamed the boys on the social messaging site, writing: 'There you go, lock me up. I'm not protecting anyone that made my life a living Hell.'
The Louisville, Kentucky teen told The Courier-Journal she was frustrated by what she feels is a lenient deal for her attackers.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
So please share how you deductively reasoned that since I would hold someone responsible for raping my drunk daughter, that I am lacking as a parent, and would naturally approve of my daughter having put herself in a bad situation. I believe your word choice that applies here is "Seesh".
My deductive reasoning?
The very fact that you envisioned your daughter at this type of party, behaving the way this foolish girl did.
What conclusion SHOULD someone come to?
Your assertion that a father who is upset about a drunk daughter being raped equates to his approval of her drinking is moronic. And THAT is being generous.
Here are some other bad decisions that I both disapprove of AND don’t think warrant rape:
1. Dressing provocatively
2. Walking home alone at night
3. Jogging in an unlit park at night
4. Getting a ride home from someone she just met
So to be clear, female members of your family are cut off from your protection if they drink too much? Yea, well I’ll take my brand of fatherhood over yours any day.
As short and to the point as it was, I see you didn’t read my post.
Have a good day.
What the Hell are you doing on Free Republic? You are obviously hanging out on the wrong web site. That, or you need to really re-think this situation.
“Al Jazeera” must be down.
The very fact that you envisioned your daughter at this type of party, behaving the way this foolish girl did.
There are girls who stuck to soda or juice and ended up with problems due to some little sick pricks slipping something like ketamine in their drinks.
As far as underaged drinking, a lot of kids will make foolish choices. That’s part of being a kid. Rape should not be the consequence.
The girl would have been better off if she had a few trusted friends and they all looked out for each other.
Read my posts in order, and in context. I wasn’t commenting on the girl, or her actions.
I was responding to your comments about the other poster’s daughter.
Short of chaining a kid to the wall and locking the door, there is no completely foolproof way to prevent a poor decision.
Teenaged girls have been known to go to parties abstain from alcohol. Unless they’ve got trustworthy friends and guard each other’s drinks, they’re still at risk for someone else’s poor decision...
You obviously have made a decision to miss the point.
Have a good evening.
You obviously have made a decision to miss the point.
Your point seems to be an attempt to bait the other poster with comments suggesting he’s a bad father because he can envision his daughter at a party where alcohol is served.
I was responding to that point but you seem to have trouble seeing around your agenda.
The whole juvenile special treatment is counterproductive and evil.
i say if you can do the crime then you can receive the usual punishment.
Coddling vicious young predators just ensures they will continue their evil ways.
You missed again.
He asked my logic for making my earlier comment.
I gave it.
Now go away.
Baldy,
Your only agenda was to bait me with holier than thou BS that only has one logical reasoning to support it, i.e. This girl had it coming.
You post this kind of trash and then act offended when confronted about it.
Now as you say, good day.
You still miss the point, I was talking about your fathering ability. Not the girl, or her actions.
Not the girl or her actions.
I didn’t have to ‘bait’ you. You just put it right out there.
You then asked what logic I used to reach my conclusion.
I told you. Directly and concisely.
I then asked you what other conslusion should one reach.
You chose to be offended rather than answer a simple, direct question, which was an answer in and of itself.
You took offense because you couldn’t answer my direct question without looking like a bad father? Tough.
You made an indefensibly stupid assertion, i.e. Invisioning a child being passed out = bad parent.
Then you doubled down, then you tripled down.
You certainly are providing everyone with a clear example of a bad father, i.e. got drunk, got raped? tough.
That isn’t what I said at all, and you know it.
Going on offense may work, but it doesn’t change the reasonong of why you ducked my question.
I told you. Directly and concisely.
I then asked you what other conslusion should one reach.
You took offense because you couldn’t answer my direct question without looking like a bad father? Tough.
I responded that short of chaining a child up, you will not prevent them from making a few poor choices. Unfortunately for this girl, she made a very poor choice near a few of society’s sick bottom feeders.
You’re just throwing a temper tantrum because your Alinsky tactics aren’t working because you’re not permitted to frame the argument.
Here’s a question for you, and I bet you lack the courage to give an honest answer. Did you consume alcohol while underage and, if so, did you deserve to be sexually assaulted due to this choice?
Here’s a follow up question. Did your consumption of alcohol while underage make your mother and father “bad parents?”
Nonsense. It is exactly what you said. There is no other way to take it.
You asserted than anyone who could imagine their teenaged daughter ending up uncouncious and raped, after venturing where she shouldn't or drinking, was a bad father.
To paraphrase “Walking Eagle,” he obviously made a decision to miss the point. Do you know the definition of a “Walking Eagle?”
RE : orry, but if she was instructed not to make comment, she should have abided by that. Otherwise, put yourself in their shoes.
I have less respect for the tinpot drag queens than I do for the ignorant drug addict selling to kids. One of them had the knowledge to say somethings wrong. I hope that clears it up
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.